Contents
Examining Game Pace: How Single-Player Levels Tick
 
 
Printer-Friendly VersionPrinter-Friendly Version
 
Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
February 9, 2010
 
Analysts: EA On The Right Track At Last
 
E3 2010 Registration Opens As Major Exhibitors Confirmed
 
Ubisoft Q3 Sales Edge Down, As It Ramps Up Big Franchises
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
February 9, 2010
 
Vicarious Visions / Activision
Audio Programmer
 
Rockstar North
Senior Graphics Programmer
 
Flashpoint Academy
Game Development and Animation Teachers
 
Ubisoft San Francisco
Network Engineer
 
Telltale Games
Senior Game Designer
 
Irrational Games
Multiplayer Level Designer
 
Toys for Bob / Activision
Senior Producer (Temporary)
 
Gameloft
Low Poly 3D Modeling / Texture Artist
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
February 9, 2010
 
arrow Television, Meet Games
 
arrow Two Halves, Together: Patrick Gilmore On Double Helix [1]
 
arrow The Road To Hell: The Creative Direction of Dante's Inferno [20]
 
arrow The Sensible Side of Immersion [11]
 
arrow Jumpstarting Your Creativity [6]
 
arrow Truth in Game Design [49]
 
arrow Postmortem: Vicious Cycle's Matt Hazard: Blood Bath and Beyond [4]
 
arrow Developers React: The iPad's Future [16]
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
February 9, 2010
 
Fixing the GDC 2010 Schedule Builder
 
Lineage 2 Interview - 'Freya Update Is Just a Beginning' - Pt.2
 
Swashbuckling for Landlubbers: Why you may already be encouraging piracy! [19]
spacer
About
spacer News Director:
Leigh Alexander
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Editor At Large:
Chris Remo
Advertising:
John 'Malik' Watson
Recruitment/Education:
Gina Gross
 
Feature Submissions
Features
  Examining Game Pace: How Single-Player Levels Tick
by Mark Davies
10 comments
Share RSS
 
 
May 12, 2009 Article Start Previous Page 2 of 6 Next
 

Tension (Perceived Danger)

Tension occurs from the belief in an unknown danger and can be difficult to achieve, but the result of achieving it can be incredibly immersive. Tension works particularly well in creating the right pace for a horror game.

In order to create tension the right atmosphere must be created. A world has to be crafted that the player can invest in, believe in and ultimately become immersed in. Audio can help a great deal in building tension. Music in particular can create tension by playing to well known triggers that people have learnt from years of films and TV shows.

Advertisement

In truth, whilst tension is created from fear of the unknown, the threat must be known in some way. Take the game Alien Vs Predator, which I feel has possibly the most tense introduction level of any game I have played.

Throughout the level your motion sensor blips and flashes as threats apparently come near you. However, this sequence heavily relies on the player's knowledge of the films to know that the flashing blips on the radar could potentially be the deadly aliens.

To achieve tension when you don't have the luxury of a well-known license to rely on, then you need to show the potential consequence of the threat, or the threat itself in some form. Dead Space does a very good job of building up tension without the player immediately knowing what the threat is. As soon as they board the Ishimura it is plainly obvious that something is seriously wrong.

Tension can also be achieved through a known threat in stealth games. Instead of a fear of the unknown, the tension comes from the fear of being discovered. Games such as Metal Gear Solid and Splinter Cell utilize this fear well by forcing the player to engage in tense scenarios with enemies in close proximity.

Tempo

Tempo describes the level of intensity of action -- how much concentration is required by the player to achieve their goal. Low tempo gameplay tends to be that which requires serious thought and contemplation -- generally puzzles. High tempo gameplay is generally gameplay that requires fast reactions and split-second decisions. High tempo action often induces stress or panic and often at its highest level might be termed "frantic".

There is always a sure-fire method of creating high tempo no matter what the situation -- by imposing a time limit -- or what could be called "Forced Pacing".

Tempo in Movement

Tempo when moving around the environment is determined by the mechanics of the game and the environment itself.

Explorative movement tends to be low tempo, as the player has time to look around and determine their own route.

More acrobatic environment traversal can often be higher tempo. It really achieves high tempo when there is a great sense of flow in the design. A great example of such flow is the Prince of Persia: Sands of Time -- the mechanics and level design merged to create patterns of flow that had high tempo.

Tempo in Puzzles

Puzzles by their very nature tend to be low tempo -- the only real way to create a high tempo puzzle is to add a time pressure. This tends to make them the ideal method of reducing the pace of gameplay as a counterpoint to high paced action like combat.

Tempo in Combat

Combat is usually high tempo as it will require split-second decision making and requires high levels of reaction. The tempo itself may change dramatically over the course of a battle.

General Skirmishes

A general battle against a group of enemies in a game tends to follow a bell-curve pattern. The tempo of the battle builds to a certain tempo before it hits a turning point, where the more the player removes the incoming threat, the easier it becomes to take out the remaining threats.

For example, a Left 4 Dead horde encounter follows this pattern -- the initial build up of enemies increased fairly rapidly up to a maximum number and a frantic tempo, before the player manages to destroy enough to turn the tide of the battle. At this point the lesser numbers make it easier to kill the remaining zombies and the tempo drops off.

Boss Fights

Boss fights tend to have much more of a crescendo feel -- they are generally eased into the first part of the fight, but as they start to chip away at its health it begins to attack with more and more ferocity, until the final phase where it is particularly dangerous. Of course once it is defeated the threat has been completely eliminated the tempo drops to pretty much nothing.

