Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
The Storytelling Secrets of Virtue's Last Reward
arrowPress Releases
September 21, 2014
PR Newswire
View All





If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:


 
The Storytelling Secrets of Virtue's Last Reward

January 11, 2013 Article Start Previous Page 2 of 3 Next
 

Making Decisions in Virtue's Last Reward

There's also a key element to the decision-making process in Virtue's Last Reward; however, it's easy to overlook this as a player. "In my works, I feel like it's more common that the decision they made was super important after they made it rather than before they made it," Uchikoshi says.

On reflection, this may be the most important distinction between Virtue's Last Reward and other choice-based story games. In The Walking Dead, for example, your decisions generally have immediate effect, with small ripples into the later chapters of the game. In Virtue's Last Reward, however, you only understand the effect your decisions had in hindsight, as more information becomes available. This keeps the suspense level high and, perhaps even more importantly, avoids those awkward scenarios in which your choices, as it turns out, didn't matter at all.

In developing games -- as opposed to simply writing stories -- Uchikoshi sees one crucially important distinction. "There is one thing that games have that isn't present in any novel, manga, movie, anime, or drama, and that is what I call 'bi-directionality,'" says Uchikoshi. "A story that doesn't flow in a single direction -- that is the essence of a game scenario."

"The 'bi-directionality' I am talking about refers to the fact that there is interaction."

What sets Virtue's Last Reward apart from its predecessor, which has a similar premise and follows a similar format, is that flowchart -- the ability for the player to jump around in the story at will.

Rather than any decisions made within the context of the story, the interesting moments of player agency derive from what thread of the story he or she chooses to explore, and when.

As the threads reach their conclusions, new avenues open up. Some, rather than concluding, are merely blocked due to a lack of information on how to proceed. The player can actively search for the keys to these "locks" within other threads in the game's scenario. The keys are always information: you'll understand why something happened when you explore it from another angle, and then be able to proceed.

"In a novel or movie, the reader/audience member can be no more than an observer of events, but in a game you can take the role of the main character. In addition, having the player experience things from a first-person perspective rather than a third-person perspective gives the game a stronger impact and makes it more interesting," Uchikoshi observes.

He uses this trick of perspective not just to keep the player engrossed, but also to limit the player's knowledge in a realistic way -- you can only ever understand what you experience or are told. This then becomes an underpinning of the unfolding of the game itself, as parallel story tracks that spiral off in different directions offer avenues into information you could not have otherwise discovered.

There's not just the challenge of keeping player interest through so many paths; there's also the avoidance of repetition and fatigue. "I tried my best to have all of the scenarios develop differently with different outcomes," says Uchikoshi. "You have to provide a certain amount of motivation to make a player want to play through all nine scenarios. That part was very challenging."

The Tools to Weave a Tale

Uchikoshi designed the game's story flow using Excel, prototyping the potential outcomes of in-game scenarios. "After that, I matched the results with the chart I made and then came up with the nitty-gritty stories. When I came across situations that I couldn't get to work story-wise, I rewrote them in the Excel file."


VLR
's number 9 door

In VLR's Nonary Game, if any of the participants can open the door with the number 9 on it, they can escape. The only way to open this door is to get enough points -- and to earn points, the participants must blindly choose to ally or betray each other in the "AB Game" -- a game of trust.

Deciding what would happen in these AB Game scenarios complicated things for Uchikoshi. After deciding on the flow of the story, he says, "I then tried my best to balance out various results from the AB Game... However, if I changed the results of Round One, then everything in Round Two related to that result had to be changed, too. That part was very hard."

These AB Game decisions form the crux of the direct player choice system in Virtue's Last Reward, and much of the interpersonal conflict that is the engine of the game's character interactions.


Article Start Previous Page 2 of 3 Next

Related Jobs

Blizzard Entertainment
Blizzard Entertainment — Irvine, California, United States
[09.19.14]

Art Director - World of Warcraft
GREE International
GREE International — Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
[09.19.14]

Senior Game Designer
SAE Institute
SAE Institute — San Jose, California, United States
[09.19.14]

User Interface Design Instructor
SAE Institute
SAE Institute — San Jose, California, United States
[09.19.14]

Compositing Instructor






Comments


Joshua Darlington
profile image
Thanks! Sounds like a fun game. I will have play that.

I like the idea of "thought experiments." It reminds me of Portal. Glad that some people are tapping into game theory (interactive decision making) and modern physics for ideas.

Matt Robb
profile image
Sounds like turning Groundhog Day into a game design. I really like the idea.

Frank Washburn
profile image
999 had it's flaws (having to manually skip text and replay puzzles you had played before) but it's resolution was literally the most incredibly story resolution I had ever experienced. Zero Escape manages to even top it by working the fundamental disconnection of player knowledge vs. main character knowledge into the story line itself. My only worry is where they'll go for the final game, because while Zero Escape was busy blowing my brains out with plot twists, it showed quite a bit of its hand for the final game. Still looking forward to it. 999 and Zero Escape are truly "must-plays" for the DS/3DS/Vita.

James Margaris
profile image
"Zero Escape manages to even top it by working the fundamental disconnection of player knowledge vs. main character knowledge into the story line itself."

This has been a sort of fatal flaw in these kinds of games in the past. As the player you learn more about the story but as the character you don't retain that knowledge. As the player you want to try new decisions but the only way to do that was to start over. In 999 it felt like the idea of the character learning from the replay experiences was on the tip of their tongue.

Being able to travel back to decision points is something you really want to do as a player (as opposed to just starting over) and having an in-game explanation for that mechanic is almost the Holy Grail of this sort of game. Have not VLR yet, looking forward to it.

James Yee
profile image
If only they'd bring it to PC so I could play it.... :(

Filipe Salles
profile image
I haven't played any of those, but I think I will have to play them now.

Thanks for sparking my curiosity, the different approach that these games, regarding development of the stories, seem to offer are really interesting.

Jordane Thiboust
profile image
Very nice game indeed. I enjoyed the storytelling of Virtue's last reward and 999 very much. I can't recommend them enough!


none
 
Comment: