Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
February 10, 2010
 
Analysts: EA On The Right Track At Last
 
GamesBeat@GDC Confirms OnLive, GameStop, PlayStation Home Speakers
 
Ubisoft Q3 Sales Edge Down, As It Ramps Up Big Franchises
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
February 10, 2010
 
arrow Television, Meet Games
 
arrow Two Halves, Together: Patrick Gilmore On Double Helix [1]
 
arrow The Road To Hell: The Creative Direction of Dante's Inferno [20]
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
February 10, 2010
 
Lineage 2 Interview - 'Freya Update Is Just a Beginning' - Pt.2
 
Fixing the GDC 2010 Schedule Builder [3]
 
Swashbuckling for Landlubbers: Why you may already be encouraging piracy! [20]
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
February 10, 2010
 
THQ
Animator - Motion Builder (contract)
 
LucasArts
Senior Systems Designer
 
Trion Redwood City
<b>Sr. Brand Manager</b>
 
Telltale Games
Game Designer
 
Telltale Games
Senior Software Engineer - Core Technology
 
Airtight Games
IT System Administrator
 
Roblox
Apple Game Engineer - Kids' Virtual World
 
Roblox
Senior Web Engineer (front-end)
spacer
About
spacer News Director:
Leigh Alexander
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Editor At Large:
Chris Remo
Advertising:
John 'Malik' Watson
Recruitment/Education:
Gina Gross
 
Feature Submissions
About
spacer If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these Think Services sites:

Game Career Guide (for student game developers.)

Indie Games (for independent game players/developers.)

Finger Gaming (news, reviews, and analysis on iPhone and iPod Touch games.)

GamerBytes (for the latest console digital download news.)

Worlds In Motion (discussing the business of online worlds.)

Game Set Watch (the Group's alt.game weblog.)
News

  The China Angle: Should The Government Intervene Over Online Games?
by Frank Yu
8 comments
Share RSS
 
 
September 3, 2008
 
The China Angle: Should The Government Intervene Over Online Games?
Advertisement
The Olympics are over and life is returning to semi-normality to Beijing and China, if you count another earthquake and the Para-Olympics normal.

In a reminder of when the term 'China Games' did not mean the Olympics, a Committee of China’s National People’s Congress this week has classified games that depict too much violence, porn or not enough Chinese patriotism as being “unhealthy.”

The committee recommends more monitoring and even automatic log off when players reach a certain time allotment.

From a recent report:

"Li Jianguo, vice-chairman of the National People’s Congress said that Internet-addicted teenagers account for about 10 percent of China’s web users. With more than 200 million Internet users in China, that’s millions of "unhealthy" young Chinese and a huge business for "unhealthy" game developers."

Ten percent of anything in China is a huge number, and will no doubt continue to rise along with government intervention. For many developers in the West, this sort of government regulation and oversight of the industry seems both odious and intrusive. I thought so too -- but now I’m not so sure.

After seeing the business models and game design of the current crop of Chinese online games, I would have to agree that the industry in China is heading towards games designed to be addictive and to essentially suck the consumer money out as quickly and efficiently as possible.

I am a bit torn by this, as a believer that game designers are like artists and need to express themselves. The current business situation for games in China requires that games be designed like fast-moving consumer goods, trendy fashion items, and in some cases, like drugs.

Due to piracy and the lack of a PC retail game market (and a lack of consoles), the free-to-play model has become the dominant model for game companies in China in the last 5 years.

Many games can be played with a free download or a free registration on the web. Some sites rely on traffic and advertising to make their money, but most games now rely on the sale of virtual items and special access in order to make their revenue and growth targets.

Limited items, power-ups, special events, and seasonal gifts are the fuel that powers the Chinese game industry. For games like Zhengtu Online or Tencent’s "skill-based" gaming, there are elements of gambling, wagering and lottery within the games that border on legality since winnings cannot be transferred back into cash, although it does take real money to take a chance.

