GAME JOBS
Contents
Kim Swift On Creating Quantum Conundrum
 
 
Printer-Friendly VersionPrinter-Friendly Version
 
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
June 7, 2013
 
Sledgehammer Games / Activision
Level Designer (Temporary)
 
High Moon / Activision
Senior Environment Artist
 
LeapFrog
Associate Producer
 
EA - Austin
Producer
 
Zindagi Games
Senior/Lead Online Multiplayer
 
Off Base Productions
Senior Front End Software Engineer
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
June 7, 2013
 
Tenets of Videodreams, Part 3: Musicality
 
Post Mortem: Minecraft Oakland
 
Free to Play: A Call for Games Lacking Challenge [1]
 
Cracking the Touchscreen Code [3]
 
10 Business Law and Tax Law Steps to Improve the Chance of Crowdfunding Success
spacer
About
spacer Editor-In-Chief:
Kris Graft
Blog Director:
Christian Nutt
Senior Contributing Editor:
Brandon Sheffield
News Editors:
Mike Rose, Kris Ligman
Editors-At-Large:
Leigh Alexander, Chris Morris
Advertising:
Jennifer Sulik
Recruitment:
Gina Gross
Education:
Gillian Crowley
 
Contact Gamasutra
 
Report a Problem
 
Submit News
 
Comment Guidelines
 
Blogging Guidelines
Sponsor
Features
  Kim Swift On Creating Quantum Conundrum
by Frank Cifaldi, Brandon Sheffield [Design, Interview]
10 comments Share on Twitter Share on Facebook RSS
 
 
October 12, 2011 Article Start Previous Page 2 of 4 Next
 

Does that democratic approach carry over from Valve? Were you able to work that same way?

KS: On Portal definitely, and to some extent on Left 4 Dead 1 and 2. A little less on 2, because we had such a short timeframe to make the game -- it was like a year start-to-finish, which was amazing to me that we actually did that [laughs].



Yeah, I was surprised when it was announced. It was like, "Already?"

KS: [laughs] We were surprised too. It was like, "Oh my god! We did it, we're not running on Valve Time! Holy crap!"

Kind of compare the two studios for us if you could, as far as the development practices between them. What's the same? What's different?

KS: I guess to me, as far as working on this game, it felt more like working on Portal just because we have a really small team and we're all pretty young, and we're kind of goofy. We give each other a lot of crap and joke around every day. And so I really like that a lot.

Valve has gotten a lot bigger since I've left. I know when I was there, when I first started, the company at least doubled in size while I was there. It might have even tripled. So I definitely like smaller companies where I get to know everybody, and know who their kids are, and know who their dogs are, and they bring them into work! And just having a fun, almost family-like atmosphere.

How big is the team right now?

KS: We're 16 people!

That's pretty small.

KS: Yes it is! [laughs]

Is everyone on this game?

KS: No. So the company as a whole is like 40 people, I think? Maybe 50? So there are two projects at the studio. There's ours, that has 16 people, and there's another that has the rest.

So you're the small team.

KS: Yeah. We're the tiny team.

It seems like this genre is going to get a lot more crowded soon. In general the physics platformer has started to take off, especially with the indies. Do you think it could become a proper, popular genre?

KS: I think so! It's the type of game I want to play anyway, so I don't see why not. The more people that actually buy the product, you know, supply and demand, as publishers start to realize these are viable types of games they'll start putting money into them.

How much of these mechanics came out of the prototyping process?

KS: We got a prototype up and running within a couple of weeks with...I think we had fluffy prototyped right away. That was easy to do. And slow-motion was prototyped right away as well. So we just started playing around with a bunch of different ideas.

Once we prototyped a couple dimensions, we were like, "These are really fun!" Then we went to the whiteboard and started brainstorming as many different dimension ideas as we possibly could, figuring out how long it would take to prototype them, and which ones we thought would interact the best with the couple of dimensions we had already.

During the demo, one of the mechanics you showed us -- kind of creating a sine wave by turning gravity on and off and feathering an object across the room -- you said was an accidental discovery during prototyping?

KS: Yeah, totally. Once we had a couple of different dimensions prototyped, it was just like, "Well, let's play with it," in almost a white box room with a bunch of random crap in it. We had a zoo level that just had a box and like, a weird ball-looking thing, and just a bunch of other random shapes in it. And we were just kind of playing around and seeing what was fun and capitalizing on that in terms of figuring out what our gameplay mechanics were going to be in each dimension.

