Contents
The Adventurer's Guide to Thievery
 
 
Printer-Friendly VersionPrinter-Friendly Version
 
Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
Video Game Watchdog National Institute On Media And The Family Shutting Down [11]
 
Modern Warfare 2 Infinity Ward's 'Most Successful PC Version' Yet [12]
 
New Tech, Design Details Of Project Natal To Emerge At Gamefest In February
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
Trion Redwood City
Sr. Evnironment Modeler
 
Trion Redwood City
Sr. Environment Artist
 
Sucker Punch Productions
3D Environment Artist
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Network Programmer
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Character Artist
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Texture Artist
 
Monolith Productions
Sr. Software Engineer, Engine - Monolith Productions - #113767
 
Sony Online Entertainment
Brand Manager
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
arrow Upping The Craft: Susan O'Connor On Games Writing [6]
 
arrow Small Developers: Minimizing Risks in Large Productions - Part II [7]
 
arrow iPhone Piracy: The Inside Story [48]
 
arrow And Yet It Grows: Analyzing the Size and Growth of the European Game Market [5]
 
arrow NPD: Behind the Numbers, October 2009 [13]
 
arrow Reflecting On Uncharted 2: How They Did It [5]
 
arrow Sponsored Feature: Rasterization on Larrabee -- Adaptive Rasterization Helps Boost Efficiency
 
arrow Postmortem: Wadjet Eye's The Blackwell Convergence [2]
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
Time Fcuk
 
Accepting the Inherent Value of Games
 
Planckogenesis, Part II: Song Structure & Gravy Train [1]
spacer
About
spacer News Director:
Leigh Alexander
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Editor At Large:
Chris Remo
Advertising:
John 'Malik' Watson
Recruitment/Education:
Gina Gross
 
Features
  The Adventurer's Guide to Thievery
by Tom Smith
8 comments
Share RSS
 
 
June 12, 2008 Article Start Previous Page 3 of 7 Next
 

Player-Driven Recovery

Healing in 4E is handled very differently than previous editions. The old system required players to either use magic items to heal, or rely on the priest to spent his actions casting spells. This meant that the cleric spent most of their time healing others rather than directly affecting things.

The new system gives all players "healing surges" that they can use once per encounter to regain one quarter of their health.

Advertisement

And the healing classes (there are now two: cleric and warlord) can heal and attack on the same turn or even as part of the same action, so they can provide a meaningful attack presence while also helping others.

One of the nice results of this system is that all players have a hand in healing. Using a Healing Surge is a conscious decision the player makes that aids his character. Everyone feels involved, and healing is something the players do, not something others do to them.

This also has the side benefit of making it feel like the player's fault when it goes wrong: "I should have used a healing surge" rather than "How come the game didn't heal me faster?" The lesson here is that healing doesn't have to be a background passive action. Give the player inputs, and he becomes more involved.

For most video games, directly adapting healing surges wouldn't be the best idea. Variants of this have worked in some cases: health packs in many games were basically a stolen version of healing potions.

But as health packs show, it can be difficult to manage health as a resource while worrying about five other thing in real-time.

That's where the healing classes can provide some additional inspiration -- having player attacks that alter healing rates as a side effect could be interesting in a variety of games, especially cooperative ones.

Give the player ways to alter his healing, but without adding new actions that could overload the process.

Location-Based Combat

D&D has always been about the monsters. But there's a dungeon in there with the dragons, which often gets neglected. And while the sense of place depends highly on the individual DMs setting up interesting encounters, the new edition provides tools to make it easier to craft unique encounters that are more than just monsters.

Terrain rules are clear and simple, and include many examples of interesting magical terrain with solid gameplay effects. But traps are where the DM has the most control of the combat space.

Traps get more attention in 4E, with the intent of integrating traps within a combat encounter. The character doesn't disable the poison darts in one room and fight the kobolds in the next -- they're all in the same room.

Traps are designed to be recurring dangers that threaten players and monsters with a variety of effects during combat.

And many of the new special powers, for player characters and monsters both, involve pushing each other around the room, giving all those traps and other danger zones interesting strategic roles. A good DM can quickly set up different rooms that create dramatically different combat experiences.

 
Article Start Previous Page 3 of 7 Next
 
Comments

Trace o'Connor
profile image
Great article! I enjoyed this commentary on gaming in general; I sent links to this article to friends and forums covering games in several different media - vidego games, table-top RPGs and even LARP. Well put together and very inspirational, thanks! -- I'm also laughing wondering how many random dragon people and devil people we'll see in different forms next year.

Tim Carter
profile image
The one thing I take issue to is the bogus notion there are no new ideas. That idea applies to one thing: character-based storytelling (you know... the old thing that there are only so-many stories to tell, and Shakespeare told them all). In creations that are world-based (not character-based), such as games, this is simply not true. In the outside world, ideas scale up to infinity. That's why we still have scientists making new discoveries. For example, every time a new technology comes along, there are untapped potentials to it. To tap one is to come up with a *new idea*. Saying there are no new ideas is like saying there are no new worlds to discover.

