|
S.S.: Looking back, are there any decisions or practices you would change, and
if so, why?
J.M.: I would insist on a clear written agreement between all significant shareholders
on how key aspects of the ownership role would be handled, such as exit
plans, personal guarantees, level of acceptable risk, short-term goals, and longterm
goals. If the owners are not in perfect alignment, the business never can be.
The people who are in leadership seats at a twelve-person company are not likely
to be the same people you want in those seats when the company grows larger.
But they remain in those seats at a lot of companies to the detriment of the
company and, ultimately, the careers of those individuals. The people in roles
need to change to make sure their skills and contributions are best aligned with
what the company needs from them to be successful.
S.S.: What is the most important thing you would tell someone making that
transition within their company?
J.M.: You can (and I believe should) be friendly with people, but you cannot retain
close friendships with people who you need to lead. You can pretend that you are
able to, but when you control their livelihood, it simply is not a workable dynamic.
It is best to embrace your new role fully or not to enter it at all.
A company leader
has to be able to make very tough decisions that have very large ramifications on
the lives of individuals. If you are not willing to do this with clear eyes on what will
make the company stronger (thus ultimately helping the most people), you will
not succeed as a leader. This doesn't mean you need to be cold, or that you should
hide your agendas -- just that there is a difference between "friendly" and
"friendship," and it is important to realize the distinction early.
S.S.: Were there any people who helped, and if so how?
J.M.: Other leaders in the company helped. Otherwise, finding people in similar
roles in other companies -- even ones in vastly different fields -- was beneficial
simply to understand what most everyone had to deal with and what was more
specific to my situation. I found it very helpful to just have a safe and confidential
environment where I could bounce ideas, vent, whatever, and not worry at all
about the effect on the company.
S.S.: What are the most common traits shared by other effective leaders in
your experience?
J.M.: Openness, communication, trustworthiness, integrity, ability to motivate,
willingness to take measured risks, not procrastinating, understanding that being
in charge doesn't mean being the expert.
S.S.: Which traits do you feel are your strongest and how does knowledge of
these traits affect how you approach leadership challenges?
J.M.: Getting people to work in a common direction, and openness. I prefer
employing everyone to help move the company in a particular direction instead
of trying to do it all myself.
S.S.: What are the worst traits a leader has exhibited in your experience?
J.M.: Randomness, thinking one is the expert on everything, being wishy-washy,
weak willed, easily overwhelmed, operating from fear, pretending to be a celebrity.
S.S.: How did these traits manifest themselves, and what was the result of their
involvement in terms of the team, project, and/or company?
J.M.: Having a leader who is not consistent and who does not articulate where the
company is going causes constant problems with direction and morale. People
will not do their best because they have no clear goal in front of them, or, worse
yet, will look to leave.
S.S.: Are there any leadership traits you admire or perhaps aspire toward but
don't feel you embody? If so, how do you feel embodying these traits would
make you a better leader? Do you consciously try to develop these traits? Do
you mentor other leaders?
J.M.: Greater sense of being proactive on the large scale decisions that can dramatically
affect the success of the company. I am attempting to develop this. I do
mentor other leaders, usually by modeling behavior.
S.S.: Do you have any training in leadership, either formal or unstructured
(e.g., armed forces experience)? If relevant, in what ways do you apply that
training to challenges in your job?
J.M.: No.
S.S.: What do you see as the toughest challenge facing leads during a gamedevelopment
project cycle or at a game-development company generally?
How have you seen this handled most and least effectively?
J.M.: Leads generally are great at their discipline, and very often people who are
great at their discipline are not great at leading people. They are two very different
skill sets, and it is simply random as to whether someone has both --
having one is not a predilection toward the other. In the worst case, new leads are
thrown onto a team and expected to know how to communicate, how to run
meetings, how to motivate, how to effectively discipline, how to appropriately
filter information from a publisher, etc. It can work well to make them a sub-lead
first, or a lead on a small project with experienced leads as mentors.
