Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
arrowPress Releases
July 29, 2014
PR Newswire
View All
View All     Submit Event





If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:


 
Play This And Call Me In The Morning...
by Sebastion Williams on 05/19/10 02:57:00 pm   Featured Blogs

The following blog post, unless otherwise noted, was written by a member of Gamasutra’s community.
The thoughts and opinions expressed are those of the writer and not Gamasutra or its parent company.

 

It is always good to find a fresh perspective around an issue as hot as video gaming. I was encouraged by the article “Drop the Prozac, Pick Up a Game” on IGN.com. Emma Boyes does an outstanding job of collecting anecdotes and research that outline positive experiences in the video gaming community.

She references a study done by Carmen Russeniello, Ph.D. out of East Carolina University and commissioned by PopCap Games that finds that casual games can elevate moods and reduce stress, fatigue, tension and anger. He adds that the relationships between video games and people is complex, not well understood and do not indicate which games produce certain effects.

As a clinical therapist, parent and lifelong gamer, I have used computer and video gaming in much of my work and play and have done a great deal of non-scientific research and study around the use of gaming for assessment and therapy. After examining the nature of interactive media and video games in particular, I can say that the relationship between players and games is not as complicated as believed.

Players approach to games is the same as learning any new material - we observe, listen, read and respond. Each corresponds to a sensory relationship to the material presented and we utilize this approach to all media – books, music, movies and the like. The marked difference for the player is that we influence the outcomes of our experience; we have some measure of control based on out understanding and mastery of the material.

In addition to the players’ sensory approach to games, our intellectual strengths permit us to engage, understand and accomplish tasks within the experience. Our abilities to “wrap our heads around” a game largely determines what we get from it.

One basic tenet in psychotherapy is that an individual cannot be tense and relaxed at the same time so patients are taught to recognize the difference between tense and relaxed major muscle groups through conscious control. Preoccupation with stressful circumstances works in a similar fashion.

Players cannot focus on the source of their depression, anxiety or frustration when they are playing certain casual computer and video games. The visuals, sounds and, physics, icon manipulation and rules are simple and basic, the music is soothing and instrumental, the game play is engaging with slowly advancing levels of complexity and challenge and players can pause and stop to return to continue at any time.

Many would say that casual gaming is a nonproductive use of time but any time away from painful preoccupation is valued. Just ask a migraine sufferer about relief with analgesics.

Dr. Russeniello mentions in the study that older adults have benefited from exergames like Wii Fit to fight depression. Seniors who have previously enjoyed very active lifestyles are now restricted because of the limits that time places on the body. Video games that are ergonomically faithful to actual activity allow seniors to return to their favorite sports, learn new ones and compete with others without limitations.

Games with well-defined characters that grow and develop allow players to lose themselves in the experience. Their choices and consequences and displays of physicality engage us while liberal use of saves and “do-overs” let us experience the joy of eventual success without consequence to our psyches.

The horror stories of gaming gone bad are the massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPG) even the Entertainment Software Ratings Board (ESRB) resist rating. The never-ending, subscription-based, grinding experience can be fun in small doses but is not easily managed by those with addictive tendencies.

The player versus player (PvP) competitive aspects and voice chat permits online sociopaths to ply their trade anonymously and is a minefield for most of us who play to feel better or, at least, not feel like we’re back in school or work.

Video gaming is a natural extension for those familiar with play therapy resources and techniques. Aggressive boys already channel much of their energies into competitive sports simulations and first-person shooters. Kinetic learners gravitate to the guitar and band simulation titles. Those of us in the helping profession should take notice. Children suffering from trauma could use the Sims as an extension to doll play.

There is much research supporting a regimen of therapy and medication for optimal success in treating serious mental illness. Liberal but measured doses of video gaming can only help us get better at managing our situations and rebalancing our lives.


Related Jobs

FitGoFun
FitGoFun — Mountain View, California, United States
[07.29.14]

Unity 3D Programmer
Treyarch / Activision
Treyarch / Activision — Santa Monica, California, United States
[07.29.14]

Cinematic Animator (temporary) - Treyarch
Treyarch / Activision
Treyarch / Activision — Santa Monica, California, United States
[07.29.14]

Associate Cinematic Animator (temporary) - Treyarch
Activision
Activision — Seattle, Washington, United States
[07.29.14]

Software Engineer - Activision Seattle






Comments


D Luria
profile image
Lovely article -- I've spent a lot of thought on this topic, and am happy to see others have too.



I think from a purely experiential position, this is a well-known (although little-studied) aspect of game-playing psychology. My own experience of retreat into games during extremely stressful times is that even more than the substantial benefits that you mention, playing games of defined duration offers a specific value because they naturally return the player to external concerns at their conclusion. I think the greatest benefit of acquired successes in the less complex, solvable mental environment of a game lies in how well the games resolves and returns the player to other concerns. In contrast --



>>The never-ending, subscription-based, grinding experience can be fun in small doses but is not easily managed by those with addictive tendencies.



I see this dynamic in many theoretically innocuous social games -- they are grinders without any defined end. This concerns me because I believe a significant factor to the rapid growth of these games is that they appear to offer an available, affordable means of momentary escape from the stresses of our daily lives. Sadly, many people in our care-worn society who are picking up these games are naive to their own game psychology, and find themselves trapped by the game's mechanics. Not only do they lose the putative benefit of playing the game, they acquire an additional set of stressors trying to find the 'win' in game scenarios that aren't actually resolvable.


none
 
Comment: