Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
arrowPress Releases
February 12, 2016
PR Newswire
View All
View All     Submit Event

If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:

Keeping Classic Games Alive With GOG
by Josh Bycer on 12/02/13 01:53:00 pm

The following blog post, unless otherwise noted, was written by a member of Gamasutras community.
The thoughts and opinions expressed are those of the writer and not Gamasutra or its parent company.


This interview was originally posted on my site:

When CDProjekt made a surprising announcement five years ago to begin selling and re-releasing classic games for contemporary use, no one could have foreseen that Good Old Games would grow to become one of the biggest digital stores for not only classic games, but for modern ones as well.

Today,GOG.comhas become a major presence in the Game Industry and I had a chance to talk with them about the challenges that goes into getting these classic games onto the service and the growth behind GOG.


The following interview was done with Piotr Szczesniak: PR specialist at GOG

1. Let's start at the beginning; CD Projekt began as a game developer for The Witcher series. What led you guys to decide to branch out not only to become a digital store, but one focused on classic games?

This is not exactly true. Before CD Projekt Red development studio was conceived the company was a retail games distributor in Poland in the 90s. On a highly pirated market, with most PC slow on hardware specs one of their biggest successes was launching a series of classic gameswith budget-friendly prices.

The ability to convert a great number of pirates to legitimate, payinggamers brought about another idea. Why not go global with this approach? This is how theDRM-free digital distribution service that today is came to life. At first, "Good OldGames", as we were called back then, was only dealing with classic PC games. Since then wehave branched out to Mac and newer indie and AAA releases.

With so many contacts from theirretail distribution days, the founders of CD Projekt made it much easier for us to assemble thestarting catalog and expand rapidly. Just recently, on our 5 birthday, we found ourselves sittingon over 600 games from over 170 different partners.

2. Regarding the work that goes into getting a game onto the GOG site. Obviouslyone of the hardest parts of getting these games is acquiring the rights to reproduce the IP inthe first place. Without going into anything that would be considered NDA breaking, whatis the negotiation like to secure these classic IPs?

Most of the time it is a very time-consuming and difficult process indeed; going beyondacquiring the licenses, it's sometimes very difficult to even find out who owns the IP, as you'vesaid. Once we get that nailed down, signing is usually easier. After all, we're the #1 storeon the 'Net for classic content and gaming.


Convincing someone that this can work isn't thechallenge it used to be.

The main challenge is tracking down the rights holder or, variously if theIP is owned by a big company, that it's worth their while to work to uncover this cache of hiddencontent instead of work on new games.

3. One of the inherent problems with finding classic games is the fact that many of thesegames belong to studios that are no longer around. How does the process change (if at all)when it comes to these hard to find IPs?

These are the most time-consuming, difficult cases obviously. With existing companies it ismostly a matter of negotiation, with the defunct ones it's an exercise in fact finding. The rightsare often times owned by several entities and finding out who exactly has them and getting tothem is a hell of a task. With some games, likeSystem Shock 2, the process has its own ebb andflow.

Sometimes you almost abandon hope and then, miraculously, the game emerges ready fora future release. For a company that, at its core, has the utmost respect for the history of gaming,these moments, when we are able to bring back a true classic after months, sometimes years, ofcontinuous effort, feel empowering and incredibly satisfying.

4. Speaking of IP negotiation, one area that I'm really curious about is the difficulty. As withany consumer industry, companies can be very protective about their IPs and brands. Butfor companies that are no longer using the IP or simply acquired the IP from the originalowner, is negotiating for the IP in these cases any easier or harder and if so why?

It's a bit of a mixed bag: if a company doesn't have a plan in place for generating revenue froman IP that's lying dormant, it can be harder than usual to get them to consider it as a potentialsource of revenue. On the other hand, sometimes dormant IPs are easier to secure for GOG.combecause the rights holder is less worried on how the release of classic games will affect any plansthey have for a modern use of the license.

