[In this opinion piece, writer Duncan Fyfe looks at the unique strengths of KOTOR II/Neverwinter Nights 2 developer Obsidian Entertainment, discussing why the RPG creator has "consistently had the most interesting and forward-thinking ideas about party members and dynamics."]
Last week, weblog Kotaku claimed that more than 20 people lost their jobs
when Obsidian Entertainment's Aliens
RPG was cancelled. Though not confirmed, no one should have to look for any other reasons why that report was bad news. Selfishly, perhaps, I thought of some anyway.
Very little was ever said about the Aliens
RPG, but I'm sure that I would have played it, regardless of whether it now gets completed. I've found that Obsidian Entertainment, compared to every other developer that makes party-based RPGs, has consistently had the most interesting and forward-thinking ideas about party members and dynamics, whether in games that I like (Knights of the Old Republic II
) or ones that I don't (Neverwinter Nights 2
If RPG parties don't seem like a design element fraught with weakness, consider games like Knights
or Mass Effect
wherein your character faces the greatest conceivable evil in the universe, but isn't allowed to take more than two people along to fight it.
No game fiction has ever made a convincing argument for why the world's biggest hero can't deal with having three guys around at once. Restrictions on party members are a tech limitation, presumably; in the isometric Baldur's Gate
days, the limit was five.
Still, there were always more characters available, so why not six? Why not seven? What can they possibly be doing that's more important than saving the world?
I think gamers largely recognize it as an issue of engine capacity or gameplay balance, but that doesn't make it any less of a logical flaw. Whenever the player character meets an exciting new person, he should never have to lamely respond "I'd love to have you on board, but I don't have room."
Party members haven't aged very well conceptually. Games used to present them solely as stat amplifiers and combat assists, but even as they developed voice acting and subplots and became love interests they still seem more often than not like accessories instead of personalities.
Just Waiting Around
If it wasn't so steeped in familiar RPG convention, it would surely seem bizarre that party members, upon their initial meeting with you, sign on to your cause and then hang out inactive at your headquarters forever after you decide they're no good in fights.
Why would anyone be so content to be relegated to the background and how can they afford to put their lives on hold? No hero's that charismatic. Maybe in the future all RPG protagonists should be eccentric billionaires who hire random pedestrians to carry their bags; it would explain a lot.
The closer RPGs approximate our own reality, the less plausible this comes off. It's passable in fantasy worlds where nobody has a job other than tavern owner or blacksmith, but when placed against the near-future military backdrop of BioWare's Mass Effect
, certain conventions become absurd.
The commander is required to buy munitions from his subordinates and, on a whim, appoints as his closest advisors and ground team foreign nationals and volunteers who never passed a security check and are happy not getting paid.
If you're in line for a promotion on the good ship Mass Effect
, twenty years of service doesn't cut it next to a mysterious alien with a past.
Addressing The Issue
With every game they've made in the last six years, BioWare have moved closer towards a cinematic style of storytelling, an more immediate combat model and away from traditional CRPG artifice. Except they're still encouraging players to accumulate characters as extra abilities and then leave them in the engine room, forgotten.
Obsidian writer/designer Chris Avellone addressed this point ten years ago when he worked at Black Isle Studios. In Planescape: Torment
, a disparate cast of characters, in the usual fashion, abandon their everyday routine to support a stern, violent and naked man with more tattoos than memory.
For once, this is remarked upon as odd. In a denouement equivalent to a detective gathering all the murder suspects in the parlour room, the Torment
party members' motivations and histories are all revealed to be deeper than originally apparent. Given their specific, tragic circumstances, they had no choice but to follow him when he asked.
Knights of the Old Republic II
echoed that scene. One of the game's principal features was its influence system. Players gained influence with their companions by performing actions that they endorsed, which unlocked additional dialogue options.
Avellone works this mechanic into the story, explaining that the main character is in fact so aberrantly charismatic that he exerts a metaphysical influence on people which compels them to do crazy things like join his party and fight on his behalf. He is therefore dangerous and must be stopped.
Neverwinter Nights 2
players don't have the same luck. In that game some party members will quit or switch sides based on the level of influence the player has with them.
Most will leave over ideological disagreements, but at least one person will side with the enemy at a critical moment if the player didn't put her in the party enough or give her any cool armour or weapons.
It might not be convincing that she'd want to kill her former friend based on that grievance, but it's a pretty accurate indictment of typical RPG player behaviour. I never selected that character precisely because I did
think she was useless, and games have conditioned me to think that she wouldn't have a problem with that.
In Knights II
, Obsidian had players take direct control of their supplicants for solo missions, and the full cast featured in their own cutscene-driven subplots.
Neverwinter Nights 2
treated its concluding battle with appropriate gravity by allowing the players control of their entire party. Obsidian granted those secondary characters greater presence with each successive game -- until removing them entirely in their upcoming spy RPG, Alpha Protocol.
has one controllable character and no permanent party members. Maybe it's a deliberate change of pace for Obsidian, or maybe it's the best solution of all. Alpha Protocol
will certainly be free from deadbeats and hangers-on who admonish you for acts of kindness but will still do whatever you say.
The best way to deal with those plausibility issues is not to invite them into the design in the first place. It'll work, but because it's the safe option. If it marks the beginning of a new approach for Obsidian, then I'll miss the subversion and the experimentation.
Developers can craft a character with a wealth of personal history, trust issues and the potential for an ice-thawing courtship, and they can have them try to kill me for not buying them shoes. I like the second option more.