Anonymous
profile image
Grassroots, you've again missed the point of the article. It's not saying there are no new ideas and we "must" use this. The article is pointing out how well thought out the new 4ed rules for DnD are and how we can take from these ideas they've used to improve our own.
For instance earlier when it mentioned about how the system simplified the use of skills. The point here isn't that you're meant to simply any skill system you have. The point is that a heavily abstract list like what they had in 3ed is counter productive to a smooth running game and it made values that were 0s nearly useless to the player. They took a cumbersome system and made it more streamlined and fitting to the feel they wanted. Which has nothing to do with there being "no new ideas".

As to my feelings on this, I love the article, very informative and I have to say some very good points. I have noticed as a designer I have a tendancy to make systems more complex than they really have to be.

Shaun Huang
profile image
IMO, this article is a great (albeit a bit lengthy) explanation of why people interested in game design should check out D&D if they never bothered before. However, in terms of grasping the “soul” of 4th edition, I think you’re missing a few core concepts of the revolution that the 4th Ed. Teams tried to make, such as the jump from rule-centric to role-centric design philosophies when approaching the entire game. I recommend listening to their podcasts on wizards.com and reading their developer’s blogs to help expertise your way to getting the complete picture of 4th ED. They’re your behind-the-scene DVD to the development of 4th Edition.

I absolutely hated the random and inappropriate shout out to Miyamoto in the end. He abandoned the core audience to cater to casuals, so he definitely does not belong in an article about D&D 4th edition, a game that proves that you don't have to sacrifice the core to reach out to the casuals. You should’ve mentioned Will Wright or at the very least, Blizzard/Harmonix for creating great games that take creativity from everyday people and everyday life but truly translating them into great games, not half-baked attempts. :p

Extra tidbit on Miyamoto: When asked if Mario Galaxy drew any inspirations from Rachet and Clank with the spherical level designs, he said "Rachet and Clank? I've never heard of that game. Is it a PC game?” I’ve never personally played R&C but how can anyone serious about game design and “innovation” not know R&C? Plus, what kind of response was “Is it a pc game?” Any game he never heard of must be on PC?

Tom Smith
profile image
Hi. Thanks for the responses, everyone.

Shaun, great point about the D&D blogs and podcasts - lots of good design philosophy there. And many of their core design tips apply to video games as well as RPGs. The Magic the Gathering ones are worth checking out, too.

I'm sorry if the Miyamoto thing didn't work for you. I've always drawn inspiration from his talks on how gardening influenced the design of Pikmin, which I consider to be a great example of seeing game design in the world around you. Which is what I was trying to get to, as plucking design secrets from everyday things is the ultimate expression of thievery. But I may have rushed that point a bit.

Anne Toole
profile image
Great thieving in this article ;) Since D&D has been such a big influence on me, I noted this week on my blog a lot of the overlap between how DMs are encourage to view their players (Power Gamer, Instigator) with the player types for MMOs. Maybe D&D can steal a bit from that world as well?

The DM Guide, among other things, points out that you can create a game with more moral ambiguity rather than being strictly heroic. While we've seen some video games with ambiguity, heroic definitely wins out in most cases. Maybe video games still have a lot to learn from D&D?

Billy Bissette
profile image
It is interesting that you've written an article on stealing the changes in 4th edition for videogames when people have described 4th edition development as trying to turn D&D into an MMORPG.

"Published modules can define discrete skill challenges as a way to structure to that annoying time between combats." is also an interesting comment. I haven't played D&D for many years, but I remember when the time between combat was meant to be interesting in its own right without being boiled down to discrete skill challenges. Your comment makes it sound like if you aren't rolling dice, then you can't be having fun. (Which seems at times to be a theme behind 4th edition's design as well.)

And while you call "health packs" a stolen version of D&D's "healing potions," to me "healing surges" seem similar to the "quick recovery when resting" trend that blazed across FPS and even some third-person shooters. They certainly seem grounded in the same logic, of only needing a moment to freely get yourself immediately back into the battle rather than having to squander resources spend precious time being cautious while in search of an external means of healing.

Tom Smith
profile image
Billy, you're right - I should know better than to try to use sarcasm in a digitial medium. 'that annoying time between combats' is normally the focus of the game when I play RPGs, since I'm a story-based role-playing (100% on the Robin Laws scale). So partially I was just exaggerating other people's views to make a point - it's a bad habit of mine.

But I was also trying to indicate that the time between combats has historically been a difficult time for designers to deal with. Both electronic and role-playing games have their roots in combat-heavy scenarios, so stretching the design outside of combat space has traditionally been an after-thought for the big releases. Of course, there are plenty of other, smaller games (both digital and paper) that explore those spaces in interesting ways, but I'm honestly happy to see the granddaddy of them all - D&D - explore that space a little more than previous editions.

And on the broader issue of D&D and MMORPG similarities, I tried to address that a touch in the text by pointing out how well D&D has managed to take good ideas from other sources without diluting their own feel. I don't think D&D is just mindlessly copying MMOs - I think they're doing a very clever job of stealing the right ideas and applying them well. But it doesn't mean that D&D is no longer D&D, at least to me.


none
 
Comment:
 


Submit Comment