GAME JOBS
Contents
From XNA to MonoGame
 
 
Printer-Friendly VersionPrinter-Friendly Version
 
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
June 6, 2013
 
Wargaming.net
Build Engineer
 
Gameloft - New York
Programmer
 
Wargaming.net
Build Engineer
 
Virdyne Technologies
Unity Programmer
 
Wargaming.net
Quality Assurance Analyst
 
Wargaming.net
Python Developer
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
June 6, 2013
 
Free to Play: A Call for Games Lacking Challenge
 
Cracking the Touchscreen Code [1]
 
10 Business Law and Tax Law Steps to Improve the Chance of Crowdfunding Success
 
Deep Plaid Games, one year later
 
The Competition of Sportsmanship in Online Games
spacer
About
spacer Editor-In-Chief:
Kris Graft
Blog Director:
Christian Nutt
Senior Contributing Editor:
Brandon Sheffield
News Editors:
Mike Rose, Kris Ligman
Editors-At-Large:
Leigh Alexander, Chris Morris
Advertising:
Jennifer Sulik
Recruitment:
Gina Gross
Education:
Gillian Crowley
 
Contact Gamasutra
 
Report a Problem
 
Submit News
 
Comment Guidelines
 
Blogging Guidelines
Sponsor
Features
  From XNA to MonoGame
by Dean Ellis [Programming, Game Developer Magazine, Console/PC, Indie, Smartphone/Tablet]
12 comments Share on Twitter Share on Facebook RSS
 
 
May 15, 2013 Article Start Previous Page 5 of 6 Next
 

Pushing Performance

Both the iOS and Android versions of MonoGame run on top of the mono platform. Mono has a great compiler, and these two mobile platforms also include a linker, which is used to reduce the package size of your application by removing code that is not needed. It also has a really good garbage collector, but even though there have been some major advances in the mono GC in the last few years, you still have to remember you are running on mobile devices which vary dramatically in terms of power (especially when it comes to Android devices). Make sure to look at your Update methods; you might be making work for the GC by creating lots of temporary objects that will just be disposed of. You should also think about whether you actually need to do a particular calculation in a certain way -- after all, the fastest code is the code that doesn't get executed. Consider the following class definition:

public class Player



{

  public Vector2 Position;

  public Vector2 Scale;

  public void Update(GameTime gameTime) { … }

 public void Draw(GameTime gameTime) { … }

}

In this segment, we are defining a player that has a position and a scale. Now suppose we are using the Matrix property of the sprite batch to render this player using the position and scale data, and also we are using that information for collision detection. One easy way to create the matrix is to do it in the update method like so:

var matrix = Matrix.CreateTransform(Position) * Matrix.CreateScale(Scale);

On desktop machines, this would probably work just fine, but on lower-powered mobile devices it could be a problem. Even though the Matrix class is a struct, and cheap to create, we are still making this calculation every call to Update. If your game is running at 30 frames per second, that alone is many matrix calculations that you might not have had to do. Instead, you could declare a field for the Matrix and just update it in the Update method. Or, even better, you could just update the Matrix only when the Position or Scale properties are changed (see Listing 2).

Listing 2: Optimizing update calls for mobile devices.

public class Player

{

  Vector2 position;

  Vector2 scale;

  Matrix matrix;

 public Vector2 Position {

   get { return position;}

   set {

       if (position != value) {

          position = value;

          UpdateMatrix();

       }

   }

 }

public Vector2 Scale {

   get { return scale;}

   set {

       if (scale != value) {

          scale = value;

          UpdateMatrix();

       }

   }

 }

 public void UpdateMatrix() {

   matrix = Matrix.CreateTransform(Position) * Matrix.CreateScale(Scale);

 }

  public void Update(GameTime gameTime) { … }

 public void Draw(GameTime gameTime) { … }

}

I know this is a simple example, but if it gets you thinking about what tiny improvements you can make, then it has done its job. Those of you who know your math will know that you can probably remove the scale and position fields from this class, and just store the matrix. 

