Our Properties: Gamasutra GameCareerGuide IndieGames Indie Royale GDC IGF Game Developer Magazine GAO
My Message close
Contents
Game Design Cognition: The Bottom-Up And Top-Down Approaches
 
 
Printer-Friendly VersionPrinter-Friendly Version
 
Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
February 10, 2012
 
Analyst questions validity of unusual January NPD results [3]
 
DICE 2012: Blizzard's Pearce on World Of Warcraft's launch hangover
 
DICE 2012: Insomniac's Price on Quality Of Life, ditching the 'Loser' badge [2]
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
February 10, 2012
 
Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC
Audio Tools Engineer
 
Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC
World Wide Studios Technical Product Manager
 
Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC
Senior Software Application Engineer
 
Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC
Senior Gamer Insights Specialist
 
High 5 Games
Technical Artist
 
Airtight Games
Art Director
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
February 10, 2012
 
arrow Principles of an Indie Game Bottom Feeder [18]
 
arrow Postmortem: CyberConnect 2's Solatorobo: Red the Hunter [1]
 
arrow Jerked Around by the Magic Circle - Clearing the Air Ten Years Later [39]
 
arrow Building the World of Reckoning [4]
 
arrow SPONSORED FEATURE: TwitchTV - How to Build Community Around Your Game in 2012 [13]
 
arrow Happy Action, Happy Developer: Tim Schafer on Reimagining Double Fine [9]
 
arrow Building an iOS Hit: Phase 1 [11]
 
arrow Postmortem: Appy Entertainment's SpellCraft School of Magic [5]
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
February 10, 2012
 
Audio Passes: Success Through Layering
 
What the current RPG can learn from Diablo 1
 
Double Fine's Kickstarter Windfall: Will Patronage Supplant Traditional Game Publishing? [5]
 
The Principles of Game Monetization
 
Did DoubleFine Just break the publishing model for good? [11]
spacer
About
spacer Editor-In-Chief/News Director:
Kris Graft
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Senior Contributing Editor:
Brandon Sheffield
News Editors:
Frank Cifaldi, Tom Curtis, Mike Rose, Eric Caoili, Kris Graft
Editors-At-Large:
Leigh Alexander, Chris Morris
Advertising:
Jennifer Sulik
Recruitment:
Gina Gross
 
Feature Submissions
 
Comment Guidelines
Sponsor
Features
  Game Design Cognition: The Bottom-Up And Top-Down Approaches
by Gilliard Lopes, Rafael Kuhnen [Game Design]
2 comments Share on Twitter Share on Facebook RSS
 
 
November 14, 2007 Article Start Page 1 of 5 Next
 

It is often said that there is one single word that ties both ends of the process of designing a game, being its cause and consequence. That word is "fun". But just how is it possible to create fun? What drives the creative force inside game designers and developers to define, specify and ultimately implement concepts that are entertaining by nature?

Such a process is called Game Design Cognition, and it is absolutely necessary to understand and improve it if we want to evolve as an industry that creates fun out of thin air. However, the subject of meta-design applied to games is barely mentioned in the reference material about game design that we see today. Thus, this article introduces a proposed breakdown of the cognitive process behind game design, enabling the discussion of different methods that are intuitively used, but seldom understood, by game designers.


For example, take the award-winning action game God of War. The process of designing such a game probably involved, in some order, the definition of its main concept (an epic, gripping third-person action game centered on a brutal anti-hero), context and environment (conflict among the gods in ancient Greece, in which the protagonist gets personally involved), features and content (combos, weapons, levels), mechanics and verbs (the divine powers system, the power-ups, the player's actions such as jump, light attack and heavy attack).

However, the process of putting this whole picture together is never as streamlined as our quick analysis would assume. Rather, designing a game in practice often involves multiple traversals up and down those layers, in a much more organic fashion. Therefore, this article comprises the study of each layer and its relationships with the others, presenting them as a hierarchical structure for an easier understanding of the top-down and bottom-up approaches to game design cognition.

Gilliard: Look! Can you see the marvels of game design cognition being applied in this case? Do you realize how the basic verbs and mechanics have translated into an amazing game concept?
Rafael: Yeah... I see “kick butts” translating into “awesome boss fight”!

Cognition in Game Design

The cognitive process of designing a game begins with an idea. Sometimes it is a concept that we want to translate into play; sometimes it is gameplay that we want to turn into concept. The process of turning such ideas into palpable material, which then becomes a game, is composed of several journeys of thought and specification back and forth between these two extremes. Filling the space in between with concepts that break down the design of a game into working parts is the core of this article, as seen in the next section.

A Layered View of a Game's Design

Examining complex processes is never an easy task; thus, approaches that try to divide such complexity into smaller parts that can be more easily understood are necessary. This is called analysis. Analyzing the game design cognition process is a critical part of developing a deeper understanding about how such process works.

Therefore, we propose the following layered view as a breakdown of the game design cognitive process, where each layer corresponds to a generalization or abstraction of the layers below it, and a specialization or concretization of the layers above it.

Each layer is described in detail in the following sections.

 
Article Start Page 1 of 5 Next
 
Comments

Ronildson Palermo
profile image
Couldn't help but notice the article, even after so much time since it's been written. A great starting point for any student I'd say.

It's always nice to know how other designers work, compare methods, perhaps even agree on some points. Interestingly enough I had a very similar layer structure, different names and different numbers. But it struck me, nonetheless, that our approaches were quite similar.

Running on the small probability any of the authors will read this, I leave this comment for any other person who eventually reads it in the future. Again, great article!

Gilliard Lopes
profile image
Thank you for your comment, Ronildson! Too bad Gamasutra did not allow comments back when we published this article...

I am convinced that game designers often have very similar methods of approaching their craft, without knowing it. And one of the reasons for this is that there is not enough material out there about what goes inside the GD's mind, what makes them tick and come up with their solutions and ideas. I am happy to see that this article can become a starting point for people to think and rationalize more about the cognitive processes in Game Design in the future. Thanks for reading!


none
 
Comment:
 




UBM Techweb
Game Network
Game Developers Conference | GDC Europe | GDC Online | GDC China | Gamasutra | Game Developer Magazine | Game Advertising Online
Game Career Guide | Independent Games Festival | Indie Royale | IndieGames

Other UBM TechWeb Networks
Business Technology | Business Technology Events | Telecommunications & Communications Providers

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Contact Us | Copyright © UBM TechWeb, All Rights Reserved.