Contents
Video Game Regulation: Where We Are Now
 
 
Printer-Friendly VersionPrinter-Friendly Version
 
Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
Video Game Watchdog National Institute On Media And The Family Shutting Down [11]
 
Modern Warfare 2 Infinity Ward's 'Most Successful PC Version' Yet [12]
 
New Tech, Design Details Of Project Natal To Emerge At Gamefest In February
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
Trion Redwood City
Sr. Environment Artist
 
Trion Redwood City
Sr. Evnironment Modeler
 
Sucker Punch Productions
3D Environment Artist
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Network Programmer
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Texture Artist
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Character Artist
 
Crystal Dynamics
Sr. Level Designer
 
Monolith Productions
Sr. Software Engineer, Engine - Monolith Productions - #113767
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
arrow Upping The Craft: Susan O'Connor On Games Writing [6]
 
arrow Small Developers: Minimizing Risks in Large Productions - Part II [7]
 
arrow iPhone Piracy: The Inside Story [49]
 
arrow And Yet It Grows: Analyzing the Size and Growth of the European Game Market [5]
 
arrow NPD: Behind the Numbers, October 2009 [13]
 
arrow Reflecting On Uncharted 2: How They Did It [5]
 
arrow Sponsored Feature: Rasterization on Larrabee -- Adaptive Rasterization Helps Boost Efficiency
 
arrow Postmortem: Wadjet Eye's The Blackwell Convergence [2]
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
Time Fcuk [1]
 
Accepting the Inherent Value of Games
 
Planckogenesis, Part II: Song Structure & Gravy Train [1]
spacer
About
spacer News Director:
Leigh Alexander
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Editor At Large:
Chris Remo
Advertising:
John 'Malik' Watson
Recruitment/Education:
Gina Gross
 
Features
  Video Game Regulation: Where We Are Now
by Neils Clark
12 comments
Share RSS
 
 
January 20, 2009 Article Start Previous Page 3 of 5 Next
 

The Asian economic crisis changed the way the Korean government approached games. In part, Bangs -- PC gaming rooms -- grew in popularity among the droves of newly laid-off workers because during the crisis they provided a livable income. Some of the reasoning behind that, however, was that the government was providing subsidies to new Bang owners.

Between around 1997 and 2002, subsidies for broadband Internet access made owning a Bang one of the most financially attractive forms of self-employment.

Advertisement

The results are evident on every street in South Korea: the Bang exploded. Bangs, in turn, were an important contributor for leading Korea from the economic crisis in the late nineties.

While there's a certain awareness and respect for the cultural and economic importance of the gaming sector, that same culture creates other unique regulatory concerns.

As online gaming continues to grow, it has rekindled worries over gaming's potential negative effects.

In the early 2000s, the media began giving an immense amount of publicity to the deaths of young South Korean gamers.

Among other sweeping cultural changes, South Korea's Office of the Prime Minister and Policy agency set up four commissions to explore the phenomena of "Internet Addiction."

While the Korean government can now boast one of the most culturally informed and balanced measures for understanding the health effects of gaming, the K-scale, at present there's new pressure from parents and Korean experts to regulate minors.

Parents are actually calling on the government for the power to "abolish" online gaming accounts for their children under the age of 18. Huhh sees the generational gap between frustrated parents and players as just one side of the issue in South Korea.

"More profoundly," he says, "In Korea, you can find a place for online gaming anywhere."

Even savvy and involved parents can find it impossible to control their children's usage. In Seoul there's at least one PC room on every street -- oftentimes many more. Huhh says that right now, officials are considering different ways of limiting children's play.

Makers of the Korean arcade-style MMO game Dungeon & Fighter have actually imposed limits on how much monster killing, any single player can undertake in a single day.

When asked if the 100-minute-per-day limit hurt the game's image, Huhh remarked, "Ironically, this policy contributes to the popularity."

Other issues are not so well received.

China, while the biggest overseas market for the Korean industry, is a hotbed when it comes to IP issues. Some of the most popular Korean games, Lineage, Mu, Ragnarok, Kart Rider and Audition, are being hacked and set up illegally in China.

While piracy, royalty payments and private servers are hot issues between the two countries, the regulation of gold farming is taking unique turns.

What's interesting about the Korean take on gold farming isn't that some are for or against it, but that groups are lobbying the Korean government.

While in countries like China, the majority of the legislating and enforcement comes from the top, countries like Korea sport a sophisticated and policy-minded gamer public.

"In South Korea you have a more politically aware gamer than in the states," says Joshua Fairfield. "Gamers in the U.S. are gamers second. They're usually something else first... You don't hear about pro-gamer legislation."

 
Article Start Previous Page 3 of 5 Next
 
Comments

Bill Redd
profile image
WARNING: This comment is rated PG-13. Strong Lanquage.

