Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
October 21, 2014
arrowPress Releases
October 21, 2014
PR Newswire
View All
View All     Submit Event

If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:

Four studies on videogame genre preferences
by Wai Yen Tang on 07/25/14 03:36:00 pm   Featured Blogs

The following blog post, unless otherwise noted, was written by a member of Gamasutra’s community.
The thoughts and opinions expressed are those of the writer and not Gamasutra or its parent company.


The Electronic Software Association’s statistics of the gender breakdown of people who play videogames is commonly cited pretty much everywhere. However, this statistic cannot answer further inquiries, such as the gender proportions across genres, play time, or even motivations to play videogames. There are motivational differences in gamers’ preferences for genres, such as competition, enjoyment in the broadest term, violence, thrill seeking among others. This comes from common perceptions among gamers as well as good number of studies.

I recently noticed two studies published just a week apart from each other. Tilo Hartmann and colleagues’ publication in New Media & Society and Johannes Breuer and colleagues’ publication in Communication Research Reports. Later in May at the International Communication Association’s annual meeting in Seattle, two more related studies were presented. Lotte Vermeulen and Jan Van Looy’s study on stereotype perception and Claudia Wilhelm’s study on gender stereotypes in gaming behavior.

Given that I am reviewing four studies instead of one, the amount of detail given to each is reduced accordingly.

The four studies examined factors in people’s preferences for videogame genres, although their different hypotheses complement each other. Hartmann and colleagues sought to examine the role of anticipated emotions of playing a violent videogame. Breuer and colleagues sought to examine whether adolescents, young and older adults’ aggressive personalities and motives for playing FPS and action games differ. Vermeulen and van Looy examined the intersection of the perceptions gender and gamer-related stereotypes. Wilhelm examined the influence of gender role orientations, its influence on videogame motives and genre preferences.

The four studies surveyed European respondents and their methodologies share some similarities and each study have their measures for meeting their respective research questions. They measured videogame genres (e.g. First-person shooter, sports, strategy, etc.), however the question posed and number of genres differ, Breuer et al. asked how much they liked the genres whereas the others asked how much they played the genres. Excluding Breuer et al., they assessed for videogame motivations (e.g. competition, challenge, needs, intrinsic motivations), although they differ based on their respective research goals. Breuer and colleagues surveyed through a telephone survey as part of a funded project whereas the other three surveyed respondents online. Hartmann et al. had respondents watch a trailer [Link] for Bad Company 2 and what sort of anticipated emotions they would feel if they played the game.


Hartmann and company conducted a structural equation model and this is what they found in graphical form.


The interpretation is that men play violent videogames more frequently than women as they anticipate more enjoyment and less guilt from playing Bad Company 2 (see blue lines). Indirect paths from gender to the anticipated emotions are also significant factors for violent videogame play (see green lines). Men are less empathetic which in turn led to less anticipated guilt. Men are more likely to morally justify violence which in turn led to greater anticipated enjoyment. When it comes to gratifications in game play (see red lines), men are more gratified with the need for aggression and thrills, but the need for aggression is a significant factor in one’s anticipated enjoyment which in turn led to violent videogame use.

Breuer and company

Some descriptive statistics, the adolescent group scored highest in terms of aggressive personality scores, time spent playing videogames and preferences for FPS and action games. The scores decrease from youngest group to the oldest.

The authors conducted three regressions to examine the relationship between preferences for FPS and action with (1) physical aggression, (2) anger, and (3) verbal aggression across all age groups accounting for gaming use, gender, education, self-efficacy and social support as control variables.

The relationship between physical aggression and violent game preference is significant across all age groups. The relationship is strongest among adolescents, and decreases with older groups. It held significant even when higher education and being a woman were negative predictors of physical aggression.

The relationship between anger and violent game preference is only significant for the adolescent group accounting for being a woman as another positive significant predictor for anger. Lower self-efficacy is also a positive predictor for anger for young and older adults.

The relationship between verbal aggression and violent game preference is not significant across all age groups. Self-efficacy and social support were positive predictors and education level was a negative predictor for verbal aggression.

