|
Though politically aware gamers around the world have always
held an important sway on regulatory issues, this last U.S. election proved
Fairfield right.
However American gamers might have identified themselves
politically in this last election, some of the strongest critics to the
industry won reelection to the House and Senate handily. Issues like abortion,
the war in Iraq and gay marriage still trump the gaming hobby. Go figure.
In the United States, most of the lobbying and legislation
has favored the American Intellectual Property industry.
"The IP war is just as big as the drug war," says
Fairfield. "Right now we have cabinet-level positions for fighting IP
piracy... There's nothing strange about that. Entertainment industries get to
lobby congress, but we shouldn't be surprised when they get what they
want."
"The IP issue is definitely going to be a huge
battleground, ultimately more significant than the content legislation,"
says Dennis McCauley. "While I think consumers and video game industry are
on the same side on the content -- they're probably not on the same side on all
aspects of IP protection."
There are some obvious examples, as with gamer reaction to
the SecuRom DRM embedded in Electronic Arts products, including the Spore
Creature Creator and The Sims 2. After the thousands-strong public
outcry over EA's inclusion of the SecuRom DRM, other publishers using SecuRom
and similar services have all but tiptoed around the issue.
"PC games seem to cause a lot of anxiety on the part of
publishers for what they see as piracy," says McCauley. "It's
concerning for those of us that enjoy PC games. You almost get the impression
publishers are either trying to drive everyone to consoles -- where they have
control -- or some subscription model. I certainly don't condone piracy. I
don't think that responsible people do."
But he wonders at the lines the industry will ultimately
draw as a whole.
"I was really concerned with how the industry was
handling piracy in the summer of 2007, when the industry, the ESA, conducted an
operation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)... and raided 32
people in 16 states looking for mod chips. Yes, mod chips have applications for
piracy, but possibly also for homebrew gaming. It seems heavy handed to me to
have federal agents kicking down doors over mod chips."
He continues, emphasizing that though the ESA gave these busts
a lot of publicity at the time, none of the defendants are giving any details.
"What's fascinating is that we're more than a year
beyond that and all of those cases are still sealed in federal court... This is
America, what's going on here? You kick down 32 doors over mod chips more than
a year ago and it's still a big secret?"
There are other places where standard protections offered
American citizens are taking turns that are legally both troubling and
troublesome.
At present, MMO game and virtual world publishers can be
subpoenaed for all types of information through the Stored Communications Act
and the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act. Getting those
subpoenas sometimes doesn't even require law enforcement to meet standards for
probable cause under the fourth amendment.
Joshua Fairfield says, "If you think about what the
government has to do in order to set up a wire tap on your phone, they have to
jump through some fairly restrictive hoops. Now they don't have to do that. They
can just let the game god do that, then [under the Stored Communications Act]
send them a subpoena... They send a letter to Blizzard, 'Everything this person
has said, just hand it over.' I think that's pretty darned disturbing."
Fairfield also points out combinations of laws, which, when
put together make for strange outcomes. The biggest of these, for video games,
is the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
In short, gaining unauthorized access to
someone's computer and doing $500 in damages opens you up for criminal charges.
It's good for prosecuting hackers, but it makes for a strange fit with social
networking websites and user-generated content.
That fit was especially strange when prosecutors weren't
quite sure how to approach the widely publicized case of Meghan Meier. The
13-year-old Meier committed suicide after being deceived and bullied by another
girl and her mother, Lori Drew.
Unable to find a good way to approach the
issue, prosecutors charged Drew under MySpace's End User License Agreement, effectively
giving MySpace the power to dictate criminal law.