"The sour faces shouldn't be too surprising when politicians say things like, "I want to restore values so children are protected from a societal cesspool of filth, pornography, violence, sex and perversion," (Mitt Romney-R). "

Of course, once again on this site, it is a Republican who gets to be the bad guy. One quick google search reveals many more enemies to choose from:

Hillary Clinton (D)
Joe Lieberman (D-IN)
Tipper Gore (D)
former Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D)
Sen. Juan Hinojosa (D)
Sen. Evah Bayh (D)
Sen. Jon Erpenbach (D)
Jan Schakowsky (D)
Assemblyman Tem Leland Yee (D)
Miami attorney Jack Thompson (D)
Roy Burrell (D) LA
Assemblyman Keith L.T. Wright (D)
Rep. Jeff Harris of Columbia (D)
Rep. Mary Lou Dickerson (D)
Rep. Joe McDermott (D)
Justin Ross (D)
Sen. Vi Simpson (D)

ALL have proposed bills, or made comments against the video game industry. But your selection, whether intentional or not, surely will leave some un-informed or perhaps younger readers with a bad taste for republicans. "Damn church freak Romney doesn't want me to play my games..."

Dude, I'm a Republican (no $H!T you say) and an atheist, and I don't care what letter comes after the name, I do not want my life or choices limited by a politician in any facet.

Personally I think all forms of entertainment: TV, movies, books, magazines, games, websites etc... Should have a content rating similiar to movies or TV.

Let the buyer beware, then let him buy it!

Otherwise, great article!

Stevan Zivadinovic
profile image
If Lieberman and Jack Thompson are Democrats I am a platonic solid. The convenience of latching onto a Republican when talking about these kinds of issues stems from the fact that Republicans like to monopolize morality and morals as something only they are able to posses.

Jason King
profile image
Some say the difference between a Republican politician and a Democrat politician is that the Republican feels bad when they are being hypocritical.

Bill Redd
profile image
@Stevan Zivadinovic
Lieberman was a democrat until recently and Jack Thompson is a wacko christian activist, I should NOT have put a (D) by his name. My (big) mistake. Which platonic solid would you be anyway?

I guess you can only monopolize morals if you talk about them and they have meaning to you. But you saying that proves my point. I would not say what Romney said, however I'm lumped into that stereotype, and he is put forth in this article as an example of the enemy and frankly I'm tired of being lumped in. I'm sick of every writer for every website using Republicans as the bad guy when they could just as easily find a Democrat that has done or said the same things.

The point is, video games and game content are under assault by the government. By BOTH sides of the isle. I think the industry should act quickly before they are acted upon.

@Jason King
True, the Democrat would'nt give a $h!t at all.

Andre Thomas
profile image
If you were to ask me personally, it would be stupid and unconstitutional for the government to regulate the game video games buisness because its nothing but the government trying to trample on our civil liberties and individual rights.

Anyhow as somebody who feels that there are certain types of games minors definitely should not be playing, I personally believe that the games industry is capable of regulating itself as it have demonstrated before rather than government pushing legistlation in areas it has no business in.

In the end its a shame we no longer have a "limited government" as advocated in the preamble of our constitution, but a government that seek to amass more power in anyway possible. The role of government is protect civil liberties, not trample on them.

Brian Bartram
profile image
(attempting to redirect the partisan flame war back to the issue at hand...)
The point continually brought up in these court cases is that there already exists sufficient technology, provided by the industry, to monitor and lock out undesirable content. Parents simply are too lazy to use learn to use them. These tools are actually far more effective than the "fear my litigation stick" approach of law and enforcement.
And this will always be the case - technology moves far faster than legislation. We, as an industry, should always make it a point to beat the law makers to the solution and implement it before they can even finish selecting their jurors.
What we need is a voicebox powerful enough to confront these muckrakers. Somebody with charisma to be the voice of reason.

I need a hero. I'm holding out for a hero 'til the morning light.

Joshua Milewski
profile image
I find it unconstitutional for the US government to regulate video games *at all*, and in general, video game regulation is just plain bad.

Regulation of art, censorship, is a blatant violation of freedom, and I will fight to protect that freedom.

Joshua Milewski
profile image
By the way, are mod chips really illegal in the US under the DMCA, as I read at the following link?

http://www.gamepolitics.com/2008/11/24/feds039-mod-chip-raid-ended-25-million-pi
racy-operation

Christian Philippe Guay
profile image
Regulation or mass control?
Better stop stupidity...

When people will stop hidding themselves behind video games for their bad, sexual or violent actions; regulations will stop.

If we, as humans, live to experience life... the consequences are only up to us... and without the experience, people will stay ignorant. I especially like the quote from Hideo Kojima on ''Everything we experience with our own eyes makes us better judges'' - or very close to that...

Anyway, USA presidents since '50- '60 come from Harvard and Skull & Bones... no big secret actually.

Carol Mullins
profile image
Josh - from what I understand: the DMCA makes it illegal to subvert copy protection, and Grokster v. MGM basically held that something distributed for the primary purpose of infringing on copyright can be found to contributorily infringe. So, depending on the status of mod chips, use of mod chips could easily be interpreted as attempts to subvert copy protection under the DMCA and as contributory infringement under Grokster. It might take an extension of Grokster to declare that mere possession of mod chips amounted to a DMCA violation, but it's not necessarily an unreasonable leap.

Andre Thomas
profile image
"What we need is a voicebox powerful enough to confront these muckrakers. Somebody with charisma to be the voice of reason."

Ron Paul? At least he seem to be the only person in DC that actually things that the government has no business in the personal affairs of the common man


Bob McIntyre
profile image
Haha Ron Paul oh man. Classic! But no, we should probably pick someone who isn't recognized as a lunatic by the general public. He would've been a hilarious counterweight for Jack Thompson back when the two of them were relevant, though.


none
 
Comment:
 


Submit Comment