Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
arrowPress Releases
April 24, 2014
PR Newswire
View All





If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM TechWeb sites:


Opinion: Why Is Nintendo Lagging On Wii Video?
Opinion: Why Is Nintendo Lagging On Wii Video?
December 5, 2008 | By Colin Dixon

December 5, 2008 | By Colin Dixon
Comments
    9 comments
More: Console/PC



[Both Sony and Microsoft's consoles have made aggressive moves into the realm of video delivery, but what about Nintendo? Analyst Colin Dixon of The Diffusion Group looks at the potential and associated challenges for nongaming media on Wii -- and wonders whether Nintendo can afford to stand on the sidelines any longer.]

With the launch of the new Xbox LIVE Experience – and the addition of Netflix video streaming – Microsoft continues to transform its Xbox 360 from a solitary ‘gaming platform’ to a connected video gateway delivering content directly to the living room TV.

Sony is working the same angle, advancing its PS3/Playstation Network combination by expanding its roster of movies and TV programs and even pledging simultaneous online and DVD releases of Hitch and other top-notch (Sony-owned) titles.

Sony’s ambitions for the Playstation Network are incredibly grand: tie together Sony content, Sony’s distribution machine, Sony’s Internet media services, and Sony’s (connected) consumer electronics, thus building an end-to-end system to bypass video operators and deliver content directly to end-users. Sony’s own public statements have unambiguously revealed this ambition.

So that brings us up to date on Microsoft and Sony, but what about Nintendo?

Given the Wii’s explosive diffusion (over 35 million points of presence at year-end 2008) and cross-market appeal (helping to bring console gaming into the mainstream), Nintendo would seem to put be in an ideal position from which to launch a highly-competitive video delivery service.

To date, however, it has remained relatively silent on the issue of Wii-based video delivery. Outside of a low-level relationship with the BBC in the U.K. and a minor 500-title video channel to launch this month in Japan, the gaming giant has been fairly quiet on the subject of Over-the-Top video.

Given the content efforts of both Microsoft and Sony – not to mention Microsoft’s recent price cuts undertaken specifically to grow its console/gateway base for video distribution – can Nintendo afford to continue sitting on the sidelines? Or is that precisely what it should do, to remain focused on gaming when other console vendors are spinning their wheels on new video efforts?

Inferior Hardware a Barrier?

As discussed in TDG’s latest report, 'Console Vendors and Over-the-Top Delivery: Let the Games Begin!', Nintendo's Wii – though well diffused – is not at first glance well suited for video delivery to the TV. At 480p, the Wii's video resolution is far below that of the Xbox 360 and PS3, both of which provide HD-quality output.

Then again, today's DVDs are 480p and continue to provide an excellent video experience even on the largest of screens. In other words, for the vast majority of consumers, a DVD-quality experience appears to be acceptable, even enjoyable (a message lost on many Blu-ray vendors).

The lack of a local hard drive is definitely a problem for the Wii. Both the Xbox 360 and PS3 offer large hard drives capable of storing plenty of movies, even in HD.

However, as the folks from Move Networks and Netflix are proving each day, streaming video over the Internet can provide a TV-like experience without the need for a hard drive of any kind. Perhaps the consumer-premised equipment (CPE) in a streaming scenario doesn’t have to be as ‘smart’ or expensive as many think!

So if there isn’t necessarily a technical roadblock to using the console as a video gateway, why is delivering streaming video via the Wii not more commonplace?

Video: a Risky Business for Console Companies?

In the past, console makers have been reluctant to distribute non-gaming media via the game console due to fear of distracting from the big-money activity – that is, buying and using game software owned or licensed by the console manufacturer. Remember, the console cost is in large part subsidized by the manufacturer on the expectation that content sales will make up the difference. Providing video services via a game console could thus be seen as dilutive to gaming software revenue.

This position seems a bit short-sighted, based on a very shallow understanding of the how gaming consoles are actually being used today. Most console users also use the platform to access online media via the TV or to play DVDs and CDs.

No major vendor sees its console as only a gaming platform; it’s just a question of the degree to which they extend console-based experiences and applications beyond the gaming center. Even Nintendo’s Wii has a variety of non-gaming activities that may be seen as ‘dilutive’ to the core gaming experience, but these activities are still present (and growing in number).

For console vendors, the categorical imperative must be recast as follows: Always act so that the maxim of your action creates a media experience of such stickiness that users desire to stay within the ‘walls’ of the console environment for as long as possible.¹

In the world of quantum media – where consumers can access and enjoy virtually any kind of content at anytime, at any location, on any device, and on any network – fulfilling this imperative becomes increasing difficult. It becomes more difficult to keep your core audience engaged, meaning that vendors must think in terms of compelling non-gaming reasons for its users to stay in this virtual world for as long as possible.

