Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
December 19, 2014
arrowPress Releases
December 19, 2014
PR Newswire
View All
View All     Submit Event






If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:


 
Spoof of Concept [10/10]
by Jacek Wesolowski on 02/05/10 12:05:00 am   Expert Blogs

2 comments Share on Twitter Share on Facebook    RSS

The following blog post, unless otherwise noted, was written by a member of Gamasutra’s community.
The thoughts and opinions expressed are those of the writer and not Gamasutra or its parent company.

 

Part 10 of 10: The Ultimate Wrong Question [previous parts]

 

The biggest problem with great inventions is that they mostly don’t work.

 

Leonardo di ser Piero da Vinci made informed drawings of an ornithopter and a helicopter, but never actually built either. Montgolfier brothers’ hot air balloon could fly, but not in the pilot’s chosen direction. Otto Lilienthal died, because he had an accident while flying one of his gliders. And as for Wright brothers, before they managed to build a successful prototype, they needed to test two hundred different wing shapes. In the end, inventing an airplane that could actually be useful took five hundred years. The devil is in the details, and these only become obvious in hindsight.

Stepwise refinement is not a sole domain of engineering. Actors rehearse. Laws are adjusted. Humans are born half a metre tall and lack some basic functionality at that point. This post has taken twenty seven re-writes so far. Complex entities don’t just emerge miraculously from the sea - they grow and evolve, one mistake at a time. Anyone can have a dream of a great achievement, but progress is only made by people who can agree on what the logical next step is (“next” being the primary term here; feel free to define your own logic).

Some people confuse prototyping with polish.

The main difference between those is that the former is proceeding from one step to another, while the latter is iterating on the same thing. Polish is an exercise in fine-tuning, and prototyping is much more than that. You pose a question; you perform an experiment; you draw conclusions. If you’re stuck with the same question at that point, then you did something wrong. You should have a dozen new questions and at least one answer after each attempt.

The one thing that unites flying machine inventors, actors, lawyers, bloggers and game designers is that, in order to succeed, they have to know where they’re going. The structure and component points made by this post have changed dramatically over the course of twenty seven rewrites, but I have always known which question I’m going to brand as the Ultimate Wrong One.

Don’t ask: “is this fun?”. Not because games can be more than that, or because “fun” is subjective. This is the Ultimate Wrong Question, because it amounts to asking: “are we there yet?”. Well... no! of course we aren’t. On the flip side, we can always get there, eventually, if we’re good enough. I mean, come on, The Muppet Show was fun, and 99% games never get much more random than that. Just pick your theme and aim carefully.

The best question to be asked is “what kind of fun is this supposed to be”, because it amounts to asking: “where are we going?”. The second best question is “what am I missing”, because the answer is your logical next step. Your next prototype.

 

Lesson Learned: None. This post is a prototype, and it doesn’t have a cheesy moral yet. Hope you enjoyed it anyway.


Related Jobs

GREE International
GREE International — Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
[12.19.14]

Sr. Game Systems Designer
Demiurge Studios, Inc.
Demiurge Studios, Inc. — Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
[12.19.14]

Game Director
Filament Games LLC
Filament Games LLC — Madison, Wisconsin, United States
[12.19.14]

Game Designer
Bigpoint GmbH
Bigpoint GmbH — Hamburg, Germany
[12.19.14]

Lead Game Designer (m/f) - Hamburg - 3344





Loading Comments

loader image