Contents
Simple Intersection Tests For Games
 
 
Printer-Friendly VersionPrinter-Friendly Version
 
Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
September 5, 2010
 
In-Depth: Pitchford On How Gearbox Got To Own Duke Nukem Franchise [1]
 
PAX Prime 2010: Warren Spector on Game Culture in the Mainstream [35]
 
Red 5 Studios Announces Free-to-Play MMO Firefall [2]
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
September 5, 2010
 
SILICON KNIGHTS
TECH/TOOLS PROGRAMMER
 
SILICON KNIGHTS
Level Designer
 
SILICON KNIGHTS
GAME DESIGNERS
 
SILICON KNIGHTS
Gameplay Programmer
 
BioWare Mythic
2D/3D Artist
 
Kabam
QA Lead for social gaming company
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
September 5, 2010
 
arrow Deus Ex: The Human Question [2]
 
arrow Game Dev Collaboration: Google Docs Style [11]
 
arrow A Journey Across the Main Stream: Games for My Mother-in-Law [28]
 
arrow An Artist's Eye: Applying Art Techniques to Game Design [8]
 
arrow Working In 'A Dying Genre On A Dying Platform' [14]
 
arrow Service in the Age of Social Media: The Next Frontier for Gaming Companies
 
arrow Not So Cryptic: Neverwinter And A Studio Reboot [11]
 
arrow Sponsored Feature: Make an Impact at Sledgehammer Games
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
September 5, 2010
 
Budget for decision making
 
Kinect and Move: from Vision to Retail [1]
 
Who Dares Wins: ProtoPlay 2010 Report
 
MMOs: Just a Matter of Time? [10]
 
Where Shank's Boss Battles Went Wrong [6]
spacer
About
spacer News Director:
Leigh Alexander
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Senior News Editor:
Kris Graft
Advertising:
John 'Malik' Watson
Recruitment/Education:
Gina Gross
 
Feature Submissions
Sponsor
Features
  Simple Intersection Tests For Games
by Miguel Gomez
0 comments Share on Twitter Share on Facebook RSS
 
 
October 18, 1999 Article Start Page 1 of 7 Next
 

Whether it's your car crossing the finish line at 180 miles per hour, or a bullet tearing through the chest of your best friend, all games make use of collision detection for object interaction. This article describes some simple intersection tests for the most useful shapes: spheres and boxes.

Sweep Tests for Moving Objects


A common approach to collision detection is to simply test for whether two objects are overlapping at the end of each frame. The problem with this method is that quickly moving objects can pass through each other without detection. To avoid this problem, their trajectories can be subdivided and the objects checked for overlap at each point; however, this gets expensive if either object experienced a large displacement. On the other hand, a sweep test can efficiently determine a lower and upper bound for the time of overlap, which can then be used as more optimal starting points for the subdivision algorithm.

A Sphere-Plane Sweep Test

Figure 1 shows an example of a quickly moving sphere passing through a plane. It can be seen that C0 is on the positive side of the plane and C1 is on its negative side.

Kuras
Figure 1. A sphere passes through a plane.

 

In general, if a sphere penetrated a plane at some point during the frame, then d0>r and d1<r, where r is the radius of the sphere and d0 and d1 are the signed distances from the plane to C0 and C1, respectively. The signed distance from a point C to a plane can be calculated with the formula

More efficiently, we can store the plane in the form {n, D}, where

The distance d is then calculated

The trajectory from C0 to C1 can be parameterized with a variable u, which may be thought of as normalized time, since its value is 0 at C0 and 1 at C1. The normalized time at which the sphere first intersects the plane is given by

The center of the sphere at this time can then be interpolated with an affine combination of C0 and C1

This formula interpolates Ci correctly as long as d0 is not equal to d1 (which is the case if displacement has occurred), even when r = 0 (the case of a line segment). If desired, the parameter u can also be used to linearly interpolate the orientation of an object at this point.

In this example, it was assumed that the sphere approached the plane from the positive side and that the sphere was not already penetrating the plane at C0.. In the case that there could have been penetration on the previous frame, the condition |d0|<=r should also be checked. Listing 1 gives an implementation of this sphere-plane sweep test.

Listing 1. A sphere-plane sweep test.

#include "vector.h"

class PLANE

{

 

public:

VECTOR N;
//unit normal

SCALAR D;
//distance from the plane to the origin from a
//normal and a point

PLANE( const VECTOR& p0, const VECTOR& n ): N(n), D(-N.dot(p0))
{}
//from 3 points

PLANE( const VECTOR& p0, const VECTOR& p1,
const VECTOR& p2 ): N((p1-p0).cross(p2-p0).unit()),
D(-N.dot(p0))
{}
//signed distance from the plane topoint 'p' along
//the unit normal

const SCALAR distanceToPoint( const VECTOR& p ) const
{

 

 

return N.dot(p) + D;

}

};

const bool SpherePlaneSweep
(
const SCALAR r, //sphere radius
const VECTOR& C0, //previous position of sphere
const VECTOR& C1, //current position of sphere
const PLANE& plane, //the plane
VECTOR& Ci, //position of sphere when it first touched the plane
SCALAR& u //normalized time of collision

)

{

const SCALAR d0 = plane.distanceToPoint( C0 );
const SCALAR d1 = plane.distanceToPoint( C1 );

//check if it was touching on previous frame
if( fabs(d0) <= r )

{

 

Ci = C0;
u = 0;
return true;

}

//check if the sphere penetrated during this frame
if( d0>r && d1<r )
{

 

u = (d0-r)/(d0-d1); //normalized time
Ci = (1-u)*C0 + u*C1; //point of first contact
return true;

}

return false;

}

For the definition of the VECTOR class, please see [3].

 
Article Start Page 1 of 7 Next
 
Comments


none
 
Comment:
 


Submit Comment