For Nintendo, it seems acceptable to allow its core users to wander in for gaming and wander out for other media. For Microsoft and Sony, it may be virtual doors through which consumers exit but it is real money they take with them!

Microsoft’s Xbox LIVE effort provides an interesting case study in the value of this new imperative. With the recent addition of Netflix’s ‘Watch Instantly’ catalogue, Xbox LIVE users can now access more than 12,000 Netflix streaming-on-demand movies and TV programs.

Combine this with the more than 15,000 movies and TV shows available for download and there is little reason for Microsoft’s 14 million Xbox LIVE members to wander outside the console environment for non-gaming entertainment. Has this play worked?

According to recently released data, Microsoft seems to think so. According to its numbers, users have already spent over a billion dollars on Xbox LIVE since the network launched and downloaded nearly 700 million items from the Marketplace store. Blended entertainment experiences such as Guitar Hero III and Rock Band have generated more than 3.5 million music track downloads. And this is before users begin to engage the Netflix content!

Clearly Microsoft sees the power of this model, as does Sony (though to date its efforts have been more talk than substance). Using connected consoles as video distribution gateways seems a logical step in the evolution of the platform itself; a necessary progression that reflects the reality of digital convergence. The fact that Sony and Microsoft are both pushing (and being pushed by) this evolution makes sense; the fact that Nintendo is not seems a bit bewildering.

Wii OTT in Japan: A Beachhead or just Beached?

In December 2008, Nintendo plans to launch a Wii-based video-on-demand service called “Everyone’s Theater Wii,” offering Japanese users on-demand access to a variety of movies and TV shows.²

Users are asked to spend 500 Nintendo Points to download a third-party video player (Fujisoft’s Ulexit), after which they may choose to pay a per-viewing fee for programs they wish to watch. The service is expected to launch with about 500 titles including animes, movies, music programs, and documentaries, each of which will cost between 100 and 400 Wii points per download.³

Unlike Microsoft and Sony, however, Nintendo is NOT managing the service – Fujisoft has that responsibility. Nintendo is exchanging access to its Japanese Wii user base for royalties.

Will the Wii video service succeed in Japan? Time will tell, but given Nintendo’s royal regional status, not to mention the Japanese appetite for digital video, the chances for service success are favorable. Nonetheless, Nintendo has set very low expectations for the project and has yet to reveal any specific plans or timeline for bulking up the content roster.

That will prove key to the service’s long-term viability and ultimately reveal whether Nintendo is serious about building a Wii-based video distribution network.

As to the chances that the Wii video service will make it beyond the shores of Japan, early reports rank the probability at “near zero.”4 That being said, TDG believes such predictions are hasty bearing in mind the competitive pressures that Nintendo will face as global demand lightens and pressures from investors build.

In the End

In order for the Wii to remain competitive in the long-term, Nintendo must enable Wii-based OTT video services of some kind. TDG expects that within the next two years either:

(a) Nintendo will seek third-party partners in both the U.S. and Europe for Wii-based video delivery, or

(b) Nintendo will work with a company like Move Networks to roll out their own service and thus compete directly with Microsoft and Sony. Either way, Nintendo will be forced to get into the video game, likely sooner than even they may expect.

One thing is for certain: given the pace at which Wii consoles are finding their way into North America and Europe, Nintendo will be able to offer video content creators and distributors a very large family audience and enthusiastic base of would-be OTT viewers. That’s gotta be worth a small fortune!

[1] Apologies to Immanuel Kant.

[2] "Fujisoft Announces 'Everybody’s Theater Channel for Wii,' James Charlton, Nintendo World Report, October 31, 2008

[3] “CEATEC 2008: 'Fujisoft launches Japan-only VOD service for the Wii,' Serkan Toto, CrunchGear, October 2, 2008

[4] 'Everybody’s Theater brings downloadable TV to Japanese Wiis,' October 29, 2008, Wii News.

[The preceding report is written by Colin Dixon of The Diffusion Group, and reprinted with kind permission. TDG's full report on console vendors and 'OTT delivery' is available through the group's official site.]


Related Jobs

Io-Interactive
Io-Interactive — Copenhagen, Denmark
[04.24.14]

Gameplay Programmer
Io-Interactive
Io-Interactive — Copenhagen, Denmark
[04.24.14]

Generalist Tech Programmer
SG North
SG North — Toronto, Ontario, Canada
[04.23.14]

Director of Live Production
Turbine Inc.
Turbine Inc. — Needham, Massachusetts, United States
[04.23.14]

Director, Analytics Platform Development










Comments


Jake Romigh
profile image
I very much doubt that most of the American people targeted by the Wii would be interested in paying money to download streaming video. But who knows, right?

