My Message close
GAME JOBS
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
May 22, 2013
 
Wargaming.net
UI Scripter - AS3
 
NetherRealm Studios
Lead Software Engineer
 
Monolith Productions
Lead Mission Designer
 
Insomniac Games
Sr Network Programmer
 
Insomniac Games
Gameplay Programmer
 
Insomniac Games
Concept Artist- Environment
spacer
Blogs

  Gamazon: Make Me a Man
by Arinn Dembo on 08/26/10 08:59:00 pm   Expert Blogs   Featured Blogs
8 comments Share on Twitter Share on Facebook RSS
 
 
The following blog was, unless otherwise noted, independently written by a member of Gamasutra's game development community. The thoughts and opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of Gamasutra or its parent company.

Want to write your own blog post on Gamasutra? It's easy! Click here to get started. Your post could be featured on Gamasutra's home page, right alongside our award-winning articles and news stories.
 

Like other W.i.G.’s, I care a lot about the number of female characters available in games, and the quality of those characters.  This being said, I have not had the chance to include strong female characters in every game that I’ve made.  Not every game is about “characters” per se.  And even at times when a game has a single central Character, I wouldn’t always choose by default to make that character female.

Fans of my own work recently asked why my company chose to make the protagonist of Fort Zombie, our z-apocalypse survival title, a male character.  Despite the fact that we are an independent development studio, Kerberos is subject to market forces:  were we trying to pander to a male audience, when we chose to develop “Ben Reilly” rather than “Jen Reilly” as the leader of human resistance against the undead?  Were we under pressure from a patriarchist publisher?  Were we burdened by sexist ideas of the capabilities of men and women, which prevented us from creating a female character who could kill zeds and run missions in a post-apocalyptic world?

Actually, the answer is none of the above.  Ben Reilly is a character that emerged from the creative process of a whole team.  The physical character design was the work of our lead artist, but I know that if I had insisted on a female version, Chris Gerspacher could have given me a woman who was every bit as battle-hardened and had-enough-of-this-crap as Ben Reilly.  And if it was up to me, Jen Reilly probably would have had the same tattoos, worn the same glasses and smoked the same cigar.  I wouldn't consider this unrealistic, given the fact that I personally I have tattoos, wear glasses and smoke cigars.

Similarly, the gameplay elements as designed by Martin Cirulis had no gender.  The same life and combat skills are often possessed by both male and female characters in the game, and the skills available in the Player Character are the same as those available to the NPC’s.  Many of the combat specialists available as NPC’s in the game are women, including the retired female sheriff which one of our players affectionately nicknamed “Granny Headshots” and the three young female soldiers named Dunsany, all of whom are handy with a gun.  I was responsible for the creation of all of these characters, and if I had a reason I certainly could have created a female protagonist for the game as well.

This being said, I did not consider a female protagonist for Fort Zombie.  There was actually a reason for this.  It ties in with some of the philosophical points that are made in the premise and background fiction for the game.  It also directly relates to the ways that we wanted the gameplay and mood of FZ to differ from other zombie titles.

First, I think it is probably wise to point out that female protagonists and PC’s are actually more common in zombie horror titles than they are in many other genres of gaming.  I will refrain from launching into any kind of extended psychoanalysis on this score, and simply point out that many players may feel a bit more “vulnerable” when clothed in a female avatar than they do in a male avatar.  (Yes, I know—this is a good spot to insert a sarcastic remark about how the female avatars might feel a little less “vulnerable” if they would put on some damn clothes!  Let’s just assume I wrote a snarky paragraph about that and move on.)

This emotional reaction is probably based on deeply ingrained beliefs about the inherent “victimhood” of women versus men, but from a pragmatic standpoint it really doesn’t matter whether these deeply ingrained beliefs are true or false.  Horror is a genre that requires the creator to create and command a wide range of emotion.  Political correctness doesn’t earn you any points in achieving an emotional reaction.  You need to hit people below the belt in horror--not just above the neck.  And because vulnerability is a mood that suits most horror titles very well, it can be a valuable tactic to use the female body to create that mood.  In much the same way, exaggerated male musculature or heavily armored male bodies are used as symbols of invincibility.

The upshot of this?  Making the PC a female character in a zombie game is not necessarily an original choice.  And if the gameplay that you are creating is not about being invincible—when the Right Answer for the player is going to be running rather than gunning in many cases—it becomes an outright cliché to make the player BE a girl in order to “run like a girl”.

There are other aspects of gameplay in Fort Zombie which I would prefer not to associate stereotypically with women, as well.  The goal in the game is to rescue as many human survivors as possible, and to provide them with food, shelter and weapons in order to survive a coming wave of zombies.  In other words, the general player dynamic of the title is not one of lashing out in angry alienation against the hordes of the undead:  it’s actually a game about helping and caring for other human beings.

There is not and will never be a time in the Fort Zombie universe when the player lashes out to hurt another living person.  Despite the fact that “enemy factions” have come up multiple times among player suggestions, I’m adamantly against the game going in that direction—because the whole point of the title is not to hurt people.

You can chop up and shoot zombies all day long—even play soccer with their heads, thanks to the game’s physic engine!—but there are no “enemy survivors” or “cultists” or “bad people” for the player to hurt, steal from, or fight off.  The only enemy in the game is Death and Darkness.  The only goal is survival and nurturance of others—to provide supplies, protection and leadership to your fellow human beings.  The simple idea behind the game is actually best expressed by the philosopher Dr. Cornel West:

“You can’t lead the people if you don’t love the people. You can’t save the people if you don’t serve the people.”

It was for this reason that my instinct was to make the Player Character in the game a man rather than a woman.  There is a lot of talk among W.I.G.’s about female stereotypes in gaming, but in general the stereotypes of men are much more troubling.  Personally, I am very tired of the Man-as-Sociopathic-Death-Machine stereotype, and the message in general that murder is the only way to “Be a Man”.  I wanted Fort Zombie to offer a more interesting role for men.  And I wanted Ben Reilly to embody some of the concerns and emotions that I see in the real men who occupy the real world around me.

I had the chance to create a wide variety of NPC characters for the game, which allowed me to spread the traditional heroic qualities of combat competence in many non-traditional directions.  I gave interesting skills and abilities to a lot of people who are not traditionally presented as “useful” in games--including women, the elderly and children.  I also gave each NPC a little piece of story content, to open a window into their lives and experiences during the apocalypse—this allowed me the freedom to explore a variety of viewpoints, and to include people in the game universe who are seldom represented as “part of the world” in games, including an openly gay character expressing grief over the loss of his spouse.

If the central mode of gameplay in Fort Zombie had been to mow down Zeds like the Angel of Death, I actually would have been far more likely to give the game a female protagonist.  After all, that’s not something we see every day.  I think gaming could use a few more invincible women—and a few more thoughtful, caring, nurturing, and all-too-human men.

 
 
Comments

Giro Maioriello
profile image
I have to agree that there has been very little variation in the portrayal of men in games. Probably because to some degree men see these portrayals as displaying traits which they value as masculine and positive.



But the real reason for my comment is about Ben Reilly; isn't he actually the Scarlet Spider in Marvel Comics!

Robert Marney
profile image
"Granny Headshots" is a fantastic name for an NPC, especially in a game where headshots are a valuable currency. (Not likely to be your next opponent in Tetris, for instance.)

Roberta Davies
profile image
I'm a female gamer, and feel obliged to go on record here to say I don't particularly care about the number of games with female lead characters. I'm interested in the quality of female characters only in the wider sense of thinking all characters should be well written.



So there's another stereotype shattered, then.



Until very recently, most video games were simplistic arcade-action titles. The idea of a "character" is irrelevant if all the word means is a bundle of pixels the player uses for virtual running, jumping, and shooting. Any such "characters" are going to be simple-minded gun-totin' behemoths, by definition, and essentially interchangeable. Is it fair to drag them into discussions about more complex modern characters?



