Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
Making Knack: An interview with Mark Cerny
View All     RSS
September 21, 2014
arrowPress Releases
September 21, 2014
PR Newswire
View All





If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:


 
Making Knack: An interview with Mark Cerny

December 20, 2013 Article Start Page 1 of 4 Next
 

Knack is the first game that Mark Cerny has ever directed, but his industry resume is intense. In 1984, he developed the Atari classic Marble Madness, and later he went down in platformer history both at Sega, where he worked on Sonic the Hedgehog 2, and Sony, where he worked on Crash Bandicoot.

More recently, Cerny has contributed to franchises like Jak and Daxter, Ratchet & Clank, and God of War, to name a very few, as he has taken on consulting work for Sony-published projects.

For the PlayStation 4's launch, though, Cerny got extremely ambitious. He served as the system's lead architect, as detailed in Gamasutra's extensive technical interview. He also directed Knack at the same time he was overseeing the hardware's development.

The game has released to decidedly mixed reviews, but Cerny truly understands the ins and outs of game development -- and in this interview, he shares his insights into game design and production and creating a game that appeals to multiple audiences, while also discussing the soul of the PlayStation.

You've been creating character action games for a long time. Obviously, technical things have changed a lot, but has your approach to them changed over the years?

Mark Cerny: Well, one thing that's changed a lot is we used to make these games for ourselves, and now we make them for gamers. If you go back to how we made Sonic or the first Crash Bandicoot, we'd just sit in a room and build levels, and basically nobody would play the game until it was out on the market... and then we'd find out, usually, that it was so difficult as to be nearly uncompletable. The original Crash Bandicoot is legendary for that! These days we're a lot more in tune with people's play styles, and whether they enjoy themselves or not.

To be clear, I'm not talking about dumbing down a game via focus tests. I'm just saying that these days we do a lot of playtests, find out how people play these games, and then as a team we're free to use that information however we want to.

We can take the Portal approach, which is to say we make sure every challenge seamlessly leads into the next one, because we learned that's how to get people into a groove... or we can take the Braid approach, where the challenge is different every time and requires the player to be in a different mental space every time. Both approaches are great, it's just that I believe we need to make tuning decisions based on an understanding of the player's experiences.

Have you done a lot of player testing on Knack?

MC: Yes! Because games in general are very easy to make difficult, we started with the game on its easier difficulty settings, and studied how non-gamers did with it. After one or two fairly awful initial tests we managed to get to the point where yes, on an easy setting, the game was something that people with no games background whatsoever could really play and enjoy.

Something unique here is that with the testing I'd done for Crash, Spyro, Jak, Ratchet, Resistance, and the like, we could assume the players had some understanding of what a game was. So at the point in time when we had some part of the game done, we'd have a playtest and watch consumers play it.

Usually, the first levels that we work on are from the middle of the game. We try not to start by creating the very first level of the game, because we want the first level to be one of the very best, and we therefore want to create it towards the end of the project when we've learned a lot about how to make quality gameplay.

What that means is that the first playtest is therefore testing the player's experience with content from the middle of the game. All previous tests -- Crash, Spyro, and so on -- had been with gamers, and they handled that just fine. What I found out on Knack, though, is that non-gamers had great difficulty coping with starting in the middle of the game. We couldn't really understand how they would approach the game until we had our first level in place.


Article Start Page 1 of 4 Next

Related Jobs

Infinity Ward / Activision
Infinity Ward / Activision — Woodland Hills, California, United States
[09.20.14]

Producer - Infinity Ward
Infinity Ward / Activision
Infinity Ward / Activision — Woodland Hills, California, United States
[09.20.14]

Senior Tools Engineer - Infinity Ward
Blizzard Entertainment
Blizzard Entertainment — Irvine, California, United States
[09.19.14]

Senior Vice President, Cross Media
Blizzard Entertainment
Blizzard Entertainment — Irvine, California, United States
[09.19.14]

Lead 3D Character Artist - New Unannounced Title






Comments


Jarod Smiley
profile image
Just make sure you make a Knack 2 Mark! My wife loved this game!

I think reviews would have been a lot more favorable as well if the title was priced lower than the standard next-gen game. Users generally loved it, while critics were very critical, I think a $40 or $30 tag would have made everyone just play it for what it is and not be so critical of what it doesn't accomplish.

The core is there for some very interesting concepts though, I hope it sells enough to fund a sequel!

Luke Baker
profile image
I second the other commenter. I absolutely loved Knack. It is essentially, to me, a harder Crash Bandicoot that is more open. I don't know what reviewers were expecting.

Many people who actually own the game like it a lot.

It is one of my favorite games on the PS4 now.

The game is like an old-school platformer. I dig it and would buy a sequel someday too.

Jonathan Murphy
profile image
Game was blah. Take More Risks!

Cid Newman
profile image
I thought the games visuals were absolutely beautiful, the controls felt great, but the gameplay did get a little bit boring after awhile. It felt like one or two levels worth of gameplay stretched out to fill an entire game. Still, overall I enjoyed it.

Mike Smith
profile image
Poor frame rate and long load times and mediocre game play. I was very disappointed.

Theresa Catalano
profile image
It's a bit shocking how under-designed the gameplay is in Knack. It's almost as if it's not meant to have good gameplay, as if it's meant to be as simplistic and mind numbing as possible. Maybe they think the way to design a game for kids is to dumb it down as much as possible, and just have cartoons playing to distract you. In any case, Knack is certainly one of the big failures of the year.

Merc Hoffner
profile image
I haven't played it yet, but this may go some way as to an explanation of what they were going for:

http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/195940/

Unfortunately it sounds like the all inclusive approach hasn't assembled into a breakout product. I think this is probably a common facet of launch games, afflicted by a punishing schedule and fractured across appealing to early adopters, selling the machine's power, and selling the image of a machine for all demographics. This is too many task masters to create something simultaneously coherent and exceptional. The clearest exception to the launch problem in my mind is Mario 64 - and that was only achieved by delaying the whole machine. As powerful as he is, Mark Cerny could never hope for that kind of leeway, and we're evidently the poorer for it.


none
 
Comment: