Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
September 1, 2014
arrowPress Releases
September 1, 2014
PR Newswire
View All





If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:


Opinion:  GTA IV : The Immigrant Issue
Opinion: GTA IV: The Immigrant Issue
May 1, 2008 | By Simon Parkin

May 1, 2008 | By Simon Parkin
Comments
    4 comments
More: Console/PC



[In his debut opinion piece, also printed on sister editor blog GameSetWatch, British games journalist and producer Simon Parkin takes a look at protagonist Niko Bellic, arguing that criticism that he unfairly plays up Balkan stereotypes and immigrant plights borders on the ridiculous.]

Niko Bellic is the most likable Grand Theft Auto protagonist we’ve yet seen.

He’s smart, funny, loquacious and you get the feeling that his brushes with (and reluctant employment by) Liberty City’s criminal underworld are born from poverty and necessity rather than an inherent tendency toward violence and viciousness.

He’s seen things.

This much we know from his infrequent moments of soul-bearing wartime recollection (which never feel forced) and so he exudes the kind of scarred, tough maturity that comes from surviving the bleakness of battle rather than the posing immaturity of so much gangsta pastiche.

That Rockstar decided to cast the player as an illegal immigrant for their hero is cause for celebration, not eye-rolling derision. He is an asylum-seeking protagonist with more depth and character than ten thousand lantern-jawed American heroic archetypes.

In fact, his portrayal (at least to those with half an eye open) should do more to warm viewers to illegal immigrants than any of the (nevertheless awesome) characters in, say, the culturally-acclaimed TV series, The Wire.

As a result, the press statement from the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants saying that the game’s portrayal of a Balkan in the game plays on untrue stereotypes seems ridiculous.

It’s the kind of accusation that could only be directed at the game from a brief reading of its synopsis (if that) rather than extended time spent in Niko’s shoes. GTA IV’s world is ethically diverse, with law abiding citizens and criminals alike drawn from a wide range of creeds and races and to argue that it promotes racial stereotyping is to disastrously miss the point.

Indeed, my experience of the game has been to find that Niko’s level-headedness, character and sense of justice (a skewed but consistent moral standard that reminds me of that of Anton Chigurh in the Coen Borthers’ latest, No Country For Old Men) has influenced the way I’ve been playing the game.

Whereas in previous iterations I wouldn’t think twice of car-jacking a vehicle to get from A to B as quickly and effectively as possible, in assuming Niko’s role I feel more comfortable hailing a taxi cab and paying a fare for the journey.

Besides the fact that viewing the city from the back of a cab is a lovely way to pass 5 minutes, the game is clever in its use of inconvenience as a deterrent to ‘unnecessary’ crime. Why not take a cab when, in doing so, there’s no risk of a police pursuit or the irritation of having another ‘death’ blighting your stat record?

The increased fidelity of the city and its citizens therein raises the sense of immersion and the sense of virtual responsibility. Previously games would have to rely on asset-based penalties to encourage their players to ‘do right’ in a game world (e.g. by removing some in-game currency or hard-won weapons as a deterrent).

But as the realism of open game worlds increases they are more able to rely on a player’s real-life sense of justice and fairness to temper their behaviour.

GTA IV, ironically - when considering the media backlash it has already generated - is very effective at this pressing of responsibility back into the player’s hands – hence now you get to keep your weapons after you get sent to the hospital.

There are, of course, scripted moral decisions to be made in the game (do you step on your enemy’s fingers and let him drop to his death from the roof top or hoist him up to safety).

But more important than these are the thousands of incidental moral and ethical decisions that must be made through the natural course of play. There is an excellent blog site to be written by somebody who tries a victimless play-through of the game.

There is much that needs to be written about the issues GTA IV’s realism raises for gaming. Gamers are, of course, already on the back foot in defending their hobby and, specifically, this game from the blind onslaught of the mainstream, faux-outraged media.

But the deeper, more real and true issues the game raises deserve proper appraisal and criticism – especially from those who understand their implications. However, Niko’s status as an illegal immigrant is certainly not one of them.


Related Jobs

Zindagi Games
Zindagi Games — Camarillo, California, United States
[09.01.14]

Software Engineer
Zindagi Games
Zindagi Games — Camarillo, California, United States
[09.01.14]

Lead/Senior Designer
N-Fusion Interactive
N-Fusion Interactive — Manalapan, New Jersey, United States
[09.01.14]

Unity 3D Game Designer
Retro Studios - Nintendo
Retro Studios - Nintendo — Austin, Texas, United States
[09.01.14]

RETRO STUDIOS - Level 3 Engineer










Comments


Anonymous
profile image
I like this article. I'm generally not much for GTA though I can see it's charms, but I'm always annoyed when reviewers thrash a game for some minor bit of 'possible' political incorrectness and such. A good example of this was FOX news' coverage about Mass Effect having a 'fully interatctive sex scene' in it. I've seen said scene. It is nether blatant nor is really intereactive in any way than to do it or not.

And what annoyed me the MOST about the people talking about it, none of them had actually played the game and they all admited it on camera. The pure lack of research there staggers me. Then again most media like FOX news is looking to cash in on controversy so I guess I shouldn't really be suprised.

Anonymous
profile image
Just to correct you on a point you made, you only keep your weapons when you die and are sent to the hospital. All your weapons are taken from you when you get arrested. You lose money in both instances however, so I fail to see how that is not an asset based penalty.



In fact it is even easier to evade the police this time around, so that enables players to kill all sorts of innocent people for no reason. Not to say that's a bad thing though. :)

Simon Carless
profile image
Oop, thanks, anonymous - we removed 'get busted by the police' from that sentence, at least - since that was technically incorrect.

Tynan Sylvester
profile image
It's always how, as far as I can tell, 100% of the people who support broad censorship of games like GTA3/4 have never really played them.



Even in GTA:SA, I noticed that the storyline itself has a very strong anti-drug theme. Haven't played GTA4 yet but it seems clear that it's another game that is easy to vilify, but only for people who have never really experienced it.


none
 
Comment: