Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
What Social Games Can Teach Us
Printer-Friendly VersionPrinter-Friendly Version
View All     RSS
April 17, 2014
arrowPress Releases
April 17, 2014
PR Newswire
View All
View All     Submit Event





If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM TechWeb sites:


 
What Social Games Can Teach Us
by Alice Rendell on 07/01/11 06:44:00 am   Featured Blogs

The following blog post, unless otherwise noted, was written by a member of Gamasutra’s community.
The thoughts and opinions expressed are those of the writer and not Gamasutra or its parent company.

 

I work in Facebook games as a Game Designer. It is my starter job in the industry and if I am absolutely honest it was more about gaining experience and getting ‘my foot in the door’ than having a burning desire to work on these types of games.

I think that many of the games out there are ultimately flawed on a game design level and there are an awful lot which are very shamefully obvious about wanting players’ money, friends, time and souls. I have always been a gamer, spending my childhood in a darkened room where the only light I was exposed to was the dim glow of my television screen, so my personal preference for games is quite removed from the mass that appear on Facebook.

However, after over a year of working in this section of the industry there are some interesting game design issues that I have had to rethink and have tested my knowledge somewhat and I truly believe that there are things to learn from the way social games are made, if not always by the games themselves

1. Tutorials - Don’t judge me!

Good tutorials in games are like Nicolas Cage turning down a movie, a rare thing. Not just in social games but with AAA as well. I really don’t want to have to wait 10-15 minutes for the intro of the game to finish falutning its shiny light effects and fancy animated water, I want to actually play the game I’ve just bought. But that’s the thing, I’ve already bought it, so I will persevere out of principal to get to the end of the incredibly elaborate and somewhat tedious intro and to start actually playing the game, just to get my money’s worth.

Facebook games are free, so before you even think about introducing any type of encouragement to convert players into payers, you have to ensure that they have got past the intro and have actually started playing your game. 

The players of FB games are a shallow and vain lot and the success of your game depends on snap judgements, so if you don’t hook a player in the first 2 minutes of game-play then they will leave to go and play something else. This is harsh, impatient and entirely fair.

Why should we force players to learn all those complicated strategic game rules with all their fancy nuts and bolts? It’s their game and they just want to play it. FB games require special thought as to how the tutorial works, which in turn can benefit all types of games. Firstly you have to be incredibly clear and simple. This doesn’t mean having to have a simple game just simple enough to introduce.

If I say “Here is my game which requires you to build a restaurant from the ground up which you can completely customize if you want but really you only need some essential items and then you can show it to your friends and blah blah blah” I would be hearing a lot of “Woah now Mr Wordy pants, I have 5 mins to play this game in my lunch break, I am not going to sit around just reading message boxes”. But if I say, “This is a game about owning a restaurant, make sure yours is the best!” then that is a much easier hook.

Secondly, they have to be non-text heavy, If these players wanted to read about some bad-ass gun-wielding hero who is the only hope to save the post apocalyptic world of Mundaneia then they would be reading a book.

This doesn’t mean the game can’t have a great integral story, it just means you don’t have to tell everyone about it in the first 5 minutes. You have to grip a player in that first instant and make them say “Yep I have finally found you. You are the one for me, the game I will commit myself to for the rest of my life...or at least the rest of the week”. No matter how good your game is after 5 hours, no-one is ever going to know if they don’t get past the first 5 minutes.

2. Communications: The unjustified manner in which verbose boxes of an instructional nature are unnecessarily thrust upon the unwilling spectator!

FB game have to be great at communicating with the player. Mostly people play FB games in their lunch breaks, or when they have a cheeky 5 mins with nothing to do Yes there are hardcores who are playing all day long but generally players don’t have hours to invest in these games on a daily basis.

Overall they may return each day to play but the majority of people just want a fun distraction. Therefore the communication from game to player has to be spot on. Only say the relevant information that the player needs to play the game. You don’t need a 10 minute cut-scene explaining how this emerald was dug up from the depths of Mordor, crafted by a dwarf with no fingers and toes and when the power is harnessed for the greater good it can transform your mind and increase your ability to...play the game a bit longer.

You just need to tell the player that this emerald will increase your health and let you play more. This doesn’t mean that you can’t have an elaborate story but it has to be there as a sticky thread which all the other game elements are attached to rather than a big mass of glue which all the game elements get stuck in. So your instructions and communications to the player have to be short, simple, direct with absolutely no room for ambiguity. Let’s face it, this is not what always happens in AAA games either.
 
3. The Players: Who are we?

Who are playing FB games? The simple answer is everyone. When I first joined my company, I was told that the majority of our players were female, American and 35+ and most likely homemakers. I’m a 20+ British, self confessed gamer-girl geek I have no idea what the average American housewife wants from a game.

But after spending months in the forums, listening to players' comments, feedback and criticism, I learnt much more about what our players wanted from their average Facebook game. In this case, it was a game which could be accessed easily for a few minutes at a time, with lots of opportunity for self achievement and something that tested the mind but was not too challenging.

This was fairly removed from what I would want myself from the games I play. But that didn’t matter, their wants and needs were perfectly justified and they had the right to a game system that worked for them as well.

This is one group of FB gamers, but never before have games had the opportunity for such exposure to lots of different types of people from all different walks of life, with different views on what they deem as ‘fun’ and what they would consider as entertainment. This a great opportunity for the game industry to really understand what the different types of people want from games and that is well worth taking advantage of. 
 