 
Article Start Previous Page 2 of 6 Next
 
Comments

Tom Newman
profile image
Good study! I was glad to see CoD4 used as an example, as this is is probably the most refined single player experience for the genre.
One point I took from this article that really makes me think, is using the language of formal music to describe level design - not that musical analogies work in all examples, but that music has a language to describe these things, but gaming does not. With (video)gaming being only a few decades old, this is understandable, and does not need a forced correction, but it will be very interesting to see how the language of game design evolves in the future years. For now, however, I think musical terms make a great analogy.

Aaron Casillas
profile image
"certainly some more scientific studies of heart rate" not only your heart but a study of numbers and pleasure. I've found in my own personal experience that there is a direct correlation between the speed a player is running at and the perception of space. Thus data to divide up a space, encounters and landmarks et al...tied to pleasure/stimulus expectations...and not forget the division between positive and negative gameplay space. Last but not least of many notes, is the sound of no combat at all! The music of violence has a tempo and a space!

Steven Conway
profile image
Thanks for an interesting read Mark; Csikszentmihalyi's theory of Flow may be of interest to you.


Jeromie Walters
profile image
I have to say I think the correlations to musical concepts were a bit of a stretch, but overall this is a very well-written article on level pacing and I learned a lot from it. Thank you for your insights!

Blake Nicholas
profile image
Here's another thing you have to keep in mind, difficulty of the actual game and checkpoints.

Many of your Threat analysis moments just take the moment into consideration, but what if the player is playing on very easy just to see the story? Then all threat moments of low+ are actually very low. All the tension moments of low+ are actually very low. Movement impetus is always very high.

Now if the player is playing on very hard then any moment, doesn't matter what is happening threat is very high and tension is very high. The only time in that situation when threat and tension are not very high is right after they see a "checkpoint reached", but 1 minute later they have something to lose and their movement impetus is in danger, and thereby the entire pacing of the game is in danger. If a player dies and in a battle and is set back to a checkpoint the movement impetus actually goes in reverse.

So I think difficulty and resurrection methods also have a very large part to do with pacing. If your game is designed for pacing I think it would be in your best interest to not include any difficulty sliders at all. It would also be good to come up with a resurrection mechanic that won't impede the movement impetus by too much.

Everyone that plays your game isn't going to be the same skill level anyway so I think even with the same difficulty for everyone, not everyone will have the same pace. This is a hard solution to fix for an interactive media type, pacing that is, because of the vastly different skill levels that will be playing your game. So I think the answer is in pacing by mechanics that aren't governed by player skill at all. Keep in mind that perceived threat is part of player skill, if they are good at the game or if it is on easy nothing you can do visually or with sound is going to give them the perception of threat. Also keep in mind pacing mechanics like items laying around could very well be ignored entirely by someone that is good or playing on easy because they don't feel they need them at that point.

Carl Trett
profile image
The musical analogy is one that I try to use in every level I make. I draw flow diagrams before I start anything else. Basically a beat chart that is the backbone of my musical piece/level. I then fill all the valleys, troughs and mountain peaks with little musical bits that I feel capture the flow and carry the movement from the previous experience to the next. I guess I try to 'visualize' the levels as a sound-scape of experience more akin to a song than a story. It can be difficult to convey these notions in drawings but simple wave patterns seem to work when describing to teammates what structure the pacing will take.
Planer line drawings of the flow can help people get a sense of what to expect and strive towards. Dotting the spline with symbols representing experiences described by a simple legend can further aid you in taking your musical score from your noggin to the team.
Maybe it just helps to visualize your levels like an Opera piece. If you can internalize the level in your head and especially in your inner ear, then I believe you start from a much more solid and palatable footing.

Cheers, for writing this. I especially like that you took the extra time to create the breakdown of the CoD level. Watching the video and reading your notes side by side was very helpful in picking out the importance of things that may have seemed purposeless without this exercise.

Soeren Lund
profile image
Excellent study and article. The analogy to music provided me with an extra insight into how a perceived pace could be explained to others. Thanks.

Brandon Davis
profile image
Great article! Small segue on music and gaming. Music bears the same significance to gaming, as it did/does to silent movies. Pacing in silent movies is also very much like pacing in video games. Levels in 'the silents' is not as obvious as it is in gaming, but it's still very much an embedded dramatic function.

Chris Proctor
profile image
This article is really useful overall, I'll definitely be referring to it later.

One point of disagreement though:
"Introduce a threat from behind -- as long as the threat is significant it will cause the player to want to move away from it."

Well, in my experience players always first move _towards_ a threat, even a significant threat, unless it's an obviously unbeatable environmental one on the order of rising lava.

And you haven't mentioned the most significant way to guide a player through a level: leaving a trail of enemies for them to kill (of course, this doesn't necessarily apply, some games with progression through levels don't _have_ enemies I suppose, but it's common enough to be worth mentioning).

Theo Tanaka
profile image
Very good article, congratulations for your study. I really enjoyed watching the gameplay video and reading your notes (at the same time remembering what a great level is "All Ghillied Up").

I like to think that levels are pieces of music, and the game (the whole single player campaign) is an album or an opera. It's not just the level that should have a carefully crafted pace, but playing through all the levels should create a good sense of rhythm and integrity. It's not just a matter of creating different levels; each subsequent level should have something to do with the previous one, giving something to the player that ticks him to keep playing the game. If the levels are not crafted together, the player loses interest if the levels are repeating themselves, or gets confused, and consequentally bored, if the levels are totally different from one another.


none
 
Comment:
 


Submit Comment