S.S.: What are some common mistakes you've seen leads make, be they new or
experienced?
J.M.: Most commonly, it is speaking for the people on their team without getting
input. For example, deciding on schedules without talking to the people actually
doing the work. This destroys morale and breeds friction as each party will blame
the other when the project runs late, but the lead may not hear it publicly due to
the employee's concern for his or her job. The very most important thing for a
new lead to learn is how to communicate, listen, and to make informed decisions
that build teams and do not destroy them.
Many new leads struggle with how much they need to command versus listen,
communicate, collaborate, and guide. New leads sometimes need a lot of mentoring
on this point from more experienced managers. It is common for a lead to
think that this means "telling people what to do" when in fact it is a lot more
about listening.
S.S.: How have you seen new leads best get support from directors or
executives?
J.M.: Mentoring. Sometimes skill seminars, but I'm not sure how well these work.
S.S.: Do you think good leaders can be trained? Or is the essence of a good
leader simply innate ability?
J.M.: It is innate, but can be trained from there. Some people are not leaders and
will never be leaders. A slim few are innately good right away. More commonly,
people have the ability but it has to be developed, trained, and practiced -- like
pretty much every other skill you can think of.
[For those looking for more information on the book, we note that friend of Gamasutra and industry worker Mark Cooke has recently reviewed Team Leadership In The Game Industry.]
|
Many times, we have the notion that a good team is enough to develop a high quality product. By excellent I mean having good practices and good communication skills. But this is false: it is necessary and always will be, a person who takes this specialized convoy of troops to an imminent victory.
I also liked the Q&A with veteran Joe Minton, they were clear and precise. Even thought, I have an objection. Seth asked if a leader could be trained or is it merely an innate ability. Although Joe's response is clear, I feel that there is something more about it. What I mean is that we are beings of habits, which can lead us to success or failure, both personally and professionally.
This reminds me of an anecdote of the acclaimed book by Goleman: Emotional Intelligence; which discuss a case about a middle-aged woman who had many problems in her life: she was fearful, with the inability to make decisions and lead a life worthy of progress and development. Fortunately, one day she has a car accident and strangely, she looses some portion of her memory but only that related to her ineptitude. As soon as her wounds were healed, her life changed. She got very interested in what had happened to her mind and began to investigate the issue, soon becoming an expert and a national leader. What suggests this?
Undoubtedly, the skills of a leader to bring a team to success are surely innate and often go unnoticed in our lives, but at what point? Only those who could be born with this ability, are unique?, if I'm determined to be a leader but I feel that I didn't born with that ability, I'll never know what it means to be a leader? I feel not, I feel is upon us.
One of the treaties by Brian Tracy (in particular 21 ways to become an outstanding manager) suggests some great ways to be an excellent leader. Practice makes perfect: I'm sure that by first have the decision to be a leader and then learn and practice the process of being one, we will become the person we want, without necessarily having an accident to open our eyes.
Sin lugar a dudas, las habilidades de un líder por llevar a un equipo al éxito son seguramente innatas y que muchas veces pasan inadvertidas en nuestras vidas, pero ¿hasta qué punto? ¿Sólo las personas que podrían nacer con esa habilidad son únicas?, si estoy decidido a ser líder pero siento que no nací con esa capacidad, ¿nunca sabré lo que es ser un líder?
Siento que no y esto va muy de la mano con nuestro entorno en que nos desarrollamos y cómo nuestras habilidades van madurando. Uno de los tratados de Brian Tracy (en especial, 21 formas de ser un excelente manager) sugiere 21 caminos para ser un excelente líder. La práctica hace al maestro: estoy seguro que siguiendo esos pasos y con la decisión de ser un gran líder, llegaremos a ser la persona que queremos; sin necesidad de tener un accidente para cambiar nuestra vida.
Excelente artículo. En cuanto termine de escribir ésto, iré a comprar el libro.
