By Mark
Steven Miller

August 14, 1998
Vol. 2: Issue 32
|
I did a number of conversions on my older yet
still functional PowerMac 7100/66 with a Digidesign ProTools II audio card
installed (with the 442 interface) to test the products' performance. In
general, WaveConvert Pro was somewhat faster than BarbaBatch in most
circumstances. For example, one minute of stereo, 44.1KHz, 16-bit digital
audio converted to 8-bit and a slightly nonstandard rate of 110,029Hz with
normalization and peak limiting took WaveConvert Pro one minute and forty
seconds to process; BarbaBatch performed the same conversion in two minutes
and thirty seconds.
Perhaps the most important metric of all is how the results sound. Again,
I did many listening tests on a variety of files converted in many different
ways. I won't present the full details, but I'll instead give my overall
conclusions. To do my listening test, I chose to forgo the rarefied environment
of the recording studio and opted instead for a typical high-end multimedia
PC listening environment. Using a Creative Labs AWE64 Gold card and a Cambridge
SoundWorks PCWorks subwoofer/ satellite-amplified speaker system, I turned
the volume up fairly loud to compensate for the ambient noise of the machine.
The files I processed were 16-bit, 44.1KHz music and voice-over files from
the last game I worked on. All of the files were produced on mid-level
professional equipment, such as a Mackie 8*Bus board, AT 4033 microphones,
Tascam DAT machines, and K2500 and Samplecell samplers, and were reasonably
free from noise and distortion. I also tested some really poor-quality files
from an outside contractor just to see what kind of repair work was possible.
BarbaBatch presents a very nice, natural, open sound for all of its conversions.
The BarbaBatch sample-rate conversion algorithm is very effective. Music
files converted with BarbaBatch retain the most natural, least processed
sound. WaveConvert Pro music files tend to have a more processed, filtered
sound, even with minimal conversions (such as 44.1KHz to 22KHz only). WaveConvert
Pro, on the other hand, did the best job with 8-bit conversions. Its wider
variety of signal processing options and excellent set-up libraries yielded
much cleaner, quieter lowÐbit-rate files. WaveConvert Pro was also much
more useful in cleaning up my poor-quality audio files.
I also tested the files on an inexpensive set of Labtec speakers. In this
case, the WaveConvert Pro-processed files sounded clearer, and artifacts
from the sound processing were much less noticeable than on the higher-end
consumer audio hardware.
|