My Message close
GAME JOBS
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
May 19, 2013
 
Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC
Sr. Network Systems Engineer
 
Treyarch / Activision
Technical Animator
 
Amazon Game Studios
Sr. Game Designer
 
Amazon Game Studios
Quality Assurance Manager
 
Amazon Game Studios
Lead 3D Environment Artist
 
Amazon Game Studios
Game Graphics Engineer
spacer
Blogs

  Book Review: Killing Monsters
by Rob Lockhart on 07/01/12 09:00:00 am   Expert Blogs
1 comments Share on Twitter Share on Facebook RSS
 
 
The following blog was, unless otherwise noted, independently written by a member of Gamasutra's game development community. The thoughts and opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of Gamasutra or its parent company.

Want to write your own blog post on Gamasutra? It's easy! Click here to get started. Your post could be featured on Gamasutra's home page, right alongside our award-winning articles and news stories.
 

Someone asked me if I would recommend that they read this book.  I swiftly said "No."  That doesn't mean I don't think that the book was worthwhile.  I'm very glad that this book exists, I just wish that no one actually had to read it.  Luckily for you, I jumped on that grenade and read the book -- so you don't have to!

The subtitle of the book is "Why Children Need Fantasy, Super Heroes and Make-Believe Violence."  The author's purpose is to justify the use of certain kinds of violence within popular entertainment, and to explain why kids can't get enough of this kind of entertainment, despite the popular claim that it is damaging to children.

The premise of the book is stated quite well on page 12, when the author, Gerard Jones, points out "when something troubles them [children], they have to play with it until it feels safer."  There are a few subtle variations of this point, but basically the idea is that children feel powerless and they self-medicate with power fantasies.

It's an idea I'm fond of, and one I hope is true.  Unfortunately there are about 215 more pages to fill, so this premise is restated many times over.

As I said, I have a lot of sympathy for the ideas in this book, but please allow me to play devil's advocate for a moment.  Gerard Jones is not a psychologist.  In fact he is a writer of comic books (conflict of interest?) who has held many workshops for children to create their own comics.  That is where he gets most of the stories he relates in the book.  The stories go like this: Jimmy was a troubled child with hippy parents, but then they let him have a toy gun and now he's fine.  There are probably 20 of these stories in the book.  Jones spends a lot of time dismissing the results of scientific research without citing any research with the opposite conclusion (which there might not have been in 2002 when the book was published).  Then he strings together a number of anecdotes, presumably hoping that they will magically coalesce into data, like so many zords forming a megazord.  They do not.

Now allow me to give you some quotes from the book if you'd like to be able to cite it without actually reading it:

Jones speaking about his mother: "...she saw my love of superheroes as coming from within me, not as something that had been imposed on me by the entertainment industry" p. 16

"Adult anxieties about the effects of entertainment are sometimes the real causes of the very effects that we fear most." p. 16

"Taking away the entertainment that enables them to grapple with reality won't make their reality better but may only leave them defenseless against it." p. 103

"'The games make me feel stronger' wrote one [child].  'I think me feeling stronger is what they don't want.'" p. 217

I do not recommend this book, but I recommend the idea of this book.  I hope you'll tell your friends about it.

 
 
Comments

Kerr Lockhart
profile image
Call me crazy, but what about, instead of sweeping assertions and anecdotes about his mother, the author cited some...what do you call it...oh yeah...data?


none
 
Comment:
 




 
UBM Tech