In Conclusion
So are FB games really a blasphemy to all gaming that has begone before it? Not necessarily in every case depending on how you choose to look at it (nicely avoided don’t you think?). There are issues and flaws...like all sections of the games industry.

There are corporately pressed suits who don’t care about the players wants and needs and are only out to fill their nicely lined pockets...like all sections of the games industry. But there are also people who have accepted the challenge and the restrictions of the platform and want to use it to create something interesting.

We can use this opportunity to learn about different ways to design games and for the first time connect to a variety of people from different ages, background and beliefs. That’s a good thing, right?


Related Jobs

Digital Extremes
Digital Extremes — LONDON, Ontario, Canada
[04.17.14]

UI ARTIST/DESIGNER
Digital Extremes
Digital Extremes — LONDON, Ontario, Canada
[04.17.14]

UI ARTIST/DESIGNER
Linden Lab
Linden Lab — San Francisco, California, United States
[04.16.14]

Lead Engineer
Gameloft
Gameloft — New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
[04.16.14]

R&D Game Designer






Comments


jean-francois Dugas
profile image
Also working as a game designer for Social Games, I'd say that there is 2 type of Facebook game.

Advertising games and monetization games.



Like all F2P Browser games or facebook games, although the "fun" factor of the player is taken in account, every game mechanics must lead to profit, which is normal; An Xbox game gets sold 60$ for his content. A Facebook game is based on donation from players.



Saying that Facebook games are an insult to the gaming industry is, in my opinion, saying that DLCs and every Free To Play MMOs is also a blasphemy.



If you are intertaining enough a player to stick around and play your free facebook game during is launch break, then he should accept the fact that you are doing this for a living and that games aren't only created with love, but with money.

Therefore, being asked to pay 10 facebook credits to buy 100 coins to continue playing is not evil; it's marketing.



I think a game designer working on Social game must be a bit of a marketing guy by developing game feature that are fun for the player, and that can produce a cash flow. Design flaws and balancing problems is common with this. There is no rule of thumbs.



As for your article, I agree with most of your ideas actually. For the tutorial, I found that if you can't explain a feature in less than 2 minutes to your lead programmer, there is a problem. Facebook games must be designed for 6 year old kid. If an adult cannot understand it withing 2 minutes, they'll likely close your application and go back to Farmville.



This bring me to another concern about facebook games: UI Design. If you want a player to stay in your facebook game, make it easy to understand: add some rainbows and unicorn when something happen, pop some flying stars and fireworks when you level up; make each player's action unique. Make them feel unique. When you'll begin to work on features that can make your player feel unique, than you'll begin designing with marketing in mind.



In conclusion, Facebook games can teach us 1 thing. Connectivity.

Or in other words, Cross-platforming.

(This is the smallest conclusion I ever did!)



Keep up the good work!

R A
profile image
A lot of these points are just indicating the nature of these types of games and not really specifying anything good they've really done. Any simple thing, simply by virtue of being simple, can be contrasted in a positive way against something more complicated. Checkers, unlike chess, allows ease of play, any new player can become familiar with the game in minutes. A children's cartoon is in ways superior to an HBO miniseries because at anytime you can view an episode and realize what's going on, there is no time intensive story to keep up with. A popup book visually conveys its purpose in seconds, unlike the layers of messages hidden within the walls of text of a novel. Do you see how these straight comparisons, with no recognition of the importance or validity of different factors, are a bit disingenuous?



I'm sure there are positives to facebook games, but simply contrasting them by saying they're simpler isn't very compelling. I think you could replace facebook games with tic tac toe and the thrust of the article would be about the same. If this were about books and writing, you could compare Twilight with Dostoevsky and make just about the same point.

Eric Schwarz
profile image
If there is one predominant lesson to be learned in Facebook games (and really, the entire wave of portable games that have sprung out of the smartphone market), it's that the brunt of tutorialisation falls upon design of the game itself rather than on text boxes, pop-ups, training levels, etc. Those sorts of things are all well and good in a game where the player is expected to sit down for an hour or more, but when you've got only a few minutes to teach the player, you can accomplish a lot more by way of suggestion in your gameplay. Everything from artwork (clear good guys and bad guys, objects with obvious functions communicated through appearance), to level design (introducing game mechanics early on and building environments that clearly demonstrate them), to audio (music can completely change the urgency and feel of your game), etc. must conspire in a way that is much more immediately obvious and apparent when you're trying to sell your game in 30 seconds. Some might call it cheapening, making features too obvious and easy to understand... I'd call it efficiency and making smart, frequently tough decisions about how to frame the experience you're providing.

Abel Bascunana Pons
profile image
Nice article Alice, thanks for sharing.



My question is, how many more users could FB games have wasn't it for the ultra excessive spamming of "Publish this", "Tell your friends", "Publish that" both with your explicit, inducted or non-asked permission (as when you play you accept the EULA and thus authorize the gaming company to publish on your wall)?

Not to offend your friends you find repeatedly closing windows not to flood the FB Start page with these viral posts.



I agree with text length, that's one of the reasons i think Enemies & Allies is more popular than Army Attack (besides different and more clear game mechanics).



One interesting think to discuss here would be the interface. Did you notice how in E&A's HUD you see the main resource, Wood, but the rest is hidden not to overcomplicate things?



How many of you by the way can stand the FB games music loops for more than 10 minutes? (i'd like to note that, using the same example, Enemys & Allies' song suspiciously resembles the most popular notes of the Champions League theme... it can be a coincidence though).


none
 
Comment: