Reactions: The iPad Itself
Reactions to the device itself vary. Some, like Chaim Gingold, Spore developer turned iPhone indie (Earth Dragon) are excited about the iPad's broad potential. Says Gingold, "What we are seeing, historically, is the long metamorphosis of computation from something that is used by nerds and specialists to shoot rockets to the moon and so on, to something that is designed around basic human needs and desires. Apple has always been one of the most innovative companies in applying computers to the lives of normal people."
And that, says Gingold, is tied into the device's form factor. "When you cuddle up with your friends to watch a movie on a couch or in bed on a laptop, something doesn't feel right -- it should be a different device we use to share photos, watch movies, share YouTube videos, and so on. The laptop is better than a desktop PC, but it's still not right. This feels more like it."
When it comes to form factor, Stein says, "if there's any company that can break ground here, it's Apple, and the focus on media and entertainment definitely gives this a shot at success." Young feels the device is a "netbook killer -- in that world it's unmatched in terms of its gaming capability."
Vihola sees the form factor allowing developers more freedom compared to the iPhone/iPod Touch. "On the iPod, you needed to design for simplicity to keep the visual elements both readable and accessible. The iPad makes it possible to put a lot more detail in and together with better handling of large, sweeping gestures, makes genres such as real-time strategy really come to life."
Seyler agrees. "The hardware looks plenty capable of running quality games, and the 10 inch multitouch screen should give developers a chance to get very creative with input design."
Most of the developers seem to see the possibility for expanded in-person multiplayer -- something the iPhone definitely does not excel at. Says Capy's Piotrowski, "Single screen multiplayer is probably the most exciting thing that immediately comes to mind for iPad-specific experiences."
Says Vihola, meanwhile, "It is going to be great for some of the more casual concepts as the bigger screen makes locally shared experiences more accessible -- imagine gathering around the iPad for board or trivia games," while Pusenjak says it "may be perfect for family games where multiple people can interact with it at the same time." Gingold agrees, "That should be fun to design for, and hopefully lead to some fun software."
The Same, But Different
The increased screen real estate -- nearly 10 full inches of multitouch -- is exciting for developers, but the size of the device is like to present changes to the way people think about development, despite the nearly identical interface options to its smaller siblings. Says Rein, "I suspect we'll see iPad-only games that take advantage of the differentiated form factor of the device and the different ways you might use it compared to the iPhone or iPod Touch."
"Holding up the iPad for virtual joysticks isn't going to be as comfortable out of the box as with the much lighter iPod," says Vihola. At the same time, Igor Pusenjak, of Lima Sky, wonders if the form factor might affect existing accelerometer-based game designs. "How does it feel to play an accelerometer-controlled game, such as Doodle Jump, on a device of that size?"
And the upsizing of the device might make it tough to connect with an audience, he suggests. "One thing that makes the iPhone and iPod touch a perfect casual gaming platform is that you always have it with you in your pocket."
PopCap's Stein, without being specific, says that the company is "always interested in how we can adapt our games to offer the best user experience. This means thinking deeply about the game itself and how we can best present that in a way that remains true to the core essence of the play but takes best advantage of the features of the platform and makes the most fun and entertaining game possible."
Young is even more positive -- he is "really excited about the potential for doing away with simulated d-pads." Gingold also loves the multitouch angle, saying, "It will be nice to play with a multitouch interface where you wish you had transparent fingers a little less. The iPhone screen is so small, as soon as you touch it, you lose a lot of visual contact. I can't wait to play with all the new software Apple has made, and see what kind of UI designs they've invented. That's one of the most interesting things for me."
|
like the wii opened the console market for a lot of people who didn't want to mess with "complicated" controls the ipad makes the digital world accessible for people who have trouble with things like attaching pictures to emails (they are around - a LOT of them!!!)
the question is if this will be as revolutionary as apple intends - how will it change budgets and goals for the gaming industry? will the industry focus on casual apps in the future because complex games are not selling as big as they used to or are getting too expensive? and of course the same as in iphone apps: is there any kind of money to be made for a team larger than 3-5 people?
As an avid ebook fan, I can't stress this point enough. But even if you forget the ebooks, it will very likely become THE device for reading PDF's and all those annoying PowerPoint-sheets.
It's going to be a "meeting"-device.
For that its perfect. (do you remember the marketing campaign for tablet pc's from Microsoft back in 200*?) This might be the product, I was hoping for, when I bought my X41 Tablet. (which is nice, but a fu@%ing pain to navigate)
Based upon this hypothesis, two conclusions can be drawn:
First, no, its not going to be big for gaming
Second, if it's going to be the next mainstream ebook reader, you can set prices like 9.99$ an App. Why? Because ebook Buyers are used to such prices for creative content. And if you target adult readers with ebook/game-hybrid programs like Point&Click Adventures... this might be a way to go.
- I think the iPad will be very successful, though not as incredibly so as the iPhone/iPod. Regardless of if one loves/hates Apple (or maybe you have a love/hate relationship with them), anyone who counts them out so soon best revisit the history of consumer electronics over the past decade.