Vermeulen and Van Looy

They presented two results. The first concerns about gender and videogame experience on stereotypical beliefs about videogaming. Through a 2 X 2 ANOVA, the gist is that individuals with less experiences with videogames held greater stereotypical beliefs about videogames (i.e. “it’s a pastime for boys, it’s for nerds, boys being better in gaming than girls). Interaction effects were found in that frequent gaming women disagreed more strongly that “gaming is a pastime for boys” (M= 1.72) from other groups (e.g. frequent gaming men, M = 1.98), the same is true for “boys are better at gaming than girls” (frequent gaming women, M = 2.03 vs. gaming men, M = 2.47).

In regards to motivations for playing videogame genres, a variety of main effects were found for the gaming genres, however these can be explained by interaction effects.

For causal genres which include puzzle and card games, significant predictors were women with a high level of motivation for gaming immersion and men with high motivation level for gaming control.

For heavy action genres which include horror and first-person shooters, significant predictors were motivations for competition, challenge and social contact (e.g. “I like to communicate with others while gaming”).

For growth genres which include MMOs and strategy, significant predictors were motivations for control, challenge, social contact, immersion, and being a man, although competition is a negative predictor. Interaction effects were found in that women with a high motivation levels for social contact, and immersion were significant predictors.

For linear progression genres which include adventure and platform games, significant predictors were motivations for challenge and immersion and being a man, but competition is a negative predictor. Interaction effects were found in that women with high motivation levels for social contact and immersion were significant predictors.

For sports genres which include sports and racing, competition was the sole significant predictor, immersion was a negative predictor. Interaction effects were found in that men with high motivation level for control and women with high motivation level for immersion.


Looking over the results section of the paper for a long time, I don’t think I can succinctly describe the many analyses as shown by this simplified model. The summary version is that gender roles (i.e. masculinity and femininity) have indirect influences on gaming behaviours (i.e., competitive, cooperative, goal-oriented, exploration), but directly affect gaming motivations and genre preferences. There are moderating factors, such as age and education. One example is that among lower educated respondents, masculinity has a greater influence on challenge and competition motivations.



My general take home message from these four studies is that there is a complicated flowchart in explaining why men and women play videogames. This theoretical flowchart would have several levels, gender as a continuum rather than a dichotomy (i.e. biological and psychosocial), motivations, personality, emotions, genre preferences, attitudes and beliefs, and gaming behaviours. The connections would have many one-way effects, two way effects and conditional effects as well. This is assuming that we take many demographical variables into account, such as education level, age. However, the theoretical flowchart’s individual components may not fit together because they were constructed from independent findings.

I offer some speculative thoughts to these studies. The studies surveyed respondents’ direct exposure to videogames, although I must point out this is a part of their exposure to videogames. Marketing could be considered as an indirect exposure to videogames and which further complicates the theoretical flowchart. I don’t have much marketing knowledge, but entertainment industries invest considerable resources towards marketing and thus it should be investigated. A frequent observation is that videogame marketing strategies often are reduced to using stereotypes to attract a specific audience or customer base (e.g. Behm-Morawitz, 2014; Scharrer, 2004). This targeted marketing would influence how men and women see each genre and further entrench gendered stereotypes about specific genres and about men and women’s belief who plays them. Men and women may dislike some aspects of a genre or motivation (e.g. violence or competition), but the studies do reveal liked aspects of a genre or motivation that game designers can develop and market into their game.


Breuer, J., Festl, R., & Quandt, T. (2014). Aggression and preference for First-Person shooter and action games: Data from a Large-Scale survey of german gamers aged 14 and above. Communication Research Reports, 31 (2), 183-196 DOI: 10.1080/08824096.2014.907146

Hartmann, T., Moller, I., & Krause, C. (2014). Factors underlying male and female use of violent video games. New Media & Society. DOI:10.1177/1461444814533067

Wilhelm, C. Gender Stereotypes in Gaming Behavior: Play Styles, Gaming Motives, and Genre Preferences. Paper presented at International Communication Association 2014 conference, Seattle, WA.

Vermeulen, L. & Van Looy, J.. “I Play So I Am?” A Gender Study Into Stereotype Perception and Genre Choice of Digital Game Players. Paper presented at International Communication Association 2014 conference, Seattle, WA.

