It's free to join Gamasutra!|Have a question? Want to know who runs this site? Here you go.|Targeting the game development market with your product or service? Get info on advertising here.|| For altering your contact information or changing email subscription preferences.
Registered members can log in here.Back to th e home page.

Search articles, jobs, buyers guide, and more.
 

Letters to the Editor

 

Letters To The Editor:Submit A Letter
View All Letters

 

 

02.14.2007

If Gamecock is G.O.D. retreaded, forget it.
Gathering of Developers (G.O.D) began life as an inspiration and ended as an embarrassment. They put a brilliant manifesto on the web promising to do right by developers, which was all to the good. Then they took a booth to E3 that was so outrageously sexist and exploitive that even the E3 management (which at the time was pretty damn tolerant of barely-clad booth babes) wouldn't let it in the door, so G.O.D. had to set up their pole dancers in a parking lot across the street. Female indies who might have been attracted to G.O.D. by the manifesto were firmly told that it was a boy's club.

Sure, the stunt attracted vast numbers of sex-starved young men to the tent, but few of them were buyers for the big retailers. Amazingly enough - and I know this idea will startle some people - it takes more than pole dancers at a trade show to make a publishing company successful.

So now we have Gamecock, founded by the same people. That choice of name may be intended to suggest the fun of watching chickens peck each others' eyes out, but it was obviously selected for its other connotations as well, and once again, females are clearly not part of the vision. If Gamecock is just G.O.D. all over again, skip it. Why should anyone do business with someone whose judgment is that poor?

-Ernest Adams
 



join | contact us | advertise | write | my profile
news | features | contract work | jobs | resumes | education | product guide | store