|
This will be brief.
Sunday was my birthday and it also marks the third of a century I've spent in video games (started as a play-tester at Avalon Hill Computer Games in 1979). In addition to the slew of Facebook birthday wishes one would hope to get, I got this heated Facebook IM Session:
Flame:
Please stop creating games that harm our society and rob kids from their parents. Please tell me how you can sleep at night?
My Reply:
The average age for players in Word Carnivale is 40+, the biggest segment is 35 to 54 year olds, followed by 55+ and then 25 to 34 year olds. 85% women.
I have done children's educational games, and in our crossword game (also tends to older players) we have children's puzzles to teach vocabulary etc.
No violent games.
Flame:
Not good enough. I read the NYT article. You need to implore your industry to do much better, damn you all.
Give it some thought
My Reply:
I don't do harmful games. Never have
Finally I said:
I haven't worked at Activision since 1994. I am guessing you think I'm still there. (I was the VP of Tech there at the time)
And then this reply:
My mistake. Thanks for clarifying.

Interesting, because for the last almost 20-years I have been working in educational/casual/children games.
There's a lot of anger about this issue. Just noting that.
Something we need to think about.
|
Not that there isn't a day that goes by that I wonder why I left, given the incredibly difficult nature of the mobile social game market :-)
I could have missed some coverage of StarCraft specifically in the segment before I started watching but I'm willing to bet that there was an unintentional disconnect between the background graphics and the spirit of the piece - someone probably said "prepare video background for violent video games" and it was mashed together. The impression anyone who didn't know about StarCraft would take away is that it was a violent military FPS. It's easy for things to be misinterpreted (or even intentionally manipulated) like that.
Do you have a guess at the NYT article that might have sparked the emails?
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/18/a-rising-chorus-but- not-quite-cons
ensus-on-guns/