Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
arrowPress Releases
August 21, 2014
PR Newswire
View All
View All     Submit Event





If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:


 
Slow Play Appreciation
by Keith Nemitz on 02/20/12 02:16:00 am   Expert Blogs   Featured Blogs

The following blog post, unless otherwise noted, was written by a member of Gamasutra’s community.
The thoughts and opinions expressed are those of the writer and not Gamasutra or its parent company.

 

This isn't the first article to promote the concept of Slow games. However, regular promotion is vital to this simmering cause. It's especially important to distinguish Slow games from casual games, at least for now. I believe, someday, casual games will BE the title for Slow games. By then, current casual games will have fallen into the bit bucket of insufficiency.


Slow games should be considered part of the Slow Movement which started with Slow food.

"Slow Food is an international movement founded by Carlo Petrini in 1986. Promoted as an alternative to fast food, it strives to preserve traditional and regional cuisine and encourages farming of plants, seeds and livestock characteristic of the local ecosystem. It was the first established part of the broader Slow movement."  -Wikipedia

Board Game Geek offers a FAQ. Their definition: 

"Slow games are long, epic games that focus on the experience. Slow games have lots of detailed rules and strong themes...  Slow Games are for connoisseurs who aren't fooled by plastic bits and other trashy stuff that doesn't add anything to the game."

Here's where video games get their own wagon. "...lots of detailed rules..." Certainly that is true of many simulation games, especially wargames, (Civ is the old man of Slow games), but the mainstream video gamer enjoys depth that comes from emergent play driven by sparse and/or obvious rules. Easy entry is important. Handing a rulebook to a Slow video gamer would not be a sign sophistication.

In 2009, Tale of Tales designers declared their game, 'The Path', was a Slow game. The concept didn't go much further. But smatterings can be found in Bioshock (take time to explore the environment/story) and Flower. Looking back, 'Myst' and 'Planescape: Torment' are good, Slow examples.

Except 'The Path' didn't help the concept. Slate's review ended:

"It's a promising path for games to take. If you want to see the seeds of how such a game might work someday, then The Path is for you. It's interesting, head-scratching, exasperating, and occasionally rewarding. Too bad it more often feels like a promising false start rather than a satisfying journey in its own right."

Which leads us to 'Journey'. That Game Company's 'Journey' might elevate Slow games into popular consciousness.

"Journey is an interactive parable, an anonymous online adventure to experience life's passage and their intersections. The goal is to get to the mountaintop, but the experience is discovering who you are, what this place is, and what is your purpose. Travel and explore this ancient, mysterious world alone, or with a stranger you meet along the way. Soar above ruins and glide across sands as you discover the secrets of a forgotten civilization."

Similarly Slow, are 'Dear Esther', 'The Snowfield", and I believe 'Witness' will be a game of careful, perceptual exploration, contemplation, and discovery.

A swell of inventive design has begun to expand Slow video games. The movement will strengthen as a new kind of player clamors for Slow game experiences. These are veteran players (core and casual) who grew out of fast, short, and/or shallow fun. There are many players ready right now. Some are finding classic substitutes: interactive fiction, Telltales's point-and-click adventures, puzzle fiction like Professor Layton and Puzzle Agent, and casual games like Puzzle Quest and Drawn 2. Some players have left games behind. 

Deeper, more insightful, emotionally rewarding, and absorbing gameplay will fully satisfy and re-entice paused gamers. Earlier works will become grandfathers.

I'm taking the Slow path for my next title. Three years in development, '7 Grand Steps' is about family generations surviving through the ages of western civilization. Here are some personal insights about an approach very different from Journey or Witness.

As a designer who loves historical fiction, (particularly Edward Rutherfurd's fiction) my game had to give personality to every generation. The player spends half-hour to an hour of gameplay, developing each family's story. After they pass, you can browse the graveyard and be reminded of what made each special.

The central mechanic had to be rich enough and fun enough to drive such an incredibly Slow experience. We chose one that suggests lives of endeavor. It's based on a board game mechanic that is easy to learn and rich with tactical opportunity. The larger game involves players strategizing how future generations will survive the changing ages.

Music in most games is either intense and short, or unobtrusive and repetitive. Neither is good for a Slow game. Note level, procedural music is one solution, but that requires incredible, specialized skills and time and money to do well. We thought of a trick that works for 7 Grand Steps. It allows us to play period appropriate, complex music in a way that doesn't interrupt contemplation. Like a stupid magic trick, we'll reveal it after the game has been released (and people have experienced the trick before being told the secret).