"There are a number of other combos that mean we're
beginning to see in-game EULAs being given the force of government regulation
and criminal law," says Fairfield. "That kind of claim: that there
can be criminal sanctions for violating the EULA I think is something
completely new and really, really scary."
|
"The sour faces shouldn't be too surprising when politicians say things like, "I want to restore values so children are protected from a societal cesspool of filth, pornography, violence, sex and perversion," (Mitt Romney-R). "
Of course, once again on this site, it is a Republican who gets to be the bad guy. One quick google search reveals many more enemies to choose from:
Hillary Clinton (D)
Joe Lieberman (D-IN)
Tipper Gore (D)
former Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D)
Sen. Juan Hinojosa (D)
Sen. Evah Bayh (D)
Sen. Jon Erpenbach (D)
Jan Schakowsky (D)
Assemblyman Tem Leland Yee (D)
Miami attorney Jack Thompson (D)
Roy Burrell (D) LA
Assemblyman Keith L.T. Wright (D)
Rep. Jeff Harris of Columbia (D)
Rep. Mary Lou Dickerson (D)
Rep. Joe McDermott (D)
Justin Ross (D)
Sen. Vi Simpson (D)
ALL have proposed bills, or made comments against the video game industry. But your selection, whether intentional or not, surely will leave some un-informed or perhaps younger readers with a bad taste for republicans. "Damn church freak Romney doesn't want me to play my games..."
Dude, I'm a Republican (no $H!T you say) and an atheist, and I don't care what letter comes after the name, I do not want my life or choices limited by a politician in any facet.
Personally I think all forms of entertainment: TV, movies, books, magazines, games, websites etc... Should have a content rating similiar to movies or TV.
Let the buyer beware, then let him buy it!
Otherwise, great article!
Lieberman was a democrat until recently and Jack Thompson is a wacko christian activist, I should NOT have put a (D) by his name. My (big) mistake. Which platonic solid would you be anyway?
I guess you can only monopolize morals if you talk about them and they have meaning to you. But you saying that proves my point. I would not say what Romney said, however I'm lumped into that stereotype, and he is put forth in this article as an example of the enemy and frankly I'm tired of being lumped in. I'm sick of every writer for every website using Republicans as the bad guy when they could just as easily find a Democrat that has done or said the same things.
The point is, video games and game content are under assault by the government. By BOTH sides of the isle. I think the industry should act quickly before they are acted upon.
@Jason King
True, the Democrat would'nt give a $h!t at all.
Anyhow as somebody who feels that there are certain types of games minors definitely should not be playing, I personally believe that the games industry is capable of regulating itself as it have demonstrated before rather than government pushing legistlation in areas it has no business in.
In the end its a shame we no longer have a "limited government" as advocated in the preamble of our constitution, but a government that seek to amass more power in anyway possible. The role of government is protect civil liberties, not trample on them.
The point continually brought up in these court cases is that there already exists sufficient technology, provided by the industry, to monitor and lock out undesirable content. Parents simply are too lazy to use learn to use them. These tools are actually far more effective than the "fear my litigation stick" approach of law and enforcement.
And this will always be the case - technology moves far faster than legislation. We, as an industry, should always make it a point to beat the law makers to the solution and implement it before they can even finish selecting their jurors.
What we need is a voicebox powerful enough to confront these muckrakers. Somebody with charisma to be the voice of reason.
I need a hero. I'm holding out for a hero 'til the morning light.
Regulation of art, censorship, is a blatant violation of freedom, and I will fight to protect that freedom.
http://www.gamepolitics.com/2008/11/24/feds039-mod-chip-raid-ended-25-million-pi
racy-operation
Better stop stupidity...
When people will stop hidding themselves behind video games for their bad, sexual or violent actions; regulations will stop.
If we, as humans, live to experience life... the consequences are only up to us... and without the experience, people will stay ignorant. I especially like the quote from Hideo Kojima on ''Everything we experience with our own eyes makes us better judges'' - or very close to that...
Anyway, USA presidents since '50- '60 come from Harvard and Skull & Bones... no big secret actually.
Ron Paul? At least he seem to be the only person in DC that actually things that the government has no business in the personal affairs of the common man