Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
November 21, 2009
 
Video Game Watchdog National Institute On Media And The Family Shutting Down [10]
 
Modern Warfare 2 Infinity Ward's 'Most Successful PC Version' Yet [11]
 
New Tech, Design Details Of Project Natal To Emerge At Gamefest In February
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
November 21, 2009
 
arrow Upping The Craft: Susan O'Connor On Games Writing [6]
 
arrow Small Developers: Minimizing Risks in Large Productions - Part II [6]
 
arrow iPhone Piracy: The Inside Story [48]
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
November 21, 2009
 
Accepting the Inherent Value of Games
 
Planckogenesis, Part II: Song Structure & Gravy Train [1]
 
Designing Games Is About Matching Personalities [1]
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
November 21, 2009
 
Sucker Punch Productions
3D Environment Artist
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Network Programmer
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Character Artist
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Texture Artist
 
Crystal Dynamics
Sr. Level Designer
 
Sony Online Entertainment
Brand Manager
 
Monolith Productions
Sr. Software Engineer, Engine - Monolith Productions - #113767
 
Gargantuan Studios
Technical Art Director
spacer
About
spacer News Director:
Leigh Alexander
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Editor At Large:
Chris Remo
Advertising:
John 'Malik' Watson
Recruitment/Education:
Gina Gross
 
News

  Yee: 'We Will Prevail' In CA Game Bill
by Simon Carless
0 comments
Share RSS
 
 
March 28, 2006
 
Yee: 'We Will Prevail' In CA Game Bill
Advertisement
Speaking in an interview with website GamePolitics.com, California Assembly Speaker pro tem Leland Yee has commented on his controversial appearance at the Game Developers Conference in San Jose last week, as documented on Gamasutra, in which Yee debated prominent linguist and education-and-games proponent Dr. James Paul Gee (University of Wisconsin at Madison) and Jason Della Rocca of the IGDA.

Yee has previously opposed the ESA-led injunction against his California violent game bill, suggesting: "The $31 billion video game industry is not concerned with the health and welfare of our children; they are simply concerned with their own financial interests."

However, he commented to GamePolitics of his GDC appearance: "I don't see this as enemy territory. My ultra-violent video game bill was never against the gaming community or the gaming industry whatsoever. I see [the game industry] as partners in trying to make things better for our children. I felt I was treated fairly."

The California speaker also had commentary on what his future plans in the game legislation area might be, noting: "This [current California law] is all that I'm going to be doing with the gaming. I think the other concern that many people have was that this was a slippery slope. 'Are you going to go after other things,' and so on."

He concluded: "The honest truth right now - I don't see myself doing anything now or in the future on this gaming thing. It was only this one that dealt with the ultra-violent video games", but commented of the fight over the California game bill, still making its way through the courts: "We believe that we will prevail."
 
   
 
Comments

none
 
Comment:
 


Submit Comment