GAME JOBS
Contents
Bungie In 2008: Reflecting On Halo 3, Moving Beyond
 
 
Printer-Friendly VersionPrinter-Friendly Version
 
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
June 7, 2013
 
Social Point
Senior Game Developer
 
Treyarch / Activision
Senior Environment Artist
 
Sony Computer Entertainment America - Santa Monica
Senior Staff Programmer
 
Sony Computer Entertainment America - Santa Monica
Sr Game Designer
 
Trendy Entertainment
Gameplay Producer
 
Trendy Entertainment
Technical Producer
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
June 7, 2013
 
Tenets of Videodreams, Part 3: Musicality
 
Post Mortem: Minecraft Oakland
 
Free to Play: A Call for Games Lacking Challenge [2]
 
Cracking the Touchscreen Code [4]
 
10 Business Law and Tax Law Steps to Improve the Chance of Crowdfunding Success
spacer
About
spacer Editor-In-Chief:
Kris Graft
Blog Director:
Christian Nutt
Senior Contributing Editor:
Brandon Sheffield
News Editors:
Mike Rose, Kris Ligman
Editors-At-Large:
Leigh Alexander, Chris Morris
Advertising:
Jennifer Sulik
Recruitment:
Gina Gross
Education:
Gillian Crowley
 
Contact Gamasutra
 
Report a Problem
 
Submit News
 
Comment Guidelines
 
Blogging Guidelines
Sponsor
Features
  Bungie In 2008: Reflecting On Halo 3, Moving Beyond
by Christian Nutt [Design, Programming, Art, Interview, Console/PC]
2 comments Share on Twitter Share on Facebook RSS
 
 
June 2, 2008 Article Start Previous Page 8 of 11 Next
 

Chris Butcher

From an engineering perspective, what was your contribution to Halo 3?

Chris Butcher: Coming off of Halo 2, I was responsible for the networking and UI and the multiplayer side of the game -- that kind of online experience, from a technical standpoint. For Halo 3, I was responsible for doing early contributions to the online side of things.



And as a lead engineer, I was just helping out with various random things. The last thing I did was I made the Chinese font display correctly. (laughs) Stuff like that. You do a lot of general-type stuff.

I think that game was a nice leap forward, in terms of its online implementation, and will probably become influential. The Forge stuff opens things up a lot to the players, but in a very accessible way. Was that a challenge to get that working?

CB: It was one of the things that we placed the largest technological investments in, in Halo 3, besides obviously bringing the game to the Xbox 360, which was one of the large technological pillars for us. One of the others was online multiplayer.

We really wanted to take the experience and make it very relevant to the player, and immediate in that sense. One of the overall principles we had when we started, was that everything the player does in this game, they should be able to do with their friends.

Everything is cooperative. Everything from the single player -- you can play through cooperatively and score with it -- you can watch a saved film, you can invite your friends to watch the saved film with you. Even if they don't have it on their box, you can be narrating it and showing them all the cool stuff that's going on, or you can play Forge together and edit maps collaboratively.

We really wanted to make that social experience part of the underlying fabric of the game, because that's what multiplayer is about. It's about connecting with people -- your friends or strangers -- and it's a big part of Halo 3.

One of the things that can be difficult in development is, say, designers working with engineers to realize their ideas. How does that work at Bungie? How are you able to implement these highly technical ideas, from a content perspective?

CB: One of the guiding principles that we have is, "The game is the thing." It doesn't matter if something you're doing can be as technically smart or elegant in design as possible. If it's not in the overall service of the game, it doesn't really matter.

I think everybody at Bungie -- from engineers to designers to artists -- understands that it's a collaborative process, and you have to be able to work really well in small groups to enable other peoples' potential.

What that means on the engineering side is that if there's something that's very easy to do technically or very hard to do technically, if it's in the service of the overall design it's the right thing to do. And vice versa. You may have something that you think is technically awesome, but if it doesn't fit well with the design of the user interface and you don't easily communicate to players how it will fit, then it's not really worth doing.

 
Article Start Previous Page 8 of 11 Next
 
Top Stories

image
How Kinect's brute force strategy could make Xbox One a success
image
Microsoft's official stance on used games for Xbox One
image
Gearbox's Randy Pitchford on games and gun violence
image
Why you can't trade items in MMOs anymore
Comments

Rayna Anderson
profile image
great interview! it's really interesting hearing about the tech side of the development of Halo 3 as well as how they managed the huge process. I really got a lot of of Mike (and Vic's) presentations on the environment art in Halo at last month's IGDA Montreal meeting. It's always fascinating to see the paths these people have taken to create such a memorable product! I applaud Bungie for being so open with the industry and sharing so much so that we can learn from each other like this.

John McMahon
profile image
With Halo: Reach coming, I'd really like to see an article like this for that game. Also, what about doing postmortems for Halo 3, Reach, or any of the Halo games. I know ODST wasn't seen as a full game by the masses, but I'd love to know how testing and stretching the current tech they had to make ODST affected Halo: Reach. Or did ODST just bring firefight to Reach?



Again, great interview


none
 
Comment:
 




UBM Tech