 
Article Start Previous Page 5 of 6 Next
 
Top Stories

image
Keeping the simulation dream alive
image
A 15-year-old critique of the game industry that's still relevant today
image
Advanced audio streaming in Unity
image
Amazon launches dedicated indie games storefront
Comments

Thomas Happ
profile image
I've been trying to determine if monogame is compatible with the Playstation Mobile development kit (which is also C#). I think that would be quite handy given Sony's recent indie push!

Tom Spilman
profile image
MonoGame does have PSM support.

Kevin Gadd
profile image
We're using MonoGame on PSM right now. It's way better than trying to port from scratch.

Pedro Kayatt
profile image
Would like to suggest to take a look into the Cocos2d-x for XNA. People have been using it with MonoGame with success and porting the game to as many platforms as you would like!
XNA is good, don't get me wrong, but using a simple engine to take the best of it seems to be the best!

David Amador
profile image
Nice article. and thanks for the plug to my blog :)

Cheers

David Keyworth
profile image
XNA's always been awesome, but now that it's completely cross-platform it's been pretty cool to see all the professional games coming out of a managed C# environment.
Sadly, given that even a basic, clean-installed content-project setup on Windows gives all sorts of warnings and errors for me, I'm under the impression that MonoGame is essentially still an "early development" product that takes quite a lot of effort for an amature coder like me to get running smoothly. I may start my future projects in Microsoft XNA, hoping that the Mono project matures a bit further in the near future, for the ease of usability Microsoft's project has.

Curtis Turner - IceIYIaN
profile image
Shows about 3,000 games on XBLIG:
http://marketplace.xbox.com/en-US/Games/XboxIndieGames?SortBy=ReleaseDate

On Windows Phone I have no idea. Windows Phone 8's can use something other than XNA:
http://www.windowsphone.com/en-us/store/top-rated-games

On Windows it doesn't seem like many XBLIG crossed over. However, the prices for these games are slightly higher.

I suggest developers try and get different resolutions and input methods into their games.

Robert Schmidt
profile image
Anyone ever heard of Silversprite? I've been burned too many times by ambitious open source projects that run out of steam after people have invested a great deal into them. Unity3D is a cross platform version of what XNA should have been. I recommend new game developers invest their time in that.

Wendelin Reich
profile image
Not for the first time, I had to think about how open source tends to fail in the games area. Of course, I would love to see MonoGame succeed, but I'm not naive enough to bet my money (i.e. my time) on it.

Is the problem that games are so hardware-dependent? Even _huge_ open source projects such as the Linux kernel tend to have problems keeping up with hardware evolution (and thats one reason why Linux and games is still a problematic combination).

Or is the problem that game developers have strong economic incentives not to share full-fledged, working code projects? If so, then why does open source work in other areas of IT?

Yet another reason is that game developers have unusually high demands on software reliability. People will accept if OpenOffice crashes (it has auto-save), but a game that crashes tends to be a HUGE turnoff to users. Perhaps thats because (often) games have so extremely complex internal state, which is difficult to reproduce (either for the user via replay, or via a sufficiently fine-grained auto-save).

Dylan Wilson
profile image
MonoGame has a very unique market in that existing XNA developers can port their games to many other platforms including Android and iOS with relatively little effort.

Comparing it to Silversprite isn't even in the same ballpark. Unity3D is a perfectly fine option for developing games but it's not direct competition for MonoGame. Unity3D is a full game engine, whereas MonoGame is a replacement for the XNA framework. They solve different problems.

Brian Perry
profile image
I started out being very excited that I could develop XNA games using mono-game from linux using mono-develop. After doing a simple game though, I realized that you needed a windows machine in order to put art into mono-game. If your developing on Mac or Linux then, your out of luck. They said they were developing an art pipeline for mac and linux so I guess I have to wait until then.

Dean Ellis
profile image
Believe it or not SilverSprite is kind of the GrandFather of MonoGame :)

As for Mac development as the article says you can make use of raw assets like png etc, there are only a few content types where you MUST use the content pipeline, fonts and effects are the main ones.


none
 
Comment:
 




UBM Tech