Contents
The Gamasutra 20: 2008's Breakthrough Developers
 
 
Printer-Friendly VersionPrinter-Friendly Version
 
Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
February 9, 2010
 
Analysts: EA On The Right Track At Last
 
E3 2010 Registration Opens As Major Exhibitors Confirmed
 
Ubisoft Q3 Sales Edge Down, As It Ramps Up Big Franchises
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
February 9, 2010
 
Rockstar North
Senior Graphics Programmer
 
Flashpoint Academy
Game Development and Animation Teachers
 
Ubisoft San Francisco
Network Engineer
 
Telltale Games
Senior Game Designer
 
Irrational Games
Multiplayer Level Designer
 
Toys for Bob / Activision
Senior Producer (Temporary)
 
Gameloft
Low Poly 3D Modeling / Texture Artist
 
ROCKSTAR GAMES NYC
Gameplay Capture Artist
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
February 9, 2010
 
arrow Television, Meet Games
 
arrow Two Halves, Together: Patrick Gilmore On Double Helix [1]
 
arrow The Road To Hell: The Creative Direction of Dante's Inferno [20]
 
arrow The Sensible Side of Immersion [11]
 
arrow Jumpstarting Your Creativity [6]
 
arrow Truth in Game Design [49]
 
arrow Postmortem: Vicious Cycle's Matt Hazard: Blood Bath and Beyond [4]
 
arrow Developers React: The iPad's Future [16]
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
February 9, 2010
 
Fixing the GDC 2010 Schedule Builder
 
Lineage 2 Interview - 'Freya Update Is Just a Beginning' - Pt.2
 
Swashbuckling for Landlubbers: Why you may already be encouraging piracy! [19]
spacer
About
spacer News Director:
Leigh Alexander
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Editor At Large:
Chris Remo
Advertising:
John 'Malik' Watson
Recruitment/Education:
Gina Gross
 
Feature Submissions
Features
  The Gamasutra 20: 2008's Breakthrough Developers
by Dana Jongewaard
18 comments
Share RSS
 
 
August 13, 2008 Article Start Previous Page 21 of 21
 

Gamasutra 20 'Breakthrough' Honoree:

Wadjet Eye Games

http://www.wadjeteyegames.com/

Studio overview

Advertisement

Wadjet Eye Games develops adventure games and is headquartered in New York City. The company was officially founded in 2006; since then, it has released three games and was nominated for Best New Studio at the 2007 Game Developers Choice Awards.

Key staff

CEO Dave Gilbert began making adventure games using freeware tool Adventure Game Studio on his own time; after winning a competition with his entry The Shivah, he decided to sell the games online to a wider audience.

Resume highlights

While Wadjet Eye's old-school point-and-click, pixelated graphics are in some ways a throwback to the glory days of the LucasArts adventure games, the studio is also taking advantage of the more recent advances in the industry that have enabled small companies to self-fund their own development and publishing.

In addition to The Shivah, a game whose central character is a rabbi, the studio has also released The Blackwell Legacy and Blackwell Unbound; each of these games has had a development cycle of around three or four months.

This last February, PlayFirst announced that it had signed Wadjet Eye to a publishing deal for upcoming titles

What's next

Wadjet Eye is currently working on the next game in the Blackwell series, which is titled Blackwell Convergence.

Our take

"Perhaps Wadjet Eye would be one of the more unconventional picks on this Gamasutra 20. After all, it's a tiny company that makes PC adventure games, of all things. But there's a reason for this -- it mirrors the rise of formerly dormant genres through the growth of independent and casual games.

Seeing the Blackwell games being signed by the fairly major casual publisher PlayFirst shows the fact that the adventure genre is returning to the mainstream -- and that's exciting from many points of view, not least those of strong characterization and plotting.

Adventures have always been story-focused beyond many other games, and The Shivah and The Blackwell Legacy are just two of Wadjet Eye's titles that show beautifully tuned use of both."
- Simon Carless

 
Article Start Previous Page 21 of 21
 
Comments

Tim Carter
profile image
Who are the actual developers - the human beings - who are worth watching? Where's the detective work on this? We need to be interested in this game designer, that programmer or this artist far more than this or that company. Companies are just shells that own stuff. Games are made by people. Who are the people?

Tim Carter
profile image
From what I can tell the list reads something like this...

1.) Kyle Gabler
2.) Joseph M. Tringali, Jeremiah Slaczka
3.) Frank Lantz
4.) Katsura Hashino, Shigenori Soejima
5.) Tom Fulp, John Baez, Dan Paladin
6.) Max Hoberman
7.) Tim Schafer
8.) Goichi Suda
9.) Randy Pitchford
10.) Vlad Ceraldi, Joel DeYoung, Ron Gilbert
11.) Steve Fawkner
12.) Akihiro Hino
13.) Mark Healey, Alex Evans
14.) Mare Sheppard, Raigan Burns
15.) Shinji Mikami, Atsushi Inaba
16.) Dylan Cuthbert, Kenkichi Shimooka
17.) Jenova Chen, Kellee Santiago
18.) Masato Maegawa
19.) Michael Booth
20.) Dave Gilbert

Chris Remo
profile image
In most cases, games are also made by a lot of people, not just a few. I'm not sure, Mr. Gamemaster, what you would have had us do, considering as you seem to be aware, we do list key personnel--at the end of the day, these companies' games are still made by a lot more people than the few individuals we list, and we're looking to highlight the collective efforts of all of them, because there is no practical way we could have possibly distilled the proportional amount of creative contribution every individual developer made on these games, so we could better highlight this game designer, that programmer, or this artist.

Tim Carter
profile image
True.

Also, a football team is made up of a lot of people - however, that doesn't stop us from learning and talking about star players like Bret Favre, Joe Montana, etc.

Also, a film is made by many people - however, that doesn't stop us learning about key creators like William Golding, Steven Spielberg, Francois Truffaut, Roman Polanski, etc.

Also, many people are needed to construct a building - however that doesn't stop us giving recognition to key designers like Frank Lloyd Wright, Daniel Libskind, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, etc.

(Shall I continue...?)

There is no excuse for the game industry to obstinately refuse to acknowledge and celebrate the talent of those individuals who have exceptional talent.

brandon sheffield
profile image
ah, grassroots gamemaster. I feel you are accusing Gamasutra of an industry-wide problem, one which we're actually attempting to address directly. We can only know who we know, and we put them in the articles where possible. We can't go in to these studios and evaluate their skills and find that hidden gem. Nobody will pay us to do that. It's the responsibility of two parties, the companies themselves, and the persons themselves. And to be frank, we know way more game creators now than we ever did, and I think lists like these, and extensive interviews with key people in these studios are part of that.

I'm...not sure what you want!
I sure am making a post on the internet. Hi mom!

Stone Bytes
profile image
You can still watch the Will Wright minute. *sigh*

Besides, I didn't know posts could be edited. Where's the button?

Shane Stevens
profile image
-quote-
We can't go in to these studios and evaluate their skills and find that hidden gem. Nobody will pay us to do that. It's the responsibility of two parties, the companies themselves, and the persons themselves.
-end quote-

There IS a completely logical and near-effortless alternative: contacting the developers before these articles are written and polling them directly for key personnel on their staff. For instance, some noteworthy people who work/have worked with Dave Gilbert are Peter Gresser (Lead Musician), Ian Schlaepfer (Lead Artist for Blackwell Legacy/ Portrait Artist for Blackwell Convergence), Erin Robinson (Lead Artist for Blackwell Unbound), and myself (sprites/animations for The Shivah and Lead Artist for Blackwell Convergence).

I'm sure a quick email could've gotten you all this and more, though! :)

Simon Carless
profile image
Fair comment, Shane. We did, obviously, do research on the individuals at companies, but we'd love other commenters to highlight further folks at those firms who deserve kudos. That's what feedback is useful for.