Patrick Merritt
profile image
The Wii has sold 39 million consoles and has 48% of the market. Why would Nintendo need to do anything? I think Nintendo has made it very clear they are trying to be very different than their competitors. Wii sales on one game alone, and thats Wii Sports. A game that got mediocre reviews. As it turns out the game is loads of fun and has tons of replay value, and is tremendously popular. I agree Nintendo isn't doing everything we think it should be doing, but they are tremendously succesful. I've been following Nintendo's business strategy for about 12 years. It doesn't ever make total sense, bt they still remain profitable. They don't take risks (aside from Wii itself, but considering how popular it was. Was it really a risk).



Microsoft obviously has lots of gold, but Sony has had financial problems throughout the year for overspending. Nintendo has had slow steady growth without losses(they only posted a loss 1 quarter in i think 2004 in the last 20 years.



DVD playback and other video media isn't terribly important to Nintendo's strategy. It is worth noting Wii is one of the better experiences for visiting Youtube. When my computer was broken, i used to use the Wii as my internet tool, and it worked decently.



However, again I'd like to reiterate Nintendo is doing perfectly well. Wii has outsold Gamecube sales by double in 1/3 the time. They can only sale more systems after this; especially when they eventually lower their price and release extra colors. Hopefully, though as a wii owner i'm disappointed in the volume of hardcore games. 3rd parties have been releasing nothing but casual shovelware. This is not what the consumer wants. A great casual game like wii sports can be extremely good, but only once in a while. Consumers want variety and they'll prove it with their pocketbook.

Taure Anthony
profile image
Patrick couldn't have put it better myself!!!

Bryan Diggs
profile image
Digital downloads will be a novelty in the future and won't replace physical disc. And most importantly...no hard drive.

Scott Galloway
profile image
I think its funny that they think Nintendo is still in the same class as the Xbox360 and the PS3. Nintendo has from the very beginning stated that they don't feel they are in direct competition with the other systems as it is in a class of its own. The Xbox 360 and PS3 are meant to function as multimedia gome entertainment hubs while the Wii is a pure physical interaction device for the family. Nintendo never designed their console to do the same thing the other systems do for a reason.



As far as the Video issues depicted in this article are concerned the only thing Nintendo Wii truly has lacking is Demo content in both playability and video form.



-my 2 cents

Axel Zero
profile image
I think Nintendo slowly put this service worldwide and gain market instead Microsoft/Sony, becose 480p is good even at HDTV, I have a upscaler DVD player and a Blu-ray player 1080p and I see a little bit difference from the upscaling DVD at 480p. I hope Nintendo with the largest user base compete very well aganist the counterparts.

Corbin Supak
profile image
I keep thinking that Apple might try to acquire Nintendo. Apple sort of failed with its set-top attempt, the AppleTV, and they've got to migrate the iTunes media portal concept to the set. The aesthetics of the two companies are similar, and I think investors would get very excited by the possibilities. And I think the Microsoft-Netflix thing is huge and could motivate Apple. If I could rent movies on my Wii from the iTunes store for 3 bucks, I would.

Geoffrey Mackey
profile image
Great points everyone. I don't think Nintendo would allow Apple to take them over. Like everyone else said they're happy being who they are.



I love rooting for the under-dog though. I remember early analysis said that they would only sell 9 million Wii's (In US) in five years.

Patrick Merritt
profile image
If Iwata learned anything from Yamauchi before giving the rains to the company he'd know to act like a crazy crackpot anytime a company tries to acquire them.



Yamauchi acted crazy when Atari in the early 80s tried to buy Nintendo. Ateri changed their minds. Yamauchi then pulled his son in law Minoru Arakawa aside and told him "thats how it gets done". Arakawa retired well before Iwata took over, but Iwata seems to be an evil genius. Nintendo was basically bought out years ago when Nintendo bought Hal and Hal subsequently took over the company. Some of us call it pulling a Kirby.



Apple has always been interested in Nintendo, and they are very similar companies. Steve Jobbs even said that the company he worries about the most is Nintendo, that was in the early 80s before Nintendo's antitrust trials. I think however the companies work better separately. Because they are seperate companies they will both go through different era of change, and as separate entities one could stand to learn from the other.



a couple of years ago Microsoft wanted to buy Nintendo. Nintendo said they seriously considered, but of course Nintendo said no. Nintendo however moved their headquarters recently and sold their company campuses to Microsoft who was right across the street. Microsoft got their land but not their market share/licenses.


none
 
Comment: