GAME JOBS
Contents
Building A Fantasy World - The Art Direction Of Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning
 
 
Printer-Friendly VersionPrinter-Friendly Version
 
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
June 7, 2013
 
Sony Computer Entertainment America - Santa Monica
Sr Game Designer
 
Trendy Entertainment
Gameplay Producer
 
Sony Computer Entertainment America - Santa Monica
Senior Staff Programmer
 
Trendy Entertainment
Technical Producer
 
Telltale Games
Lead Environment Artist
 
Sledgehammer Games / Activision
Level Designer (Temporary)
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
June 7, 2013
 
Tenets of Videodreams, Part 3: Musicality
 
Post Mortem: Minecraft Oakland
 
Free to Play: A Call for Games Lacking Challenge [1]
 
Cracking the Touchscreen Code [4]
 
10 Business Law and Tax Law Steps to Improve the Chance of Crowdfunding Success
spacer
About
spacer Editor-In-Chief:
Kris Graft
Blog Director:
Christian Nutt
Senior Contributing Editor:
Brandon Sheffield
News Editors:
Mike Rose, Kris Ligman
Editors-At-Large:
Leigh Alexander, Chris Morris
Advertising:
Jennifer Sulik
Recruitment:
Gina Gross
Education:
Gillian Crowley
 
Contact Gamasutra
 
Report a Problem
 
Submit News
 
Comment Guidelines
 
Blogging Guidelines
Sponsor
Features
  Building A Fantasy World - The Art Direction Of Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning
by Christian Nutt [Design, Art, Interview]
12 comments Share on Twitter Share on Facebook RSS
 
 
November 28, 2011 Article Start Previous Page 3 of 4 Next
 

When creating the individual look, that must be when you generated so much concept art.

TC: Yes, yes. We've got some fantastic concept artists we've been working with on the project. Sean Andrew Murray is our principal concept artist -- he's a fantastic concept artist. And a number of other folks that we've worked with over the duration of the project.



What we do is we sit down and start talking about things. Like we're going to do a creature, for example. We'll sit down and start brainstorming about what it could be. But we actually brainstorm with the designers and the engineers.

We get everybody in a room and we do like, "Wouldn't it be cool if we did this, this, and this?" And we gather all those ideas up, and we get the best of the best of them. Like the leads kind of round up and say, "Well, these are really good things we want to do."

And then we start diving in on the concept art. And some of the concept stuff is awesome. You know, we get lots of thumbnail sketches, and then we refine it down to the final piece.

But then, in addition to that, I sit down with the lead character modeler, Alan Denham, and the lead animator, Young Vo. The three of us will be like "Okay, now we're really going to have to make this thing, so let's really dive deep on this. Are there any technical constraints we need to be worrying about? Any specific things that are like "Yeah, that's not going to work with these other bits and pieces that we have?"

And the cool part about is like every person in the chain tries to find a way to plus it. So, even at the concept stage, everyone's saying, "Oh, we can make it 5 percent better if we did this, this, and this!" It goes to the modelers, they try to find that like "Oh, you know what? I'm going to do something that's going to blow your mind! Everyone tries to find that angle.

And when the animators get it, it's like they're looking at it to try to say, "Okay, we want to make this combat as cool as we can possibly make it." So, they work with combat designers, and the animators are all in one pit together. They sit around and they brainstorm this stuff, and then we kind of refine it.

But even at that point, it's almost like an actor coming to a role. By putting different people on it, you get different results. So, the fun part about it, is it's like the creatures, we actually designed them in such a way that they have different personalities to them. And as you get deeper and deeper into the game, the nature of who they are, the types of creatures you're fighting, and the areas that you're fighting them in, you can see there's an evolution that takes place over the duration. It's pretty cool.

It sounds like you're very cross-discipline at a very early stage, at the studio.

TC: Yeah. I think it's really important, especially from an art standpoint. You really don't want to over-emphasize any one slice of the overall project. Every part of it is important.

One of the things I keep saying is, for this project, every part of it was considered. There's lore. There's back story. We basically developed this game in our own engine, so we're trying to build to the strengths of what we think is going to be the best possible game.

And at each point, everybody checks each other. The team is very, very collaborative. So everybody is always looking at it saying, "Uh... Really?" We have a running joke where people come in and go, "Really? Is that final?" It's like, "Ugh. Okay, yeah, alright. I've got to put in another weekend on this, because I think it can be that much better."

You're talking about moving things from concept to modelers, to animators, and stuff. You're passing things along. I'm curious about how that works.

TC: It's pretty cool. One of the things we do is we don't... It's not like a hard line where the concept guys are done, and then there's nothing more the concept guys do. We round up with everybody on a regular basis and say, "Look. Let's look at this stuff together as a group." And I'll point out the high level styling cues of things that are like, "No. I think we're missing it. I think we need to come back a little more here. The timing and animation may be a little bit off. Maybe what we need to do is kind of push that or make that a little bit sharper."

In addition to that, we're also working with the visionaries that are connected to the platform. Todd McFarlane, for example, is connected. Todd has a personal passion for animation, and so he'll come in and be like, "Oh my God. You could make this, like this... You have to go way over the top. You're halfway there." So, he's one of those people who pushes for that really high-level quality. By the time it's even being showed to Todd, the team has gone through vetting it multiple times, so it's really constantly refined and tuned.

Do you work with outsourcers? Because it sounds like your art process is very tightly controlled within the studio.