And yes, I also love the name "Granny Headshots"!

Arinn Dembo
profile image
I've often said that "you don't need to have ovaries to care about sexism". And obviously, the reverse is also true--having ovaries doesn't make you a feminist! That said, I agree with you that quality is at least as important as quantity. I would rather see one truly great female character in gaming than a hundred "token female" characters that were complete garbage.

Jiri Petruzelka
profile image
"Retired female sheriff which one of our players affectionately nicknamed “Granny Headshots”" love that too, not just the nickname



I'd say at first that I'm not fully-fledged game developer or writer and most likely much less experienced then you



Relating to all this topic of your posts - I always wonder why it is that because most gamers are male then we would have low number of female characters... meaning... I don't think men dislike women (in ordinary sence). Because most gamers are male, I would still expect at least balanced ratio between characters...I mean...women (and in my age I can still afford to say "girls" too) can be cool too



I also don't think there's any less variantion in men's portrayal than in women's portrayal, considering the assumed lack of female characters and the target audience I would see it the opposite way. However I feel that ranting about this is meaningless - if we believe characters are made the same way all the time and we dislike that fact, why don't we just try to make out character (of any gender) interesting (that is if we're not restricted by employers etc. which would make discussion kinda pointless)...

And given the example's I believe you're capable of it



That being said...I get the argument with horrors. However if we choose to ignore the possible immediate impression 'd say it's possible to make female look as competent or more than some male (game-wise speaking women are often designed towards damage avoidance then resilience and in the end they can have the same survivability... but that is not what I mean).



All this could probably summed up as "it's as good as we make it"...



I would actually appreciate more games (movies, series...) with interesting female protagonist



Unless I missed a point of your articles

Arinn Dembo
profile image
No, I think you are getting the point of my blogs pretty well. :) This particular blog is about male characters, but I agree with you that the current logic that the Marketing Genius Types are peddling about female characters these days is pretty ridiculous.



Even if you're only willing to consider the men in the marketplace, you should include more and better female characters in games. 90% of all men are actually quite interested in women. And the younger generation of men and boys--basically the exact 13-25 age bracket that many game companies are trying to target--are actually not nearly as sexist as many of the older generation were raised to be.



Selling games that either portray no women at all, or show women only as sex objects or victims, is really not a marketing strategy per se. It's more of a propaganda assault. They're not trying to appeal to the audience as they are--they're trying to create an audience that buys into this negative view of women and girls.

Jake Akemann
profile image
Having a nurturing male character is certainly an interesting way to shift the general stereotype of male characters in games. However... this day and age, one would be hard-pressed to find a gender-personality combination that hasn't been tried before. We've all seen the sword-swinging brute of a woman who has little room for emotion and is practically screaming "women can be strong too!" and we've all had to save a helpless, scared nobleman stuck in an ivory tower. But generally those characters create stereotypes in themselves and they don't change the barbarian-man and helpless-woman stereotypes that have lasted the test of time.



What I think is less common is when we see a stereotype we know act in a very unpredictable way. Perhaps the battle-hardened man cares deeply for somebody special to him and the helpless girl lashes out maliciously when push comes to shove. Seeing characters put up fronts of self-perception, then seeing them act essentially equal to each other might be a way to balance out the scales.

Arinn Dembo
profile image
I agree with you that creating a photographic reverse of a gender stereotype does nothing to change the nature of the basic image. Over-simplification cannot be remedied with over-simplification.



However, I also think there is a difference between taking the negative baggage associated with the female gender ("scared, helpless, stuck in an ivory tower") and sticking it on a man, versus exploring the positive strengths associated with women (compassion, cooperation) and allowing the possibility that men possess these qualities too.



So far as sword-swinging brutality as an image of "strength"? I think that images of female combat competence and leadership have yet to be fully explored. Granny Headshots is just the tip of the iceberg. ;)


none
 
Comment:
 




 
UBM Tech