Charles Joseph Pratt
profile image
Look, everyone wants credit for the hard work that they've done, but this is a strange battle to pick, Grassroots. I mean, these are clearly quick little write-ups and mentioning more than one person would not only be impractical, but a little overboard. Frankly, it's nice to see some of these companies, like area/code or Wadjet Eye, get this exposure at all. Do you have a beef with Gamasutra or do you rail over on sites like 1up.com or GameSpot as well? Seems those places might be more deserving of your wrath.

Gregory Peng
profile image
Truth be told, I still don't have a clue as to what "breakthrough" means. Considering there is at least an ongoing dialogue for the definition of "indie", in comparison this list seems to be formed without a real sense of context or direction.

Anonymous
profile image
Quote:
"with Activision apparently opting not to publish the title after acquiring Vivendi Games. "

Err... Sorry????

It's Vivendi who aquired Activision & merged it with Vivendi Games. Yes it's true that the Activision board now lead the game branch of Vivendi but still.. Vivendi IS THE BOSS.
Vivendi holds 54% of Activision Blizzard, so I'm not sure you can tell that Activision aquired anything..


Anonymous
profile image
@Grassroots Gamemaster:

Citing other industries and media is no excuse. I find it just as bad in the film industry that the talent of a whole team and the culture of the company that team resides in (which contributes hugely to how a game is produced) is neglected in favor of single-person worship/stardom.

So, I think that naming the companies AND some of the names of the leads there is appropiate.

Just naming the few leads - like you suggest - is just not enough.

Chris Remo
profile image
Anonymous:

No, Vivendi Games is indeed now a subsidiary of Activision. Also, Vivendi (the parent company, not Games) owns a controlling interest in Activision.

Tim Carter
profile image
Anonymous at 10:05, 14 Aug...

Excuse for what? For standing up for the contributions of key creators?

Like it or not, experience and hundreds of years of history show that key talented people - leaders, shapers - make a difference far out of proportion to their singular number. You can argue against this, but you do so in the face of a vast amount of evidence.

If you have a team of 100, you can pull someone at random and the creative output probably won't change - but if you pull a leader, a shaper, then suddenly the quality and quantity of that output falls a full magnitude.

But what's more - recognition of the effort AND talent of individuals is fundamental to progress out of the dark ages of collectivist tribalism into the enlightenment of self-awareness and humanistic accomplishment.

When faced with real talent, humans generally skew along three trends. They actively suppress it (the old "barrel of monkeys pulling down anyone who rises"); they tolerate it, and let it be "part of the team"; or they openly celebrate it and actively search for and fund it (and that means rewarding it).

I am arguing for the latter.

Stone Bytes
profile image
"I am arguing for the latter." ... which would mainly come through the appraisal of leaders and their vision, which a team would be less suited for. Erecting kings, that's more the business of the PR and marketing departments, and the reviewers/consumers who would likely focus on the people at the helm of a project.
This, however, already happens. Maybe not enough though.

John Lockwood
profile image
I was going to suggest starting a game version of IMDB.com.
someone started http://www.internetgamedatabase.com/ but it has no content yet...

Rikard Peterson
profile image
@ John Lockwood: Try http://www.mobygames.com

Harold Pichol
profile image
I can't believe how Grassroots Gamemaster is alone on this one! I know the companies, Gamasutra is for game dev people, I'm a game dev dude and all those companies are well known if you have rss enabled and some good feeds.

What is wrong to actually SHOW some people, see the people who make consumers and gamers enjoy and have good time for HOURS. Show the people we want to cherish, copy and celebrate.

Claiming it's unfair for the ones who are not on the picture is pure BS and so lame. If they work on a project they love next time they will, and next time they will demand to appear on the "collective shot for Gamasutra, the gamedev industry bible".

It's all about making change! We're not made in the stone.

I love to see the face of Introversion guys, or have a big picture of Ken Levine or Will Wright or Jon Blow speaking on a video stream... Watching Raph Koster playing guitar and all,

Of course you can be a big fat nerdy gamedev and so what, making efforts like Gabe Newell (he did lose weight and it was not to use Outlook) isn't bad for you.

And it's certainly good for us, gamedev people. Step up and exist!


none
 
Comment:
 


Submit Comment