It sounds like most of the development so far has just been finding fun and figuring out what to do with it after?

KS: Yeah. Pretty much.

So you didn't start off so much with a high level concept?

KS: The high level concept was "We're going to make a game about changing dimensions, and each dimension is a tool for you to use in order to manipulate your environment." Then it was a matter of coming up with a bunch of different dimensions and then figuring out which ones we felt had the most permutations of use, and then interacted the best with other dimensions. Because we wanted to, at the end of the game, have all five dimensions present in one space at the same time, and how those would actually interact with each other and get the most switching back and forth between them.

How are you going to deal with it narratively?

KS: Right now it's very dry, because there is no voiceover. But eventually we will have a voiceover for Professor Quadwrangle. He's able to tap into the intercom system and communicate with you through there.

 
Article Start Previous Page 2 of 4 Next
 
Top Stories

image
Gearbox's Randy Pitchford on games and gun violence
image
Microsoft's official stance on used games for Xbox One
image
Keeping the simulation dream alive
image
A 15-year-old critique of the game industry that's still relevant today
Comments

Hamish Todd
profile image
There are two other good FPS puzzle platformers.



Somnia - http://crypticsea.blogspot.com/2009/06/somnia-play-it.html which is seriously the best prototype I've ever played.



And Antichamber/Hazard: The Journey of life - again available only in prototype, but an excellent excellent game which unlike Somnia is being fleshed out http://hazard-the-journey-of-life.en.softonic.com/



I'm not trying to look clever - as prototypes, I know they're minor cases. They seriously need a shout though.

Hamish Todd
profile image
Huh, I'm thinking of more now, like QUBE, Devil's Tuning Fork, Paradox Shift, Unfinished Swan and Tag: the power of paint... those first two are the best though.



Again these are only prototypes. This tells us one thing: Portal has been pretty damn influential.

warren blyth
profile image
I was going to mention that "the Ball" was a puzzle FPS. maybe not a great game (? I didn't complete it, and sometimes felt a little bored), but I'd say it counts. no?



or am I missing something?



(I'm tempted to suggest Amnesia was a puzzle FPS... but I guess it's better described as a horror survival FPS.? Is the key that a "FPS platforming puzzler" has to eschew violence? or does it have to entirely focus it's story/setting on a puzzle solving conceit? Amnesia has parts about jumping from one thing to another. other parts about stacking physics objects to reach things.)



-thanks for all these links/names by the way. Tag was the only one i'd heard of before.

Hamish Todd
profile image
@Rog We're not talking about portalling games, we're talking about puzzle platforming FPSs.



@warren Don't mention it, here's some more that popped into my head!



In order of recommended-ness:



Antimatière http://www.indiegames.com/2011/02/browser_game_pick_antimatire_e.html I shouldn't have forgotten this one.



http://s3.amazonaws.com/ld48/index.html

http://ian.janasnyder.com/feign_2.html

http://bartbonte.com/14locks/



And even more trailers to come:

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2011/07/01/brain-bending-torsion/

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2011/01/07/stress-the-abstract-fract- beta/



=/ someone should do an article on these things. Or commission me to do one!



Devil's Tuning Fork, by the way, isn't much worth playing past the first three puzzles. That'll sound odd, but seriously, the last levels are barely-disguised and roundabout retreads of the first ones.



Somnia, Antichamber, and Antimatière - those are the most important.

Christopher Supino
profile image
Why hasn't Mirrors Edge been mentioned?

Joel Bitar
profile image
Why should mirrors edge be mentioned here?



I think ME was a great game, but you could literally run straight through it without ever stopping to think about anything, just follow the colours.



I think this was a great way to play the game as it added to the feeling of stress and being on the run, but fps-wise it's more of an opposite to portal than even the CODs.

Lance Burkett
profile image
@Joel



But when you turn the colours off, then it turns into a really good puzzle game.

Joe Wreschnig
profile image
If you just follow the colors you'll beat the level, but usually in slow and uncreative ways.

Joshua King
profile image
Is there shooting in any of these games? It bothers me that folk so often use "FPS" to describe a game that is simply just using a First-Person view which is _very_ different to what you expect to get from an FPS game. Do I need to get a life?

Lance Burkett
profile image
The meaning of words change, but the connotations usually remain the same. DEAL WITH IT! :D


none
 
Comment:
 




UBM Tech