Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
November 7, 2009
 
Iwata: 35% Japanese Connectivity Ratio For Wii, 20% For DS
 
iPhone Dev Storm8 Sued Over User Data Harvesting Allegations [4]
 
Game Boy, The Ball Admitted To National Toy Hall Of Fame
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
November 7, 2009
 
arrow On Bringing Modern Warfare 2 To Life [2]
 
arrow Games Demystified: Dissidia Final Fantasy [1]
 
arrow Building Social Success: Zynga's Perspective [3]
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
November 7, 2009
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Network Programmer
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Character Artist
 
Sucker Punch Productions
3D Environment Artist
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Texture Artist
 
Activision - Bay Area
Sound Designer
 
Crystal Dynamics
Sr. Level Designer
 
Sony Online Entertainment
Brand Manager
 
Activision - Bay Area
Environment Artist
spacer
Blogs

  What Do Games Amount To, Really?
by Lewis Pulsipher on 05/11/09 07:38:00 pm   Expert Blogs   Featured Blogs
5 comments
Share RSS
 
 
  Posted 05/11/09 07:38:00 pm
 

What do the systems of games amount to?

The goal here is not to list what the objective or victory condition is in a game, but to say “what the game amounts to” or “what is actually happening”, “what is the player actually trying to do?”

The biggest problem with this list is whether to include the psychological or just the “physical”.  Poker is about bluffing, about reading the other player, yet what the game amounts to in each hand is a form of pattern-matching plus collection (of money).  I think I’ll leave the psychological out of this list, and stick to the systems.

At some point another problem is, what is a game?  For example, I’d say most single-player video games are actually interactive puzzles, not games, but we call them games.  Fortunately, the list below also applies to many if not all puzzles.

“Achieve a particular state” is the generalized version.  Victory points are a generalized way of doing several different things at once.  Sometimes the “state” is very simple, as in rock-paper-scissors where you want to make a pattern, such as paper to the opponent’s rock.

The list includes the general activity, then some of the common variations.
When we come down to it, most games are about just a few things–in no particular order:

1.  Get to a particular place
    Get there fastest (a race) [player interaction may be missing]
    Get your any of your pieces there (Axis&Allies enemy capital)
    Get a special piece there (football, hockey, many other team sports)
    Get to end of the story (console RPGs)

2.  Collect something (many card games, many video games)(sometimes economic)
    Find something (exploration) (Easter egg hunt)
    It drops in your lap (draw a card)
    Take it from someone else (Monopoly, some card games especially trick-taking)
    Don’t collect something (Old Maid, Hearts, etc.)

3.  Wipe someone or something out (Risk, shooters, checkers, bowling!)
    Wipe out one thing—chess

4.  Achieve patterns in something (getting to a place could be seen as part of this!)
    Patterns in piece location (this includes rock-paper-scissors, Tetris, many puzzle games)
        Only your pieces (Tic-Tac-Toe), or yours plus opponent’s (rock-paper-scissors)
    Patterns in relation to the “board” (Scrabble, Carcassonne)
    Patterns of cards (related to sets–e.g. Canasta)

5.  Improve your capabilities. This is often subsidiary, a way to achieve something else.  Common in RPGs, vehicle simulations, construction/management simulation, collectible card games)

6.  Survive, Especially common in arcade games (which are generally unwinnable).
I’m not sure about “engine” games, where you’re trying to make the right moves to take full advantage of an often economically-based system.  In the end, you’re likely doing one of the six things above when you make a “right move”.

So what have I missed? I’m sure other people have made such lists, but I need references to such.

 
 
Comments

Christopher Wragg
11 May 2009 at 7:40 pm PST
profile image
What of the exact opposite to "wipe something out" being "defend something" Could technically fit under survival games, because a lot of games you defend something are survival games, eg tower defence games. But not exclusively, you could have it as a sub-point to many of the others, for instance to get to the end of the story something might have to survive (escort quests anyone?).

A lot of the points under #4 could just as easily be sub-points to #1, too often must you solve some pattern or resolve some mystery to achieve the ending of a story or get to a particular place.

Not 100% certain but where would a game like diplomacy fit? Because you don't win by getting to a particular place, but you do go somewhere and you do collect resource points. You have to survive, but you don't have to eliminate your opponents, there's also a lot of politics involved so perhaps some category for such diplomatic/political/interpersonal games. I suppose it could just be some hybrid of multiple points.

How about bluffing games? Where the entire point of the game is to convince an opponent to do something (Balderdash), not 100% certain if that can fit under the current list.

Mac Senour
12 May 2009 at 7:10 am PST
profile image
What about build something? Am I missing where that falls into one of the categories? I think Sim City falls under the "Build Something" header and I'm sure there are others. A game I worked on, Majesty, builds a fantasy city and then you go adventuring.

You can read more about game development in my blog.

Mac

http://aboutmakinggames.blogspot.com/

Grant Murakami
12 May 2009 at 10:58 am PST
profile image
How about music games? I figure they might fit into the pattern making category, but probably there should be something like a "Simon says" category. Receive instructions from the game, and push buttons in the right order.

Bart Stewart
14 May 2009 at 11:54 am PST
profile image
Interesting that all six suggested goals are about "achievement." Even exploration is described as just one means to the "collection" end.

Some additional possibilities for play goals -- which I think fit as squarely into "gameplay" as any of the items previously listed -- include:

* establish personal relationships with other players
* map a possibility space
- create a literal map of some physical space ("What's the best route from here to Sulex City?")
- understand the processes of an abstract space ("How does combat work?")
* construct a new thing
- produce new instances of predefined objects (crafting, or "building something" as Mac put it)
- design new kinds of objects or processes (e.g., City of Heroes "Mission Architect")

(Note: "mapping a possibility space" is not the same thing as finding individual tangible objects (collection) or achieving a pattern relationship among several objects. Mapping a space is not about producing a transient winning pattern -- it's about comprehending long-term relationships among objects and processes, which may or may not have competitive utility.)

I suspect this question about ways to "achieve a particular state" is high-level enough to provoke lots of debate about what fits that definition and what doesn't....

Lewis Pulsipher
26 May 2009 at 5:18 am PST
profile image
Thanks for your comments.

I've limited this list to the systems of games, not the psychological aspects, though I'll probably get to the latter in time.

Stewart Woods of Australia pointed me to a doctoral dissertation by Avi Jarvinen that describes in great detail the structural elements of a game. What I've been looking for here is what the player(s) actually do, both in system terms and in psychological terms, which is a different but related objective. If you're interested in the composition of games, read Jarvinen's Games without Frontiers: Theories and Methods for Game Studies and Design, downloadable via http://acta.uta.fi/english/teos.php?id=11046


none
 
Comment:
 


Submit Comment