Related Jobs

Treyarch / Activision
Treyarch / Activision — Santa Monica, California, United States

Senior UI Artist (temporary) Treyarch
Treyarch / Activision
Treyarch / Activision — Santa Monica, California, United States

Lead UI Artist
Treyarch / Activision
Treyarch / Activision — Santa Monica, California, United States

UI Artist/Visual Designer (temporary) Treyarch
Treyarch / Activision
Treyarch / Activision — Santa Monica, California, United States

Senior Character Artist (temporary) - Treyarch


Andrew Wallace
profile image
I find the last paragraph very interesting. Considering how narrowly marketers like to define demographics, I bet marketing has a huge impact on who plays games, possibly even more so than innate gender preferences.

Marvin Papin
profile image
I wonder about the question... "Did you feel guilty ?". About shooting pixels ?
It's like the theory of chaos. The simple fact of asking the question that could led to those results modify the results. And they care too much about violence. Is this about solo, MP ? probably solo, but what was the experience ?

That's all about analysing results but what gave them ? And how can we be impartial, not influence the people, find a representative part of the population, calculate that according to the previous experience.

Is virtual violence, violence ? How much people find it realistic ? is CoD MP realistic ?

Sorry, but seriously... And then, you found in a newspaper : Video games make teens psychopaths.

But, the people involved in the analysis probably never touched a video game (hyperbolic view)

Some details are probably in the paper but I bet that's not relevant. They instead should care about the realistic level of the involved video game and how people get emotionally involved. Try to reproduce reality, or just bumping buttons to make things that leads to reward ?

Here is all about : Video game violence and it's already a lack of objectivity. IMHO

Jeanne Burch
profile image
To the question of feeling "guilt" over pixels being a matter of suggestion:

I played Everquest 2 for almost a decade. There is an area called "The Commonlands" that is supposed to be an African-type savanna, complete with African-type animals like elephants and rhinos. I never killed either even for quests, because they're endangered species in the real world and no matter that they were pixels, I couldn't feel right about it.

There is a quest on the way to getting an epic weapon for the berserker class that involves killing hundreds of tigers. I started the epic line because it's a cool thing I wanted to have, but I eventually balked at killing more tigers and gave it up (much to the surprise/dismay of my then-guild, since I would have been the first berserker in the guild to have a shot at the epic). Yes, still pixels, but again, I couldn't feel right about it.

This happened quite a while ago, and I certainly wasn't part of the study, so my personal guilt wasn't dependent on someone else suggesting that I SHOULD feel guilty.

Marvin Papin
profile image
So in that case you couldn't detach emotionally even at a low realistic level probably by the fact that the game compensate it by the involvement level of an MMO.

But in that study, no level of emotional involvement or realism assimilation is taking in count.

It's also about perception. In Everquest, you probably had to kill other animals like hounds. They can attack you but in real life, that could be about self defense, while some people could feel uncomfortable, other in that case are more subject to a Gameplay Mechanic / Reward case.

I think it's a to much complex subject. Stats does not fit, the usual devs debate are not about math and fit a way more. It's all about analytic companies who are looking for things to analyze and it spreads more about sensible subjects.

Bart Stewart
profile image
While I don't object to studies like these, they give the impression of being narrowly focused on sociopolitical interests: aggression, violent games, stereotyping.

(Incidentally, if a group shows a pattern of preference for something, it's not an erroneous use of a stereotype to conclude that a sufficiently large subset of that group will probably express that same preference pattern. It's only a stereotype when you assume that some individual who happens to be a member of that group must share the whole group's preferences. If the data show that men prefer action games, it's not stereotyping to market such games to men. That's not to say one can't or shouldn't market action games to women, or farming sims to men, or whatever; it's simply pointing out that if group preferences are real, then marketing to groups is justifiable from a return-on-cost perspective. [See Willie Sutton's comment.])

I'd be more interested in a broader data collection that obtained simple demographic results -- age and sex, certainly, but possibly also things like education level, job type, income level, number of games played per month, and home region -- from players of a very wide range of games across many platforms. Identify the key traits of these different kinds of games (as at least one of these studies did), then run the numbers and examine the highest and lowest correlations between game traits and demographic values.