Muchas veces, tenemos la noción de que un excelente equipo de trabajo es suficiente para desarrollar un producto de calidad. Excelente me refiero que tengan buenas prácticas de comunicación y buenas habilidades técnicas. Sin embargo esto es falso: es necesario y siempre lo será, una persona que lleve a ese convoy de tropas especializadas hacia una inminente victoria.
Me gustó mucho también las preguntas y respuestas con el veterano Joe Minton, fueron claras y precisas. Sin embargo tengo una objeción. Seth pregunta si un líder podría ser entrenado o es meramente una habilidad innata. Aún cuando la respuesta de Joe es clara, siento que hay algo más acerca de esto. Me refiero a que somos seres de hábitos, los cuales nos pueden llevar al éxito o al fracaso, tanto personal como profesional.
Esto me recuerda una anécdota del aclamado libro de Goleman: Inteligencia emocional. Comenta un caso sobre una mujer de mediana edad que tenía muchos problemas en su vida, era temerosa, con la incapacidad de tomar decisiones y llevar una vida digna de progreso y desarrollo. Afortunadamente, un día tiene un choque automovilístico y, de forma muy extraña, sólo se borra de su mente su pasado relacionado con la ineptitud de su persona. Una vez fuera del hospital, su vida cambió. Se interesó tanto por lo que le había pasado que empezó a investigar sobre el tema, volviéndose una experta y pronto una líder nacional. ¿Qué nos sugiere esto?
Sin lugar a dudas, las habilidades de un líder por llevar a un equipo al éxito son seguramente innatas y que muchas veces pasan inadvertidas en nuestras vidas, pero ¿hasta qué punto? ¿Sólo las personas que podrían nacer con esa habilidad son únicas?, si estoy decidido a ser líder pero siento que no nací con esa capacidad, ¿nunca sabré lo que es ser un líder?
Siento que no y esto va muy de la mano con nuestro entorno en que nos desarrollamos y cómo nuestras habilidades van madurando. Uno de los tratados de Brian Tracy (en especial, 21 formas de ser un excelente manager) sugiere 21 caminos para ser un excelente líder. La práctica hace al maestro: estoy seguro que siguiendo esos pasos y con la decisión de ser un gran líder, llegaremos a ser la persona que queremos; sin necesidad de tener un accidente para cambiar nuestra vida.
What a great article. As soon as I finish writing this, I'll buy the book.
Many times, we have the notion that a good team is enough to develop a high quality product. By excellent I mean having good practices and good communication skills. But this is false: it is necessary and always will be, a person who takes this specialized convoy of troops to an imminent victory.
I also liked the Q&A with veteran Joe Minton, they were clear and precise. Even thought, I have an objection. Seth asked if a leader could be trained or is it merely an innate ability. Although Joe's response is clear, I feel that there is something more about it. What I mean is that we are beings of habits, which can lead us to success or failure, both personally and professionally.
This reminds me of an anecdote of the acclaimed book by Goleman: Emotional Intelligence; which discuss a case about a middle-aged woman who had many problems in her life: she was fearful, with the inability to make decisions and lead a life worthy of progress and development. Fortunately, one day she has a car accident and strangely, she looses some portion of her memory but only that related to her ineptitude. As soon as her wounds were healed, her life changed. She got very interested in what had happened to her mind and began to investigate the issue, soon becoming an expert and a national leader. What suggests this?
Undoubtedly, the skills of a leader to bring a team to success are surely innate and often go unnoticed in our lives, but at what point? Only those who could be born with this ability, are unique?, if I'm determined to be a leader but I feel that I didn't born with that ability, I'll never know what it means to be a leader? I feel not, I feel is upon us.
One of the treaties by Brian Tracy (in particular 21 ways to become an outstanding manager) suggests some great ways to be an excellent leader. Practice makes perfect: I'm sure that by first have the decision to be a leader and then learn and practice the process of being one, we will become the person we want, without necessarily having an accident to open our eyes.