|
In 1954 Frederick Wertham published a book called The Seduction of the Innocent. In the first half of the Twentieth Century comic books had become an increasingly popular form of entertainment among young Americans.
In the infamous tome he argued that heavy themes of perverse sexuality and violence permeated the books and had a profound influence on children in the United States. Some examples were that there was an improper, homosexual, underage relationship between Batman and Robin. Another of Wertham’s concerns was that Wonder Woman was a lesbian because she exuded strength, confidence and independence.
Wertham gained some fame due to his authorship of this book and was a key expert to participate in Robert Hendrickson’s subcommittee on juvenile delinquency. The subcommittee looked very closely at the influence of comic books and their impact on young Americans. This negative press led to mass burnings of comic books and severe backlash against comic book publishers and newsstands that sold them. The result of all this drama was the adoption of the Comics Code Authority, heavy censorship and the demise of pulp horror and crime comics.
Similarly, in the late 1960’s, movies came under extreme fire from parties concerned about the violent and sexual themes prevalent in films and the ease at which minors were able to be exposed to them. This eventually led to the creation of the MPAA and their ever evolving ratings system. This is a concern that is still fairly prevalent today.
Likewise, in the early-to-mid nineties, television shows came to the forefront of the debate with regards to the exposure of minors to violence and sex. Television shows like NYPD Blue and other maturely marketed productions came under heavy fire and this and other concerns lead to the television rating system. Like the film industry, the television debate is still ubiquitous, particularly with animated television shows like South Park and Family Guy that are accused of targeting children, despite their mature themes.
The previous paragraphs are a loose gloss of some very complex social concerns with regards to popular forms of entertainment that were very poignant in the past and still remain a major concern for many. The music industry has also gone through, and still continues to go through, the same kind of criticism, but the point is brought across with the summaries I have provided. I am bringing them up to set the environment for my main point.
Concern for video game content was inevitable, and in 1994 the ESRB, a self-policing rating system within the industry, was established. It was not until the violence at Columbine High School occurred that the concern of video game content was shot into the mainstream media and the hearts and minds of the American public.
The accusations and concerns of that incident are well known and if you are not familiar with them a quick Google search will bring you up to speed. Since then, criticism of video games has been continued in the mainstream media, being addressed as recently as the 2008 Democratic Primaries by Senator Clinton.
Perhaps though, none of the movements against video games are as famous as the 2007 Jack Thompson crusade against the industry, which was very similar to Wertham’s over-the-top and exaggerated campaign against comic books. This also is well documented and if you are unfamiliar, Google it.
It was on the Gamasutra front page and various other media outlets today that President Obama addressed the American Medical Association and how to reduce medical costs by increasing health saying, “It means quitting smoking, going in for that mammogram or colon cancer screening. It means going for a run or hitting the gym, and raising our children to step away from the video games and spend more time playing outside.”
(Transcript: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-06-15-obama-speech-text_N.htm )
The major point of the President’s speech was a discussion of how to reduce healthcare costs. Putting smoking and video games into the same sentence provides a corrupt and unfair implication. To me this is evidence that the idea of video games contributing to the decline of America’s youth is becoming an unconsciously accepted idea.
First it was violent behavior that video games were being blamed for and now it is the unhealthy state of America’s youth that video games are being blamed. And now, we get to it – Mr. Obama, if you really wanted to improve the health of America’s children, or the population in general, you would have criticized the use of high fructose corn syrup in an astounding amount of foods marketed to children instead of a pastime activity.
While I agree with the basic tenet of the President’s statement – that children should get more exercise, the use of high fructose corn syrup is, on every possible level, much more damaging to the physical status of the American public as a whole then video games ever could be. It is ridiculous that video games have become the popular thing to blame for just about all of American children’s tribulations.
In the June 13th-19th 2009 issue of The Economist an article called “The Underworked American” broached the subject of the laziness of America’s youth, particularly academically. In the article they argue the complacency of the United States education system shoulders much of the responsibility. The President has argued that there is a need to “rethink the school day” and modernize it to make better use of children’s time.
I believe that Mr. Obama is right to point at the education system as being part of the problem. But, while we are talking education, how about reinstituting a proper physical education programs in schools that have been hit so hard by budget cuts, instead of pandering to the laziness of overweight and unhealthy children and their parents? Where is this sense of responsibility with regards to health?
The Harvard Medical School Center for Mental Health and The British Journal of Medicine have compiled exhaustive studies that refute the idea of video games and violent behavior being tied together. Jack Thompson was disbarred for his exaggerated and erroneous statements concerning video games. It is time for everyone, especially at the top, to take responsibility for their statements and actions.
