Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
November 21, 2009
 
Video Game Watchdog National Institute On Media And The Family Shutting Down [9]
 
Modern Warfare 2 Infinity Ward's 'Most Successful PC Version' Yet [3]
 
New Tech, Design Details Of Project Natal To Emerge At Gamefest In February
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
November 21, 2009
 
arrow Upping The Craft: Susan O'Connor On Games Writing [5]
 
arrow Small Developers: Minimizing Risks in Large Productions - Part II [6]
 
arrow iPhone Piracy: The Inside Story [48]
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
November 21, 2009
 
Planckogenesis, Part II: Song Structure & Gravy Train
 
Designing Games Is About Matching Personalities [1]
 
An Indie Developer’s “Biggest Mistake” [9]
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
November 21, 2009
 
Monolith Productions
Sr. Software Engineer, Engine - Monolith Productions - #113767
 
Sony Online Entertainment
Brand Manager
 
Crystal Dynamics
Sr. Level Designer
 
Gargantuan Studios
Technical Art Director
 
Gargantuan Studios
Lead World Designer
 
Microsoft Game Studios
Multiplayer Game Design Lead - Halo
 
Warner Bros Games
Sr. Concept Artist - WB Games (Chicago Location) - #114692
 
Warner Bros Games
Sr. Software Engineer, Gameplay - WB Games (Chicago Location) - #115557
spacer
About
spacer News Director:
Leigh Alexander
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Editor At Large:
Chris Remo
Advertising:
John 'Malik' Watson
Recruitment/Education:
Gina Gross
 
News

  Gibson Challenges Activision Over Guitar Hero Patent
by Christian Nutt
1 comments
Share RSS
 
 
March 12, 2008
 
Gibson Challenges Activision Over  Guitar Hero  Patent
Advertisement
According to a Reuters report, guitar manufacturer Gibson and Activision have entered into a legal discussion over Guitar Hero, with Gibson alleging that the game violates a 1999 Gibson patent.

Despite entering into a licensing agreement with Activision to replicate Gibson's guitar designs for Guitar Hero III, Gibson is alleging that Activision violated one of its patents, which governs "technology used to simulate a musical performance" according to the Reuters story. Activision has responded by filing a lawsuit that seeks to invalidate Gibson's claims for damages.

As quoted by Reuters, Gibson's letter to Activision of January 7 reads, in part, "Based on our preliminary analysis, the 'Guitar Hero' software (including any expansion packs) and the guitar controller provided by Activision being used as a musical instrument (packaged with the software or sold standalone) are covered by the... patent... Gibson requests that Activision obtain a license under Gibson's... patent or halt sales of any version of the 'Guitar Hero' game software."

According to Reuters, Activision's general counsel George Rose responded to the allegations with a statement reading, "Gibson is a good partner, and we have a great deal of respect for them. We disagree with the applicability of their patent and would like a legal determination on this."

Interestingly, this case may grow more complex when viewed in the context of patent agreements Activision is already engaged in. As exclusively reported by Gamasutra shortly before the game was released last year, Activision has both purchased patents from third parties and licensed patents from Guitar Freaks creator Konami which cover aspects of gameplay and interface in the Guitar Hero series.

This is the second troublesome legal problem revolving around Guitar Hero to come to light today; earlier, reports surfaced that original franchise developer Harmonix filed and then withdrew a lawsuit against the company seeking more than $14.5 million in royalties for Activision's continuation of the series.

[UPDATE: 03/12/08 - Clarified that Activision is litigating against Gibson, after the guitar company challenged Activision in non-court filed letters.]
 
   
 
Comments

Caswal Parker
profile image
As I was reading this I was thinking what about Guitar Freaks, pondering about when it came out. According to good ol wiki it was Feb 1999 which surely would count as prior art as it would of been in development through out 1998.


none
 
Comment:
 


Submit Comment