5. One last question regarding the process of acquiring IP rights before we move on. WhenI spoke with Farsight Studios, they discussed the fact that when they acquire the rights toreproduce a pinball table, that every one of their contracts is based on a limited duration ofhaving copyright ownership.

With GOG, when you guys acquire the rights to reproduce anIP, are the rights on a limited duration basis? I remember that there have been a few caseswhere GOG had to stop selling a specific game due to ownership issues.

We don't have the rights to reproduce any IP. We distribute the games for the rights holder.We generally never have problems renewing a distribution contract on unless therights holder that we have the title from had change hands.


It is not a matter of time-limited deal,but rather the case of the rights changing hands once again. Recently that was the case withAtari's catalog on, as the entire catalog of their IPs has been auctioned.

This meantnegotiating and drawing up contracts with current owners.

6. Over the years GOG has grown and branched out. One of the surprising additions to theGOG service would be the selling of present day games. Could you talk a little about therationale behind GOG moving in that direction?

Believe it or not, right at the start, we knew selling classics is just a beginning. The mostimportant issue with releasing newer games was (and still is) having the publisher agree togoing DRM-free. It was a natural step to not limit ourselves to old games when so many classicsstill inspire the indie scene and are being rebooted, re-imagined, or reincarnated as brand newprojects. We stick to our guns, meaning that we strive to release only quality games, developedwith great attention to detail and a lot of passion.

We keep it DRM-free and we try to providegamers with additional content while maintaining a flat worldwide price. So the philosophy remains intact, we are just expanding to include more gamers into our community.

7. Gamers have been doing their best to emulate classic games for years now, which hasbecome harder as technology continues to advance. On GOG's side, what games haveproven to be the hardest to get working on today's computers? And have there been anygames that for one reason or another were not able to be restored?

Early Windows 95 games--developed around the time of the shift away from Windows 3.11/DOS based systems towards new Windows--have proven to be a real pain-in-the-ass for our teamof programmers. Running 16 bit games on a 64 bit system (starting with Windows XP) is next toimpossible.

8. One of the best parts of GOG is that it provides an important service of preserving theseclassic games. One of the more often debated topics among older gamers is that oldergames offer deeper gameplay and are more creative compared to modern games.

Inyour opinion, what do you think draws people to play these classic games? Even thougharguably, many of them could be considered dated.

First of all they have much less of a tendency to lead you by the hand. A lot of modernmainstream games are sometimes dumbed down when it comes to their interface and gameplay,overrun by tutorials, and help pop-ups, the learning curve is flat. The challenge, especiallyfor more seasoned gamers, is not very demanding, so the pleasure of actually playing thegame is often short-lived.

The fact that big companies want to sell their big-budget games toEVERYONEsometimes means that the final product is diluted, undecided, and forgettable.Older games, especially those developed in the 90s were cheaper to make, and thus less boundby publisher's constraints.

The creators were able to develop their ideas uninhibited and thatsometimes produced true masterpieces with distinct, personal touch and unique mood. They didnot have a broad audience in mind but rather started out with "what game would I like to play?"approach.

9. Lastly, can you share with us what is next for GOG? You guys have done so much in thespan of 5 years and in your opinion, where else can GOG as a brand grow?

Well, I won't spoil it for you. Suffice to say we have big things coming in 2014. :)

Thanks again for taking the time to talk to me and I hope that GOG continues to be a success.

Related Jobs

Phosphor Games Studio
Phosphor Games Studio — Chicago, Illinois, United States

Gameplay Programmer (Possibly Remote/ Work From Home)
Phosphor Games Studio
Phosphor Games Studio — Chicago, Illinois, United States

Senior Engine Programmer (Possibly Remote/ Work From Home)
Big Fish Games
Big Fish Games — Seattle, Washington, United States

Senior Economy Designer
Hangar 13
Hangar 13 — Novato, California, United States

Dev QA Tester – Temporary

Loading Comments

loader image