GAME JOBS
Contents
A Big Change For Soulcalibur V: The Tago Interview
 
 
Printer-Friendly VersionPrinter-Friendly Version
 
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
June 7, 2013
 
Sledgehammer Games / Activision
Level Designer (Temporary)
 
High Moon / Activision
Senior Environment Artist
 
LeapFrog
Associate Producer
 
EA - Austin
Producer
 
Zindagi Games
Senior/Lead Online Multiplayer
 
Off Base Productions
Senior Front End Software Engineer
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
June 7, 2013
 
Tenets of Videodreams, Part 3: Musicality
 
Post Mortem: Minecraft Oakland
 
Free to Play: A Call for Games Lacking Challenge [1]
 
Cracking the Touchscreen Code [3]
 
10 Business Law and Tax Law Steps to Improve the Chance of Crowdfunding Success
spacer
About
spacer Editor-In-Chief:
Kris Graft
Blog Director:
Christian Nutt
Senior Contributing Editor:
Brandon Sheffield
News Editors:
Mike Rose, Kris Ligman
Editors-At-Large:
Leigh Alexander, Chris Morris
Advertising:
Jennifer Sulik
Recruitment:
Gina Gross
Education:
Gillian Crowley
 
Contact Gamasutra
 
Report a Problem
 
Submit News
 
Comment Guidelines
 
Blogging Guidelines
Sponsor
Features
  A Big Change For Soulcalibur V: The Tago Interview
by Christian Nutt, Brandon Sheffield [Business/Marketing, Design, Interview]
7 comments Share on Twitter Share on Facebook RSS
 
 
October 10, 2011 Article Start Previous Page 3 of 3
 

That made me think: when you can give different weapons to a character via customization, thus changing their fighting style -- how do you deal with that situation?

HT: We tend to create motions for male characters and motions for females separately. For example, Xianhua's moves are very lady-like; she relies on speed and quick motions in her combat, but she can also switch to "male" motions if that's the weapon she's given. So that's how we handle that.



Do you ever do any subtle variation? I think it's funny that the character takes on the motion of the weapon, but it also seems like it'd be interesting to keep the character's motion in the animation.

HT: We have done that a bit, in the past. Starting with IV, I think, characters can change weapons but not fighting styles.

So it depends on which game in the series. I'm curious about the ring-out system. How do fans react to that? Not a lot of games do it, and it's an interesting sumo-style system.

HT: Well, I think most fans think it sucks if they lose that way and it's awesome if they win that way. (laughs)

Do you have a set limit for how wide or narrow the stages should be, in terms of the time required to score a ring-out?

HT: There is a general standard for that -- I don't remember the exact measurements so I may have it wrong, but generally you have to knock your opponent back around 16 meters for it to happen.

Now that Tim Langdell has been defeated in court, will we see a return of SoulEdge?

HT: There's always that possibility, because plainly that's a title that we have a liking for. If you compare the logos for SoulEdge and Soulcalibur V, it's pretty plain how much they resemble each other, after all. (laughs)

It's interesting that you are working with an outside studio to work on the story mode. Can you talk about how and why you made that decision?

HT: Basically, we have made four different Soulcaliburs up until now, and we basically wanted to make a huge leap forward this time. We want to create something different. That's why we worked with outside companies.

I [Christian] felt like the Star Wars guest characters in the last game were on the gimmicky side.

HT: (chuckles)

Does that concern you -- that guest characters are getting to the point where they're sort of eclipsing the series a little bit?

HT: Yeah, that's so. With the inclusion of Star Wars characters, we were honored to work with LucasArts, and we were able to get a lot of Star Wars fans playing Soulcalibur. That was one thing.

With regard to Soulcalibur V, we really want to be careful with the world setting, so the guest characters won't ruin the Soulcalibur setting. So please be assured that, this time around, we have a really good guest character. We can't tell you anything yet at the moment, so please wait for the event this month.

Can you talk about how you selected CyberConnect2? Obviously, particularly Bandai has a really long history working with that developer.

HT: As you know, CyberConnect 2 has made the Naruto series, and the animations in the game and movies -- the quality is really high. We thought we wanted some of that element in Soulcalibur as well.

CyberConnect2 does hand animation, and you've used motion capture. Are you worried about inconsistency?

HT: We were kind of worried, but we really want to make something new and different. So far, it's been pretty good.

It's very common in the West for multiple different developers to work on the same title and to work on different modes. Could you talk about how you came to the decision that this was something you could do?

HT: As you know, we're specialists at making fighting games, but in terms of story mode, and the world setting, and the drama which gets involved in the game, we were kind of weak on. That's why we needed outside help to really push that area. We thought this wasn't something we could do by ourselves.