TC: We do work with outsourcers. For the project that we're working on, this is an open-world RPG, it's huge. There's this massive, massive game. So, just to populate this with all the individual bits and pieces that you need to fill, the size of the studio would need to be just absolutely huge. So, in some cases, outsourcing makes a lot of sense for a group like us. But what we do is we try to pull the most critical stuff in-house, things that are going to be mission-critical to the title. Those things, we really want to make sure it's as good as it can possibly be.

These days, I hear a lot of outsources doing props, not as much critical game stuff.

TC: I don't know if I'd say it's a hard philosophy. It's case-by-case. Certainly for this, there's so much stuff in the game... It's not like we have a checklist like "Okay, all these must go to outsourcers." Whenever there's an opportunity to give people the work in-house, we'll do that first.

But certainly from our standpoint, we don't want to shortchange anybody playing the game. We don't want to be like "Oh, we're just going to do what we can do." If we can extend the quality of the title by bringing some more folks in to help us get the thing done, we'll obviously do it.

In some cases, we're working with some fantastic freelance concept guys that are dynamite -- really, really talented folks. So again, I would give them all the props in the world. There are things like "This guy is awesome at this, so I will absolutely give those types of pieces to those people."

 
Article Start Previous Page 3 of 4 Next
 
Top Stories

image
Microsoft's official stance on used games for Xbox One
image
How Kinect's brute force strategy could make Xbox One a success
image
Keeping the simulation dream alive
image
Gearbox's Randy Pitchford on games and gun violence
Comments

Harry Fields
profile image
I'm actually looking forward to this one. Dunno why, but I think Curt has good taste in games and a solid understanding of addictive mechanics. I don't know anyone at 38 but if he's surrounded himself with solid talent, I think this title has the possibility to be a fun diversion. It certainly has a nice aesthetic.

E McNeill
profile image
I love R.A. Salvatore, I love Ken Rolston, I love Big Huge Games, I love open world RPGs, and I love original IPs. And everything they're saying in here sounds awesome to me. All that said, the video demos I've seen so far look terribly generic and soulless... so I choose to stay skeptical until release.

sean lindskog
profile image
Tim Coman sounds like a great art director. I like his process, and the way he involves his team. I also like how he talks about different art styles (bright WoW, desaturated "next gen") without putting them down, but rather just as being different, and instead focuses on what was right for Kingdoms of Amalur. The artwork I've seen for the game looks very good.

David McGraw
profile image
The passion emitting from this team is amazing. Every time I hear or read something come out of a team member I get amped. Awesome culture.



The game's art direction is really fantastic. I completely agree with Tim when he pointed out how frequent folks are pushing sequels. To have an origional IP to explore is going to be awesome.



@McNeill: I'm curious to see how you're viewing this thing. Define soulless / generic? What are you seeing (or not)?

E McNeill
profile image
I watched a video demo of the game (www.youtube.com/watch?v=AK3Mfn2smqo) and came away feeling like they were trying to check off all the standard "hardcore RPG" boxes. Loot, XP, crafting, races, etc. etc. These aren't bad things to have, but I don't think they're a good starting point in design. They should serve the broader game.



Beyond that, the writing and themes seemed far too familiar. Other elements too: "If you've played an RPG before you'll know there's more dangers in a dungeon than just enemies... sometimes you'll find traps." This language and sentiment screams "derivative" to me.



I don't need the game to be entirely new, but what's the value of an original, independently developed IP if it's just a collection of things we've all seen so many times before?

Harry Fields
profile image
A "derivative", accessible title is not a bad thing for a new studio to put out. Gotta' get the quid coming in :D

sean lindskog
profile image
I don't necessarily agree with E McNeill's assessment of the game, but I understand the sentiment. Designing off the beaten track is a brave, cool thing for a developer to do. But it's dangerous. Without relying on tried and true formulas, there are far more opportunities for mistakes that make the game "un-fun". It takes more iteration time, and so it's more expensive. And unfortunately, mainstream audiences are often resistant to change. Small, iterative improvements on existing designs, maybe. But big, risky changes often go (financially) unrewarded.

Matt Cratty
profile image
Curt has always been a personal hero because he was someone you could point to when "others" who didn't understand my passion for both the industry and gaming as a hobby said "you don't see adults doing this".



Plus he was an original EQ freak, which is major bonus points.



I'm rooting for him and his studio (and BHG) very, very hard.



Unless he produces something that could have come from Activision. Then I will never believe it will be different this time again.

Martin Sabom
profile image
Umm original EQ freak...how about original EQ bully.. We used to cringe when him and his guild used to demand crap and special attention because you know hes Curt Schilling. Of course the Execs at SOE always backed the guy up. Yeah whatever.

Bart Stewart
profile image
There's been some buzz that Curt Schilling is considering running for the U.S. House seat being opened up by today's announcement that Barney Frank is retiring after 16 terms.



I hope Gamasutra will look into this. It would obviously affect the Amalur games and 38 Games, but it might be very interesting to have someone in Congress who understands computer gaming.



Not that he'd win in that (even slightly redistricted) district, but it's fun to imagine. :)

Ramon Carroll
profile image
Out of all of the things that they are doing here, the best thing they have going for them, and likely the main thing that will catch people's attention, is the fact that they are building an entirely new fantasy IP, and that R.A. Salvatore is walking the halls there.



I love Curt, and I love Rolston. But I'm ecstatic about entering a brand new world, exploring it, and learning its history. I've been following their development on and off, and from what it sounds like, their lore is going to be as rich and detailed as that of IPs like the Forgotten Realms and The Elder Scrolls.

Joe McGinn
profile image
Great article, and the game sounds interesting too ... but man, "Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning"? You guys need someone who has done marketing 101 to do a reality check on your game name.


none
 
Comment:
 




UBM Tech