Contents
Postmortem: Brothers in Arms: Double Time
 
 
Printer-Friendly VersionPrinter-Friendly Version
 
Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
Video Game Watchdog National Institute On Media And The Family Shutting Down [11]
 
Modern Warfare 2 Infinity Ward's 'Most Successful PC Version' Yet [12]
 
New Tech, Design Details Of Project Natal To Emerge At Gamefest In February
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Character Artist
 
Sucker Punch Productions
3D Environment Artist
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Network Programmer
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Texture Artist
 
Sony Online Entertainment
Brand Manager
 
Monolith Productions
Sr. Software Engineer, Engine - Monolith Productions - #113767
 
Crystal Dynamics
Sr. Level Designer
 
Gargantuan Studios
Lead World Designer
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
arrow Upping The Craft: Susan O'Connor On Games Writing [6]
 
arrow Small Developers: Minimizing Risks in Large Productions - Part II [6]
 
arrow iPhone Piracy: The Inside Story [48]
 
arrow And Yet It Grows: Analyzing the Size and Growth of the European Game Market [5]
 
arrow NPD: Behind the Numbers, October 2009 [13]
 
arrow Reflecting On Uncharted 2: How They Did It [5]
 
arrow Sponsored Feature: Rasterization on Larrabee -- Adaptive Rasterization Helps Boost Efficiency
 
arrow Postmortem: Wadjet Eye's The Blackwell Convergence [2]
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
Accepting the Inherent Value of Games
 
Planckogenesis, Part II: Song Structure & Gravy Train [1]
 
Designing Games Is About Matching Personalities [1]
spacer
About
spacer News Director:
Leigh Alexander
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Editor At Large:
Chris Remo
Advertising:
John 'Malik' Watson
Recruitment/Education:
Gina Gross
 
Features
  Postmortem: Brothers in Arms: Double Time
by Kristin Price, Kurt Reiner
2 comments
Share RSS
 
 
September 30, 2008 Article Start Previous Page 2 of 4 Next
 

3. Created reusable Wii technology.

At the beginning of development, we identified the creation of reusable Wii technology as a long-term engineering goal of this project -- but we wanted to do so while still emphasizing the need to deliver a high quality Brothers in Arms experience for the player. Beyond the typical issues that arise from developing for a new platform, early in the development cycle we identified optimization as a major challenge in creating an engine with flexibility enough for a variety of game types.

Advertisement

Our goal was to ensure that not only would Brothers in Arms run well and look good, but any future projects that used our engine would not need to spend significant amounts of time on optimization.

By emphasizing the long-term goal of reusability and the short term goal of shipping a high quality product from the outset, we were able to focus our efforts in the right places. The result was an engine that delivers a visually compelling Wii title with technology flexible enough to be used by Demiurge in future Wii projects.

4. Scrum and constant planning saved time.

During development for Brothers in Arms: Double Time, the project management methodology of Scrum and Agile Development was beginning to take hold of the game industry. After researching it internally, we elected to give it a small trial run.

We began using Scrum toward the end of the project to systematically tackle the close-out of the project rather than solely in the development cycle. Members of the team would take on classes of bugs during a sprint. The goal was to have each system online and bug-free at the end of the sprint. This, coupled with a strong engineering team, allowed us to complete the project without crunching. 

Since working with the Wii involved a lot of new technology challenges, we planned hard from the start of the project through zero-bugs, revising and planning even more aggressively as we entered the bug fixing and optimization periods of the project. At the end of the project, we posted a large bug fix chart that constantly reflected how we were closing down.

This kept everyone on the team aware of how we were tracking toward our goal and instilled some competition for how quickly we could optimize and fix issues. We also began tracking data as to how the team was progressing so that in future projects, the pre-production planning could be robust from the get-go.

We found Scrum to be very successful in allowing us to "plan" initial bug-fixing so that we had achievable goals that were within our timeline and owned by the team. It also allowed us to adequately think out all the problems before digging in and tackling them one by one. We've since used the Scrum methodology for all of our projects with increasing success. 

5. Support and resources from Nintendo of America.

Double Time was the first Wii title to be developed at Demiurge Studios, so there was some ramp up time to get familiar with the platform. We were working on this title long enough and early enough in the platform lifecycle to see an evolution in the SDK, the profiling tools, and the lot check requirements.

In short, the learning never stopped. While Nintendo cannot do the work for you, we found the documentation and web resources very helpful. In particular, the newsgroups are an excellent source of knowledge. Someone somewhere has had the same problem you're having and they've asked about it on the newsgroup.

The response time to questions from Nintendo of America was usually within an hour or so. It seemed as though the family friendliness of the Wii console also existed in the developer support arena.

 
Article Start Previous Page 2 of 4 Next
 
Comments

Janne Haffer
profile image
Interesting article but I have some questions:
I haven't played the game so I don't know the scope, but only 15 people at peak with a 13 month dev time which includes building new tech looks like it would be quite tight, especially if they ramped down too early like mentioned?

The article also says the game was released in september 08 while there is a part where it says "...we started the project in late 2006..." more than half a year seems like a long time to get to the stores after going gold. Are the numbers here correct?

Anyways it looks like quite impressive and cool for a wii game!

Kurt Reiner
profile image
Hiya Janne,
The headcounts and timelines are correct. It was a strong group of experienced engineers. The game was finished and then held for release closer to the holiday season.
Cheers,
-Kurt


none
 
Comment:
 


Submit Comment