From a process standpoint, in terms of working with an outside developer and collaborating at the same time, has it been a challenge making everything fit -- the pieces fit, the schedule fit; that kind of thing?

HT: We have different philosophies with outside companies, and the way we work is totally different. So it was kind of hard to come to terms with different companies and adjust things.

Also, CyberConnect2 is in Fukuoka, so is it challenging from that perspective of having them distant from the main development team?

HT: Actually, CyberConnect made a studio here in Tokyo that very close, so that distance issue was not much of a problem. Also, Bandai has always worked closely with them, so the communication side was also very good. The Tokyo studio is more like a communication point, and the actual creation of the game is done in Fukuoka. It's not really the first time they're doing anything.

You took the step of changing the time-line of the game. Tekken did that in the past, so it's not entirely new, but I was wondering if that says something about the issue of... not rebooting, but making a new start for the series?

HT: We really wanted to emphasize a change. The setting jump for us was like a keyword; we really wanted to emphasize a different Soulcalibur.

You had said that you want to take the game to the next level, and that's part of the reason why you have the new story mode. To you, what represents the next level; what does that mean?

HT: It's basically changing everything: changing the story, changing the gameplay, changing the characters... The key word we have is "change."

SoulEdge image taken from http://caesar.logiqx.com/

 
Article Start Previous Page 3 of 3
 
Top Stories

image
Gearbox's Randy Pitchford on games and gun violence
image
Microsoft's official stance on used games for Xbox One
image
Keeping the simulation dream alive
image
A 15-year-old critique of the game industry that's still relevant today
Comments

Luis Guimaraes
profile image
"Why do you think there aren't any true 3D fighting games like that? You're always fighting on a 2D plane, after all. Why do you think a full-3D arena fighter hasn't worked yet?"



Should play Naruto Ultimate Ninja Storm 2.

David Sirlin
profile image
Soul Calibur is almost super amazingly great, but gets ruined every time. I am sad about that and really hope it's not true for Soul Calibur 5.



SC1: Actually is great. Best version by default, see below.



SC2: Sigh. Ring out made useless. Stages enormous and moves that used to ring out leave the enemy spinning in midair against an invisible wall for no apparent reason. Also, the unblockable window after parry shortened which actually reduces mind games (it used to last about "two moments long" so you could follow up early or late, and they didn't know which.) 4 parry options reduced to 2 for no reason I know of. Major game-breaking bug makes all post-parry options pointless anyway.



SC3: Ring out thing addressed, back to 4 parries, game-breaking bug fixed. Are we back to a great game now?? Some other bug now also makes the post-parry game pointless again. And another bug, one of the most severe in a fighting game, allows you to cancel the recovery of moves into other moves (yes, really). Also, this a sharp increase in visual confusion in this game's art direction. Moving away from the clean iconic style into more clutter.



SC4: Ok those bugs fixed, great. And now with Havok physics! Uh oh. The new physics causes very weird stuff with ground slides, allowing characters to be apparently grounded (sliding along the ground at least) but in a state where they are actually classified as airborne, and can be juggled as if they are in the air, as opposed to the ground. Nerdy complaint that no one cares about? Or thing that dominates the entire game to the point of needing a ban? lol. See: Hilde. In SC2, the great positional elements of the game were lost because you could hardly ever ring out. Now, you can be practically anywhere in the ring and Hilde can use havok physics fuck ups to ring you out, so again, positioning doesn't matter a lot. Add to this an even worse visual design. Nightmare: iconic knight? Or Nightmare: overly detailed mess, who wears a dozen orange carrots for some reason. Lizardman: simple lizard guy? Or lizardman: jumble of scales that I can hardly even keep track of as he moves around.



Soul Calibur is soooooo close to being great. They need to go back to simpler art direction, fix these game breaking bugs, and not add junk like armor breaks that just clutter up the UI. (Looks like this is thankfully absent from SC5.) I want this game to be great, I really do. But it keeps falling short of SC1, unfortunately. And in each case, it's like 95% (or more, maybe 99%?) of the overall work put into the game is fantastic, and something sneaks in to ruin it. Anyway, I'm rooting for you guys, I'm a big fan of the series despite all this.

A W
profile image
SC2 worked really well on GCN. I still have that game. Never witnessed any wall spinning.

Nathan Sanchez
profile image
@Johnny Fox: Only scrubs thought ring-outs were cheese. It takes a hell of a lot of set-up to ring out a good player.

A W
profile image
Yes... Make Ivy more "Adult"...


none
 
Comment:
 




UBM Tech