- I suspect the iPad demographics will be different than iPhone (at least after the early adopters/Apple fanboys get their fill). I feel the age range will be even wider (young to old) and gender appeal more balanced than traditional consumer electronics (which weigh much more to men). I have no idea how wide or narrow the socioeconomic appeal.
- I suspect the iPad users will expect apps with more content than iPhone (but less still than console), which means larger budgets and (hopefully) less total crapware.
- I agree with one of the quotes that fine accelerometer control will be greatly de-emphasized as an input model for most apps since it will be pretty awkward and tiresome to hold that large unit and do anything repetitive more than a periodic shake of the device; the Need for Speed demo looked cool as a steering wheel input but I suspect after 5-10 minutes of holding/rotating the device the players hands will be ready to fall off.
- In the gaming arena higher content/budget expectations will also mean a shift away from the massive weighting of the casual genre (some will still be there, but not the majority as now). I also suspect pricing will be higher and would not be surprised to see top apps go for $20+.
- Also in gaming I expect we'll see even more games in more genres, especially those with massive content (open-world, MMORPG, etc.)
One thing I am 100% sure of: The adoption and evolution of the iPad will be interesting!
the whole thing just seems like a giant marketing nightmare. who or what is this thing for?
There are definitely a certain number of people around the world who will buy the iPad. Apple knows this already. But if they're relying on taking over the netbook market, they're not going to do that. Maybe people who bother to get really into feature comparisons between netbooks and iPads like you and I could see the benefits, but the casual user (i.e. nearly the entire netbook market) does not want to look at what they think is a computer and see an interaction interface that is totally foreign to them in that context. The first thing the casual user is going to say when they see an iPad being offered to them in lieu of an EeePC? "Where's the keyboard?" Even if they're familiar with the iPhone's screen keyboard, they're not going to think of that as a great alternative to a real, physical keyboard. I mean essentially Apple is targeting the same non-existent market that was targeted during the UMPC craze of a few years ago. That era proved that even early adopters don't want feature-crippled laptops mixed with the clunkiness of a giant cell phone. And in high tech, if you don't get the early adopters, you fail. Of course it will move a few hundred thousand units. It's Apple. They could put a USB port on a ham sandwich, call it the "iHam", sell it for $300, and every kid on the L train would have one. But it won't be revolutionary.
However, if you already have a game running on iPhones, it seems like getting it working on an iPad will take minimal effort in a lot of cases. In that case, why not expand your market that little big further if it's easy to do?
Here are my thoughts on why it won't live up to being more than just an oversized iPhone for gaming:
1) Anyone who has worked with OSX will attest to the attrocious "hackity" half-done implementation of OpenGL is for the OS and as such I have a great concern over how bastardized the OpenGL ES drivers are for the iPad and whether or not they will be able to deliver what is needed without causing signifcant pain and frustration for developers.
2) I honestly do not see the hardware specs running the device being that much greater. Yes its better than a 3GS device, but that isn't saying a lot.
3) Keeping games under the 10mb limit (especially with the Apple compression bloat) will be difficult if you want to best support both the iPhone and iPad screen resolutions nicely. I dont care what Apple claims, you cannot blow up pixels without some sort of unwanted distortion. So with that said, we will see more and more 100+mb games that really arent that impressive in nature and sadly these are the good AAA ones.
4) Bigger does not mean better. The device looks awkward to hold and even with the extra screen size I still do not believe that the virtual control overlay will succeed. Worse yet the device is not very mobile and for the most part almost every Game on the appstore is designed around the "5 minutes of casual" play logic (especially considering how lackluster the devices are for doing anything more than this).
5) AppStore prices. I find it odd that ebooks will go on this device for near retail prices, yet games for the AppStore will continue to get the royal hose job and still come in a $1 or $2 for the cheap-ass Appstore crowd. As such even if the device has the hardware and non-Apple screwiness to make it into a decent gaming platform will we ever really see games that utilize it best and present anything more than what we have already? I think not.
So with that said do I think the device will be a flop? More than likely? I think right now its best usage is as a coffee table device for casual web surfing at home. Its too big to be mobile and too lacking to be a real computer that people will use for traditional real-world usage (aka games and business).
Lastly, is it just me or does anyone else find it odd that neither Epic nor Unity recieved an iPad to work with yet EA and Gameloft did? You're talking about two major engine developers that had to sit on the outside like the rest of us. Thats absolutely rediculous. Apple should have hired these guys as consultants to find out what they need and want in the device (like MS and Sony do), not the other way around. This just reeks of more "Apple doesnt give a shit about game developers" problems that have plauged Apple for the past 20 years.
I think this is serious competition for the netbooks (and therefore for Chrome OS, anybody thought of that yet?).
Btw I find it funny that Mr. Jobs boasts of 1Ghz CPU in his iPad when Google came up with a 1Ghz Android phone BEFORE the iPad is even launched. :D
Games will sell once it establishes itself as a legitimate home computer. A webcam, (maybe) a more comfortable method to type outside of the dock, a digital ink type screen (imo, that's why e-readers are so appealing), and an easier way to base media out of it (as opposed to bringing it in from a home cpu).
After those issues are solved I'd say gaming has a chance.