Contents
Design Language: Design by Darwin
 
 
Printer-Friendly VersionPrinter-Friendly Version
 
Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
Video Game Watchdog National Institute On Media And The Family Shutting Down [11]
 
Modern Warfare 2 Infinity Ward's 'Most Successful PC Version' Yet [14]
 
New Tech, Design Details Of Project Natal To Emerge At Gamefest In February
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
Trion Redwood City
Sr. Environment Artist
 
Trion Redwood City
Sr. Evnironment Modeler
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Network Programmer
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Texture Artist
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Character Artist
 
Sucker Punch Productions
3D Environment Artist
 
Crystal Dynamics
Sr. Level Designer
 
Sony Online Entertainment
Brand Manager
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
arrow Upping The Craft: Susan O'Connor On Games Writing [6]
 
arrow Small Developers: Minimizing Risks in Large Productions - Part II [7]
 
arrow iPhone Piracy: The Inside Story [51]
 
arrow And Yet It Grows: Analyzing the Size and Growth of the European Game Market [5]
 
arrow NPD: Behind the Numbers, October 2009 [13]
 
arrow Reflecting On Uncharted 2: How They Did It [5]
 
arrow Sponsored Feature: Rasterization on Larrabee -- Adaptive Rasterization Helps Boost Efficiency
 
arrow Postmortem: Wadjet Eye's The Blackwell Convergence [2]
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
Managing Creativity
 
Time Fcuk - A Postmortem [3]
 
Accepting the Inherent Value of Games
spacer
About
spacer News Director:
Leigh Alexander
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Editor At Large:
Chris Remo
Advertising:
John 'Malik' Watson
Recruitment/Education:
Gina Gross
 
Features
  Design Language: Design by Darwin
by Noah Falstein
10 comments
Share RSS
 
 
February 12, 2009 Article Start Previous Page 3 of 3
 

The Meme Meme

Darwin's thinking has gone well beyond his original imagination. In Richard Dawkins' book The Selfish Gene he coined the term "meme" to mean a unit or element of cultural ideas and practices, transmitted from one mind to another, much like genes are transmitted from one generation to another.

For example, the very concept of a meme is a meme -- and I have just transmitted it into your mind. If this is the first time you are hearing of it, it has reproduced, and if you find it interesting enough to repeat to someone else it may thrive and expand more.

Advertisement

A game mechanism, like the idea of having multiple lives that are expended in a game and earned through scoring points, is a meme that was established early in the arcade game industry and spread widely from one game to another, with modifications over time. This sort of co-opting of evolution by analogy is rampant throughout the games industry.

It may seem forced to speak of game mechanisms evolving when they are in fact appropriated by other designers swapping (or stealing!) ideas and not truly living and reproducing on their own. But it turns out that some forms of bacteria swap genes with each other in a phenomenon called "horizontal gene transfer".

Often the natural world is more complex and surprising than we realize. And if game design is more like the process of intentional genetic engineering than like natural selection, it still owes a lot to Darwin.

The Origin of Genres

Another example of his contribution is the way we look at game genres that I have been referring to throughout this article. In many ways a game genre is like a biological class or order of living things. Just as people are of the order of primates, within the class of mammals, an MMORPG is an order of the larger class of RPG.

Of course this is only an analogy, but a surprisingly apt one. We often refer to a genre that has fallen out of favor as a "dinosaur", or talk about how the modern concept of first-person shooters is "evolving" to include more sophisticated storytelling.

Certainly games compete on the open market, and something very like evolution happens based on their ability to succeed financially -- and "reproduce" by spawning sequels or imitations. In a similar way, game consoles are said to evolve, adding features, competing with each other.

It's more than just an interesting analogy, since it is possible to use an understanding of the principles of evolution to consider how to make a particular game more viable and competitive in the economic environment.

For instance, the current members of this generation of consoles each have to adapt to the fast-growing demand for inexpensive downloadable content, and the sudden rise in popularity of casual games of many types.

The one slowest to respond, or inefficient at using the new delivery systems will likely "die off" in the next generation of game systems. Of course consoles are not living things, but are built by companies -- but companies also exist in a fast-evolving Darwinian landscape of competition.

I have only touched on a few ways that Darwin's thinking has influenced our industry and game design in particular.

But in doing so I may have planted a meme in your brain that, in time, will evolve into a whole new game mechanism -- or perhaps a new game genre. Happy Birthday, Charlie!

 
Article Start Previous Page 3 of 3
 
Comments

Jonathon Walsh
profile image
An interesting read and I enjoyed the article but I'm really disappointed. I was fully expecting to see one of my favorite games mentioned (the one that taught me about evolution in fact).

That game is of course E.V.O ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E.V.O ).

Joshua Dallman
profile image
I too was surprised to not see E.V.O. up there especially since it is a classic game that's been out forever.

Also relevant to the discussion is indie game Venture Africa which features autonomous AI animals and indirectly teaches about natural selection through its gameplay. Developer Pocketwatch Games did an excellent job at blurring the lines between education and entertainment with the title and received several complaints from religious intelligent design types about the game even though there is no overt messaging within it.

juice uk
profile image
Interesting article, though I don't know if Darwin has had as much of an impact as indicated. The idea of "levelling up" is more likely to have been modelled on martial arts or industry: the idea of working towards a given level of certification has been around long before Darwin!

It's also worth noting that (un)Intelligent Design is far more popular than evolution: from Syndicate to The Sims, the emphasis is generally on the player choosing the path of the gameplay, story and in-game behaviour. There's a good reason for this: evolution is by nature random, which makes it hard to debug or finetune. Black and White is one example of a game which promised a lot from the concept of AI, but ended up being heavily toned down thanks to the unpredictability.

Something more interesting would be to look at the way games themselves have evolved: from Space Panic through to Super Mario Galaxy, 3D Monster Maze to Half Life 2: there's a clear path of evolution, complete with high levels of cross-fertilisation and mutation. Only the strongest genes survive into the next generation, and the cycle then begins anew...

Daniel Kromand
profile image
I think it is interesting that this piece only looks at the notion "survival of the fittest" without expanding on Darwin's own idea of sexual selection among humans. I don't know how it fits into the history of game design, but Darwin argued that human relations are based on altruism and sympathy rather than the feral competition of the natural world.

Tom Newman
profile image
Great great article!!! There are endless parallels between evolution and game design, and it's refreshing to see this insight.

Joseph Vasquez II
profile image
"In many ways a game genre is like a biological class or order of living things. Just as people are of the order of primates, within the class of mammals, an MMORPG is an order of the larger class of RPG."

In many ways a plant type is like a class of car. Just as Ford Mustangs are of the order of sports car sedan, within the class of automobile, a potato is of the order of tuber, of the larger class of plant.
I

Joseph Vasquez II
profile image
When parallels as contrived as these are used with other topics, we label the article as "silly fanboyism." I read gamasutra everyday instead of joystiq in order to avoid such things.

Robert Zamber
profile image
I agree... "silly fanboyism". Darwin's ideas are really not all that original, nor progressive by any means. Conversely, In many cultures (outside the US of course) Darwin's "theories" (not truth); ironically, are considered crude, and primitive. Its dangerous for any culture, or individual for that matter, to accept a collection of such illusory, half-baked thoughts and ideas as some kind of cornerstone for truth; to build ones collective (or individual) identity. If we want to evolve this industry into something of substance, we should probably avoid Darwin altogether. The Egyptians had ideas about evolution loooooooooooong before "Darwin". We all evolved from Black people, i.e. "Kemet"! Try "Isis Papers".

Michael Gesner
profile image
This article draws an interesting parallel, however I'm surprised Noah did not reference the more direct influence of Darwin in the use of genetic algorithms for the design of more believable (and entertaining) agent behaviors.

This practice of iteration is far more rapid than in the lifecycle of a game archetype and is an excellent example of how Darwin's theories are modeled in our business.

Nonetheless, an excellent article Noah.

Noah Falstein
profile image
Interesting comments, everyone. I admit to never having played E.V.O., but I have of course heard of it and should have looked into it closer. I know of half a dozen that use some aspect of evolution that I didn't reference in the article.

Some other specific responses:

DK, I agree that what Darwin had to say about sexual selection was in fact even more interesting in many ways than survival of the fittest, precisely because it seems so counterintuitive. There are a lot of intriguing things we could discuss about game design through that particular lens - everything from how, in the mid-80's, it became "fashionable' to advertise modem play on the game boxes even though a majority of people buying the games didn't actually have modems - turns out they equated modem play with state of the art games, even though it was irrelevant to their own situation. A similar thing happened a few years later with CD-ROM games debuting, features that are seen as "sexy" are important in deciding to buy a game even if they are functionally irrelevant - even the fact that I can use the term sexy in that context shows how relevant Darwin's ideas are.

JVII, I agree that merely drawing parallels is pretty useless, but I disagree that this is the case here. I think there is a lot we can learn from the way biologists classify living things when we attempt to classify game genres, which, like living things, often have contradictory qualities that make it hard to discern their origins until one looks into their ancestral past. Or to put it in very concrete terms, when working on an adventure game design for a recently-released game (Mata Hari) I thought hard about what features of old adventure games were "adaptive" and helped them succeed in the competitive world of commercial games, and which features were the equivalent of an appendix, perhaps once part of a useful function but now just carried along for the ride, consuming resources.

RZ, I have to take exception to your comments. You seem to imply that Darwin is best revered in the US, which is just not true - take a look at http://www.economist.com/daily/chartgallery/displayStory.cfm?story_id=13062613&s
ource=features_box4
for example. Darwin didn't invent or discover evolution, but did put together a coherent way to explain the mechanism behind it, and that (as well as some of his other ideas like sexual selection) is certainly why I appreciate him.

MG, thanks! You do point out two more areas where ideas of evolution are even more directly linked to game development - in fact I expect that agile development/scrum/rapid iteration practices could benefit even more than they already have by applying ideas from evolutionary biology.


none
 
Comment:
 


Submit Comment