Many of these games are designed to be easy for new users and curious players. Once they get sucked in through fast leveling or the network effect of their friends playing as well, players need to invest in special items and more time in order to reach ever-higher levels and challenges.

Although this is common for most MMORPGs even in the West, the nature of free-to-play means that, without recurring monthly subscriber revenue or up-front game purchase, free players need to be both emotionally invested in the game and their characters to make the all-important conversion into virtual item-purchasing customers and recoup the cost and investment of initial free-to-play.

Unlike traditional notions of video games with a conclusion or even a winner, Chinese online games do not end -- they just continue on to the next challenge and ever more virtual item purchases. In the Western climate, there are other alternative games, platforms and experiences that the gaming public can choose from.

Yes, there are advanced casual game portals where dancing, racing or sports games have a definitive winner, but in most cases, players still need to purchase more items, accessories or new levels.

Winning - or gaining power - in online games in China is as much about purchasing items as it is about skill or hard work. This is the reality of the business of games in China, so the designers and developers need to make their games based on this strategy.

It's not evil, it's business.

If designers and developers had other business alternatives to monetize their games, they would if they could. For now, they design the games to painlessly help users spend ever larger sums of money on virtual items. I’m sure Western publishers are looking at and exploring this model as well.

That is why government intervention in the industry is not, offhand, a bad thing. The challenge is if the government can regulate this industry without stifling further evolution, or worse. Regulations may lead to the heavy-handed restrictions that merely solidify the base of the large profitable companies that can comply more easily and stamp out newer, younger startup competition.

Instead of focusing on the content of the games, the regulators need to focus on the industry's business model. With some trepidation, the Chinese game industry has crossed a line somewhere where the gaming experience model is not based on fun, but a psychological and social compulsion to play.

Among cases where regulation of an industry is needed, this may be the one where the market cannot or will not correct itself.

[Frank Yu is an founding advisor to Cineo. Prior to his current position, Frank started and led the first China game team for Microsoft Casual Games. He has also served as the first Regional Business Manager in Asia for the Xbox and Home Entertainment Division. He can be reached by email at capital@gmail.com.]
 
   
 
Comments

Tynan Sylvester
profile image
If the government is going to get involved, they shouldn't be suppressing the games they have. They should be focusing on creating a market where people can sell a 3-12 hour game with an ending and make a profit.

As long as the Chinese market is drowning in piracy, perpetual comulsive grinds are the only design model possible.

michael franchina
profile image
government regulation is never the answer. its up to individuals to decide for themselves whether or not a game, or anything for that matter, is right for them. No one is forcing these people to play these games. The government taking away choices for people, is taking away their right to choose.

Hélder Gomes Filho
profile image
So michael, you think then that for the right to choose, the governments should allow people to take drugs, since they choose to?

If people can use bad games, why not drugs? (well, alcohol and cigarrete is allowed already anyway...)

Yannick Boucher
profile image
I think some of the commenters should come over to China and see the market for themselves... It's a mess that needs a little clean-up... Frank, you have that link that recalls the story of a woman who was addicted to ZT Online and lost everything ? ;)

Anonymous
profile image
As for the piracy issue, well, it's a bit more complicated than that... in China, the line between 'pirate' and 'legit owner' is very blurry. More often than not, the money gained from piracy is used to make new productions, which are then distributed widely through the piracy market. Think of it as lower margins, but higher volume... and there are police and government officials mixed up in there, so it's really really not easy.

Dan Taylor
profile image
Wow...this is an interesting view that we rarely see on this rapidly expanding market. I'm not entirely sure that it's just the Chinese games that are building a psychological and social compulsion to play. While the Goliath in the room (WoW) certainly IS fun to play, you've got to admit that there's a certain amount of social compulsion to play.

@Yannick - I've searched for the ZT Online story but am coming up empty, can you share it?

William Lin
profile image
Addiction is definitely fun.

frank yu
profile image
Here is the link to the ZT story. http://www.danwei.org/electronic_games/gambling_your_life_away_in_zt.php

thanks for your comments guys


none
 
Comment:
 


Submit Comment