Video games, like comic books, movies, music, and television shows are not to blame. In the end Video games are simply the most recent scapegoat. Despite their egregious exaggerations the Werthams and Thompsons of the world bring some valid points – there should be policing of the exposure of violence in video games to minors, and there is. But, the reason video games are under so much fire is because of their popularity and the lack of responsibility in the public. Nobody wants to take blame so they point at the easiest target.
Games are already one of the largest forms of entertainment in America today and continue to be one of the fastest growing, but they are not to blame for the degradation of our children’s health or lack of accomplishments. It is disappointing to see the President using an old, accepted and improper crutch (video games) as a reason for unhealthy children while the other, real issues like poor diet and lack of proper physical education are ignored. For shame Mr. President.
|
Ultimately the point of the statement is true, reduce health costs by having people take care of themselves, and having parents raise their kids to be healthy. But I think, as politicians do, instead of provoking the outrage of parents by claiming they're not doing their job right, or by raising the ire of various food conglomerates by pointing out how unhealthy their food is, he instead cached his meaning behind the veil of some very current stereotypes to attempt to deliver his message without sparking a mess in which the original message is lost. Instead he's raised the ire of various people in the games industry because we're all very sensitive of misinformation (and there has been a lot of it lately), but then, it's a stereo type that is often well deserved, and that the industry is actively fighting with all their various fitness games, even if it isn't the industries fault that parents let their kids sit on video games for 8 hours a day.
So I guess I just wish that a powerful political figure would for once just be extremely blunt in what he says, without hiding any of his meaning. Perhaps he could make use of a little dark humour, "kids play far too many video games these days and don't get enough exercise....but what sane parent lets them in the first place. Sure our diet is a problem, but since when have we all been spoon fed, unable to choose what we shove down our own gob." But heh, imagine the riot and political suicide that would be, people don't like it when you tell them it's their own damn fault they're unhealthy.
I attend one of the many emerging game design college programs, and the one thing I notice that is near universal in my classmates (all of whom claim to be hardcore gamers) seem to scoff at the idea of excerise as some nuisance; much akin to doing your taxes or showing up for jury duty. I hear many jokes that no body plays the Wii in the hardcore crowd because they have to get off the couch.
In order to help change the mindset of America's impressionable youth we have to take the incentive to lead healthy lives ourselves, and show that we can control our gaming habits. To stop making 24 hour WoW marathons or scoffing at the sun something that is an acceptable activity. If we can do that, then we can truly claim that we are a pastime not a lifestyle.
Since all varieties of games are available to us, it just comes down to how we ourselves choose games that make us more physically active and promote good behavior, and how we as role models encourage kids to choose such options over others. It's all a matter of choice, and it either falls in line with what Obama wants or it doesn't.
Now, I agree that he shouldn't have singled out video game where television, the internet and even reading books have the same results. But, I do agree with the point; kids should get outside and play more. Just do what my parents use to do. When I did something wrong take the games away and ground me by making me go out ride my bike. I used to hate that :)
It seems to me he wants the US to go back to making things and become a country that creates and exports things that the rest of the world will consume. Until China starts importing our new lineup of green cars that we won't buy one of the US biggest, if not largest, exports is entertainment (movies, DVD, music, VIDEO GAMES). With the video game industry competing and exceeding the movie industry in sales I think it is in the best interest of who ever is President to uphold the industries that are making America excel as opposed to holdup companies that can no longer viably support themselves (no thanks to government mandates).
I strongly agree that we have an issue with obesity in this country, especially in children, but some how I am able to work a full day, play video games at night, and still find time to workout close to an hour a day, and do outdoor related stuff outside of all this. It all comes down to personal liability, because if I stop doing the physical activities I gain weight FAST! This is why socialized medicine works in theory but not in practice because we need to allow people to make stupid decisions (like not being physically active) but we can't afford to be standing by with a net to catch them if and when they fall, or in this case don't get off the couch.
Also video games are slowly becoming more and more physically involved. The Wii is a great step towards this effort and all the Project NATAL and Sony motion camera tech will only make it even more involved. But you can't make people play those type of games, there will always be people that want to live in the dark, play video games 24 hours straight and eat pizza and chase it with a 2-liter or Mountain Dew.
Obama said something once about seeing video games as basically a time-waster. I don't recall the exact words, but that's how I remember it. That's fine, he's slightly too old to get it completely, but at least he's not a total dinosaur who listens to that ridiculous "murder simulator" crap. I don't think he's a big problem for us, since he seems to have more regard for the first amendment than Hillary Clinton or Al Gore.
In the end I think this whole situation will go away. Kids aren't stupid and in twenty or thirty years there won't be anyone left to represent the "video games are the devil" side.