More censoring... I guess they don 't want their brand associated with games for people below 18. If they don 't want people below that age to download games with a 18 rating they would probably be better off not selling those games at all. : This just sounds like ...
I was a bit unclear there, I meant that there are other companies not necessarily in the games industry that have a similar approach Google Inc . And as I said, I think it 's a good thing.
Not sure that a bigger amount of digital games would mean more harddrives would have to be manufactured. If you buy a game on a disc you would still install it on the harddrive which means they would take up the same amount of space. r nI would like to ...
I think it 's a bit patronizing too but you probably play some games differently today compared to how you did 5, 10, 20 years ago. You lose some skills but gain others so people might need to be educated/reeducated... But don 't think the learning curve is that steep.
If the developer lowers the recommended retail price then it wouldn 't be a problem for a third party to sell it at that price. The problem persists though that the game isn 't really used . r nAnother problem is that you can 't go sell other peoples IP ...
