Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
August 21, 2014
arrowPress Releases
August 21, 2014
PR Newswire
View All
View All     Submit Event





If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:


 
Simple keys to unlock the IAP puzzle for games
by Shyamal Dave on 04/30/14 04:28:00 am   Featured Blogs

The following blog post, unless otherwise noted, was written by a member of Gamasutra’s community.
The thoughts and opinions expressed are those of the writer and not Gamasutra or its parent company.

 

You can be an indie game developer, a developer at a gargantuan game-design studio, or an “monetization expert” (That’s a sexy title to have, ain’t it?), but no matter who you are, you’re concerned about the best way to monetize your game. A lot of people have developed theories and analyzed ‘strategies’ using graphs that freshly minted MBAs usually love to delve upon. While those are actually the basic requirements and you shouldn’t be ignoring them, they do lose out on many aspects of the process that a player goes through while interacting with the aspects of the game that provoke a purchase.

Here are some simple ideas that came up when, one evening, we brainstormed over a casual discussion on iAP at our studio. We hope to provoke some kind of thinking in your mind with these pointers:

Discussion Zone

Initiate with a social payment method

The key is to make players comfortable with the buying experience. Asking them to buy with “real money” at the first instance might be a turn off. Yes, people are purchasing from your game, but there are many others who haven’t made a single purchase yet. The ones that are not used to paying. There are tools like “pay with a tweet” that can at least help to drop the initial barrier that people have towards making an IAP.

Pay with a TWEET in Clumsy Ninja

Entice, don’t pull

In Glu’s Frontline Commando 2, at every stage, you are asked to pay for something or the other. The game keeps on prompting repeatedly for upgrading the weapon and the squad members. While it’s understood that such a complex game needs to have multiple levels wherein the player can opt for purchases, you can’t just force the player for a purchase this frequently. Find the necessary balance for your game!

Rather, a good way is to entice and not pull. For example, a good experience the game (Frontline Commando 2) has created is that of allowing the players to play a level that requires upgraded weapons but prompting them that the upgraded ones shall help clear the level.

Now that’s something that entices the player, even before the level is about to begin, and at the same time does not stop the player from checking out whether that’s actually true or not.

Frontline Commando 2 screenshot

Frontline Commando 2 screenshot

Make your UI sell

We have seen that developers are comfortable with creating great gameplays, designing good characters and thus improving the overall gaming experience. The user delight generated in making the user interface should be leveraged in making the entire buying process a good experience.

Prompts that do not disturb the experience of the player and at the same time remind of a key or a cheat that can help ease some level or get a power-up are great. For example, the tornado power-up in Mini Ninjas by Square Enix stays at the center-bottom of the screen, and the prompt to purchase potions is only between two runs, that too not intruding either the screen or the game-play. Also, the fact that they’ve not surreptitiously inserted a purchase prompt between ‘deaths’ gives a feel-good factor of the game (there’s a clear prompt for using your collected coins, further leading to a purchase if you don’t have enough).

Mini Ninjas screenshot

Mini Ninjas screenshot

Make the purchase meaningful

A lot of games have resorted to IAP-bundling and offer multiple utilities inside a package, and some utilities that have little or no difference on the game-play. For example, upgrading your bike’s parts in RedLynx’s Trials Frontier makes almost negligible difference, and you have to churn a decent virtual amount (or if you have finished that up then you need buy the coins).

If there are minor upgrades or changes that are a part of the storyline, ask the player to go through the story and upgrade the, as in Trial Frontier’s example, bike engine, but don’t make the player pay for something that’s not going to appear meaningful. After about three upgrades on the bike I could see no significant change. This is understood from the game-play perspective that the bike cannot fly after just 3 upgrades, and the change is going to minor, but then don’t charge a zillion bucks for such things!

Balance sources and sinks

Where is the player getting the currency (both premium and coins)? Where is he spending?

These sinks and sources should balance well. It’s a tad difficult to detail the math here as it depends on the game, but keeping this balance while designing the game-economy is crucial.

And in between these points there are a lot many other ideas such as combining merchandise with in-game purchases, time/recharge mechanics, spin wheel, magic box, et al.

Are you thinking of an awesome yet fair way of designing iAP in your game?

This blog post originally appeared on Mech Mocha Game Studios blog, here.


Related Jobs

Trion Worlds
Trion Worlds — Redwood City, California, United States
[08.21.14]

Senior Gameplay Engineer
GREE International
GREE International — San Francisco, California, United States
[08.21.14]

Senior Software Engineer, Unity
GREE International
GREE International — San Francisco, California, United States
[08.21.14]

Engineering Manage - Game Server
Deep Silver Volition
Deep Silver Volition — Champaign, Illinois, United States
[08.21.14]

Senior Audio Designer






Comments


Ian Richard
profile image
I actually have to disagree on Frontline Commando 2 being a good example. I recently played it, but quickly felt that it was "Spend or don't play!". Even the early levels felt like they were balance for premium guns... and the constant reminder that I can spend real money for a gun with 10 points of damage pushed me away.

I've seen a few better examples of "Enticing the player":

CSR Racing:
-----
Every few missions you get a call from your pal "I've got a hot deal on this new car!". These offer big discounts on random cars... including in-game cash vehicles.
It fit thematically to have a friend call with deal and it allowed me to try buying a car without resorting to real cash.
I knew what benefits a new car would bring long before spending real cash.

Plenty of Shooters: (Maybe even later into FC2)
----
I've played similar games to FC2 that have special "Use this premium gun!" missions that allow you to use upgraded weapons for free.
Being able to use the premium weapon and feel the difference was a far more effective way to entice me than "Damage + 10" on a menu.

RPGs
-----
I've played a few RPG that offer variations of "premium time" to new players. Early on, you get all the benefits of being a paying player and large bonus rewards for earning "Premium Cash". You get to feel what it's like to play the game as a premium without spending a dime.


Not sure how these methods did finacially but I figured I'd mention them as someone put off by FC2's model. I just find them more appealing because they let me know what to expect before demanding that I spend my hard earned cash.

Shyamal Dave
profile image
Hey Ian, I do get your point about FC2. That's exactly the reason I have started my point about "enticing" by criticizing the overall model, and have appreciated just the one specific aspect of their model.

The thing with IAP is that you need to be dependent on trial and error up to a certain extent. There's no prefect fit or model for any game. These methods shall evolve and become much better and feasible.


none
 
Comment: