|
[United States Senator Tom Coburn recently singled out a federal grant to help save video game history as a waste of taxpayer dollars. In this blog post, reproduced from the CHEGheads blog, International Center for the History of Electronic Games director Jon-Paul Dyson argues otherwise.]
Do you think video games are worth saving? We do!
Recently, news reports cited as wasteful spending a $113,000 grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) to The Strong’s International Center for the History of Electronic Games to preserve video games. We disagree. We believe video games not only are the most dynamic, exciting, and innovative form of media today but also an important form of play and a driver of cultural change.

Games sharpen people’s ability to solve problems and overcome challenges. Games teach people to cooperate and to collaborate in new ways, whether that’s in the same room or across the Internet. It’s no wonder that schools, businesses, medicine, and the military are using video games to train tomorrow’s leaders.
Game designers are also creating great art. Games charm, captivate, and amaze us, from the awe-inspiring wonder of Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, to the whimsical fun of Angry Birds, to the subtlety of The Sims. Video games are influencing society just as much as novels did 200 years ago or movies did 100 years ago.
And yet, if we do not act now, many of the early electronic games and the record of their influence on society will be lost. Video games are stored in digital formats that don’t last forever. The lifespan of tapes, disks, cartridges, and CDs is measured in decades, not centuries, and the software and hardware running these games are becoming obsolete.

At the International Center for the History of Electronic Games, we are working to preserve video games and a record of their impact on our society. We have assembled a collection of more than 36,000 video games and related artifacts; we are creating exhibits to tell their history; and we are preserving records of the people and businesses who create these games and the players who love them. In addition to that all that, the IMLS grant is allowing us to establish standards for preserving video games, to ensure we have the hardware and software to access these games now and in the future, and to record video of each of these games to capture their play.
This is important work. As the IMLS’s Mamie Bittner noted, “Future innovation springs from the hard work and inspiration of the past. Technology changes quickly, and with changes, the work of entrepreneurs can be locked away and inaccessible. Can we imagine how researchers in the 22nd century will view the earliest groundbreaking interactive video? Without the work of institutions like The Strong’s International Center for the History of Electronic Games the vitality and imagination of early gaming would be lost to future generations.”

We don’t think this should happen. So despite this recent criticism, we pledge to continue, and even to increase, our preservation efforts in the future. Like great novels, movies, music, and paintings of the past, video games are too important to lose.
|
By all means you should seek donations from the public, from video game companies and from other generous groups. But leave tax payer money out of it.
While I disagree with Sen. Coburn on a number of issues, him highlighting the tremendous amount of waste in Federal Government spending is not one of them.
Instead he singles out videogames, which gives me the impression that his intentions aren't all that sincere.
That said, if a State's Constitution allows for such efforts, by all means, let them do it if it has the support of the state citizens.
Other than that, it should be up to private citizens and organizations to do it.
The existence of "The National Film Registry" occurred with the blessings/funding of the Federal Government and Library of Congress and is a huge asset for preserving the history of film, and I think the same should probably be done for video games. (Who pays the bill is another story, David Packard was instrumental in getting the ball rolling for the film preservation movement)
Many of the arguments put forth by the film makers (Christopher Nolan, Rob Reiner, etc.) for the importance of film preservation could easily be applied to video games. The big eye opener was that the original copy of Godfather was damaged and they showed how (luckily) other copies were stored and maintained which allowed the movie to be restored to "close" to original quality. (And this is the godfather! probably one of the top 5 movies of all time)
Anyways, not that it will change your mind, but I'd check out that movie (you can check it out on Netflix streaming if you are so inclined).
You shouldn't crow about $BIGNUM sales and then turn around and ask a broke government to hand over more money. It just seems ... spoiled and entitled ... to me. We're not a few dozen people in garages creating things. We're a bit, profitable (in places) industry. We should be able to take care of our own, and our past.
There's a reason why the corporate-run society that so many conservatives dream about has never existed. It's because it doesn't work.
No. the Libertarian Argument is that if it is worth doing it can be done by private citizens and organizations, not that it will be done. Perhaps you should help out yourself and then ask other to help out.
People will donate to causes they support.
Now with that said, has anyone asked EA or Activision or Nintendo or Sony or Microsoft to help preserve video gaming history?
Because the fed gov does.
What about war museums?
http://www.nationalww2museum.org/
Because the fed gov does.
What about history and art museums around the country?
Because the fed gov does.
The only rediculous thing here is the narrow focus of Pac-Man gobbling up your tax dollars.
That's because this is politics. Senator Coburn gets to put up a silly graphic of a giant pac-man eating up your precious quarters.
What about grants for health research?
Because the fed gov does.
What about grants for scientific research?
Because the fed gov does.
Frankly, I think museums in general preserve our evolving national heritage and history and I think it's entirely appropriate for the Federal Government to have a role in doing that.
Has there ever been a Supreme Court ruling on the constitutionality of federal grants to museums, science research (astronomy, physics, sociology, etc), health, or any other kind? The US Constitution is pretty vague. It's not the word of God. We're also a representative democracy. If Coburn is so concerned about grants, why doesn't he sponsor a bill to make non defense related grants illegal? I'm sure that would be popular.