The only way (on an indie budget) to efficiently tell a 7000 year, historically detailed tale, told one life at a time, is with text. But the majority of gamers don't like to read. So we kept these interactive stories as short as flash fiction. They appear at spaced intervals, and the player isn't forced to read them.

Play-testing has shown that people are reading the stories. They read the situation, act, read the result and continue playing. That's good news, because the goal of 7 Grand Steps is to tell an incredible, personal story that connects billions today. To fully appreciate it, the game must be chewed and digested a little bit at a time.

Would the greatest mini-series of all time, 'Roots', have been popular if they'd shown it all at once? 

To support Slow play, the game is easy to start, quit, and resume. The tutorial holds the player's hands just long enough to learn the basics and then lets go. No loading screens, one-click skippable intro, the game is saved upon quit in less than a second. Even if the game crashes, you never lose more than one turn (about a minute of play).

Slow video games have a bright future. Quality experiences that promote reflection, meditation, and other powers of solitude will be appreciated by people either stressed or bored of meaningless challenges. Their numbers continue to increase.


Related Jobs

Digital Extremes
Digital Extremes — LONDON, Ontario, Canada
[08.21.14]

UI ARTIST/DESIGNER
Gameloft
Gameloft — Seattle, Washington, United States
[08.21.14]

Creative Director
Yoh
Yoh — Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
[08.20.14]

Rendering Engineer Job
Yoh
Yoh — Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
[08.20.14]

Multiplayer Designer Job






Comments


Bart Stewart
profile image
So no quicksave in 7 Grand Steps, then? ;)



Actually, I wanted to say thank you for writing this. It's a neat way of describing a particular approach to providing entertainment content. Not only is it satisfying in a conceptual way -- it's a useful way of thinking about how we perceive the world and design games -- it's also a practical guide for a specific game I'm trying to build. I knew generally what I've been groping toward, but this notion of "slowness" is a measuring stick for the features I might include in that game. Thanks!



One question does come to mind: if fast games (like fast food) are necessarily mass-produced, low-cost simple things in order to maximize volume, does it follow that slow experiences are best delivered as complex, individually-tailored experiences that are relatively expensive?



In particular I'm interested in whether slow games would tend to be designed as more player-centric, "you tell your own story" kinds of games than the tightly-defined linear games that are very popular today. Is a game like Minecraft a slow game? Are Valve games fairly understood as fast games?

Keith Nemitz
profile image
Although Minecraft does have time pressure, it's not at all frantic and the player has a lot of control over spending it. Strictly, I would say it's not Slow. But clearly, people are taking their time and enjoying Minecraft's depth.



A couple more solid examples: Frozen Synapse, Kudos and Democracy 2.



Frozen Synapse is a very challenging game, but it's not super hard to learn. Strictly, I would say it's Slow, but it's very much for special tastes.

Titi Naburu
profile image
At the last Global Game Jam, I ended up in a team that wanted to do a fast-paced, thrilling puzzle game (Steamballs). Eventually I left the team, took the existing code and did another similar puzzle game. Just to make things interesting, I decided to do opposite, and do a slow game (Concéntricos).

To make it slow, I used calm colours (slightly saturated yellow, green and brown, only blue was missing), a solid white background, and a wonderful looping soundtrack by another team member.

Concéntricos does have a clock, but it just goes forward and stops when you solve the puzzle, so you know how much it took and can beat your high score. But the point isn't to solve the puzzle before the countdown expires, as in Steamballs and a major mode of my previous game, ReVerSerers.

Also, the puzzle thing is more complex that usual, because there are complex graphic patterns that can't be recognized at a glance. Therefore, you must take time to see the pieces carefully and test them one by one.

I love racing games and action movies, but I also enjoy doing and playing slow games.

Titi Naburu
profile image
"Like a stupid magic trick, we'll reveal it after the game has been released (and people have experienced the trick before being told the secret)."

Hell no!!! We should establish some kind of Gavedev's Code, like the Magician's Code. We should share knowledge and wisdom on games, but only to dedicated gamedev sites (they can be open to the public, of course). But I strongly recommend not to shout around our tricks on E3 or Wired.


none
 
Comment: