|
Another mixed reality game with
performative results is ITVS's World
Without Oil, an ARG about a global oil crisis created by Ken Eklund and
Jane McGonigal. To play, participants created stories about their imagined
strategies to get through daily life during an oil shortfall. Some wrote or
recorded hypothetical accounts, while others literally enacted oil-saving
strategies like planting community gardens or starting carpools. Doing so contributed
to oil conservation in real ways, even if small ones.
Carnegie Mellon computer scientists Manuel
Blum and Luis von Ahn's human computation games offer a very different example.
Now aggregated at gwap.com, the best known is probably the ESP Game, in which two remote players see the same image and try to
guess words the other would use to describe them.
As the game finds a match, it
not only rewards points but also stores the matching terms as descriptive tags
for the images. Google has even licensed the game (as the Google Image Labeler)
to train its image search algorithm. Other Gwap games work similarly: Tag a Tune for identifying music, Squigl for identifying object positions
within images.
In Cruel
2 B Kind and World Without Oil,
the reality mixed into the game is physicality. In the Gwap games, the mixed
reality is labor. Their gameplay performs a kind of work that's hard for
computers but easy for humans. When players partake of the ESP Game, they perform the tagging of images directly and
simultaneously with every move in the game. Here, gameplay resembles the
performative act of christening a ship or a building.
That said, there is something "unhappy"
in Austin's
sense about Gwap's performative play: unlike World Without Oil or Pain
Station, it fails to reveal and contextualize the meaning of its actions.
Players may have some sense that the games contributes to image or music
tagging, but they do not understand the implications of such actions in the way
they understand promises and wagers when they perform such speech acts. This
defect raises ethical concerns as much as formal ones.
When a game performs an action without the
player's understanding of its implications, it confuses performativity and
exploitation. "I do" is a meaningful performative utterance because
bride, groom, and witnesses all fully understand its implications.
But the
possible implications of image tags, for example, as tools for surveillance as
much as for image searches, are not made obvious by the ESP Game. "Gwap" is an acronym for "Games with a
Purpose." But a purpose is not enough to describe performative play. A
context and a convention is also required.
The
Mundane
Ethical matters notwithstanding, exercise,
kindness, oil conservation, and metadata gathering are far more dramatic
actions than many things done though other media. Restroom signs and rear view
cameras are useful tools, but they are also mundane ones; people need to find
toilets and avoid tricycles. Performative play in games can address more
mundane activities like these as well.
Consider enterprise solutions start-up
Seriosity's product Attent. The
premise is this: we all get too much email, which reduces productivity. In
large organizations, much of this email is sent internally. The attention cost
of receiving email doesn't match that of sending it. Things just get worse as
the recipients become more senior, and therefore their time more valuable. Time
management isn't the answer; less email is. And one way to reduce the email
people receive is to make it more precious to send.
Attent tries to do exactly this, making
email more expensive to send, or at least making workers more deliberate about
how they do so. Since attention cost rises with seniority and expertise, email
can be recast as an attention game: the CEO's attention costs more than the
junior manager's, so the latter should have to "pay more" to get the
attention of the former. And likewise, a senior executive would take a request
from a junior one more seriously if the latter had to spend more of her scarce
attention capital to obtain it.
Attent
turns attention into capital, literally, via a scrip currency called Serios.
Workers can get Serios by accepting email with attached payments, or companies
can choose to dole it out in other ways as incentives or rewards. Attent works
as a plug-in for the popular corporate email client Microsoft Outlook, so it's
possible for workers to track their credits along with their calendar and even
to sort email by their value in Serios rather than by date.
|
Just look at the Exer-gaming sector, Edutainment, and amusement and attraction sectors move establishment immersive and physical game genres. I know its hard for consumer to talk about amusement. Remember the PainStation is now a coin-op release!
Thanks for an interesting article. Something you seem to be getting at towards the end of your article prompted a couple of ideas about gaming and narrative.
Actions you take in the real world impact your relationships with others. They can reveal (or engender) ethical stances, courage, and other character traits. It seems as though the freedom to experiment inherent in play is compromised somewhat in performative play, because of the potential real-world social consequences. Even assuming a play self that is largely anonymous in an online game, there is often opportunity for social feedback through game sites, etc.
Perhaps another sense of 'happiness' (completeness) in performative play might come from a perceived change in the character of the player. This seems to point toward delivering a (Holy Grail?) narrative experience through gameplay. The trick, I suppose, would be to appropriately scaffold the levels of choice, perceived rewards, and real-world risk.