Contents
NPD: Behind the Numbers, May 2009
 
 
Printer-Friendly VersionPrinter-Friendly Version
 
Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
Video Game Watchdog National Institute On Media And The Family Shutting Down [11]
 
Modern Warfare 2 Infinity Ward's 'Most Successful PC Version' Yet [14]
 
New Tech, Design Details Of Project Natal To Emerge At Gamefest In February
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
Trion Redwood City
Sr. Environment Artist
 
Trion Redwood City
Sr. Evnironment Modeler
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Network Programmer
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Texture Artist
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Character Artist
 
Sucker Punch Productions
3D Environment Artist
 
Crystal Dynamics
Sr. Level Designer
 
Sony Online Entertainment
Brand Manager
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
arrow Upping The Craft: Susan O'Connor On Games Writing [6]
 
arrow Small Developers: Minimizing Risks in Large Productions - Part II [7]
 
arrow iPhone Piracy: The Inside Story [50]
 
arrow And Yet It Grows: Analyzing the Size and Growth of the European Game Market [5]
 
arrow NPD: Behind the Numbers, October 2009 [13]
 
arrow Reflecting On Uncharted 2: How They Did It [5]
 
arrow Sponsored Feature: Rasterization on Larrabee -- Adaptive Rasterization Helps Boost Efficiency
 
arrow Postmortem: Wadjet Eye's The Blackwell Convergence [2]
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
Time Fcuk - A Postmortem [3]
 
Accepting the Inherent Value of Games
 
Planckogenesis, Part II: Song Structure & Gravy Train [1]
spacer
About
spacer News Director:
Leigh Alexander
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Editor At Large:
Chris Remo
Advertising:
John 'Malik' Watson
Recruitment/Education:
Gina Gross
 
Features
  NPD: Behind the Numbers, May 2009
by Matt Matthews
3 comments
Share RSS
 
 
June 15, 2009 Article Start Previous Page 2 of 5 Next
 

Three Facts for Perspective

In a moment we'll show how the industry peaked between January and February of this year, but for the moment, let's get some perspective on the industry's slump. Here are three reasons that could have contributed to lower year-on-year sales in May 2009, irrespective of the current economic conditions.

  • First, note that May is typically one of the weakest months in the videogame calendar. For example, May was the month with the weakest weekly revenue in both 2006 and 2007. In 2005 and again in 2008, May was the third weakest month, again measured by weekly revenue.

    Advertisement

    Often the nascent summer season is cited as the key reason for the industry's weakness in this particular month. As most students finish a school year and begin summer vacations or jobs, that key consumer demographic will spend less time indoors in front of a television or curled up with a handheld gaming device.

  • Second, hardware and software sales were truly extraordinary at the beginning of 2008. Even in a strong economy the industry might have had difficulty keeping pace, much less growing.

    In terms of hardware, Nintendo sold over 3.5 million Wii systems in the first half of 2008 alone. Consider that the PlayStation 2, at the height of its popularity, never broke the 2.5 million system barrier for a comparable period.

    The Nintendo DS was no slouch, selling 3.2 million handhelds during the first half of 2008. Moreover, the PlayStation 3 was in the midst of strong sales in the first half of 2008 as it coasted down from its November 2007 price drop and peaked briefly with the launch of Metal Gear Solid 4.

    Then look at the software slate that accompanied that growth of the hardware base: Super Smash Bros. Brawl (2.7 million in March 2008), Grand Theft Auto IV (2.9 million in April 2008), and Mario Kart Wii (1.1 million in April 2008). Only Resident Evil 5 has come close to that kind of spectacular launch month in 2009, with just over 1.5 million copies in March.

  • Finally, the big-ticket games like Guitar Hero, Rock Band, and Wii Fit may well have run their course for the moment.

    Undoubtedly, expensive games will suffer in a weak economy. But when Nintendo has sold a Wii Fit system for every 3 Wii consoles in the United States and the market is literally awash in plastic guitars, the market is apt to adjust. The drop in revenue just from those music game and Wii Fit bundles is significant enough to explain some of the slowing industry sales.

This isn't to dismiss the economy as a factor in slowing videogame industry revenue. Quite the contrary, the economy may indeed be a key reason that sales are down.

However, it is worth noting that even with the deck stacked against the industry as listed above, industry revenue should still show modest growth by the end of the year.

The Industry Peaked, Briefly

We can measure the health of the videogame industry by looking at a 12-month simple moving average of weekly revenue.

For example, the $415.9 million per week given February 2009 in the figure below is computed by adding up the revenue for March 2008 through February 2009 and then dividing by the number of weeks over which that revenue was accrued.

Viewing the data in this way smooths out seasonal adjustments, since each 12-month period contains exactly one November and December, the months that so strongly skew single-month comparisons.

With one single month exception (September 2008), this simple moving average increased each month for over three years, from $199.3 million per week in February 2006 to $415.9 million per week in February 2009.

At that peak, the industry was at his greatest point in history: a 12-month period during which revenue totalled over $21.6 billion. For comparison, the official total for calendar 2008 was $21.3 billion.

Revenue peak in 2009

(Our reliable industry revenue data does not extend into 2004, preventing us from following this trend back further.)

Then in March 2009, the rate dropped to $410.3 million per week. It dropped again in April and then again in May, ending at $401.3 million per week.

This kind of drop is unprecedented in the data we have available, and it points to a sudden and dramatic shift in the retail-based game industry's fortunes. All previous drops were single-month drops, after which the market revenue had begun climbing again.

In order to match the industry's total revenue for 2008, this moving average will have to creep back up to the $410 million per week level by December 2009. That will require several months of very modest year-on-year growth later in the year or a handful of months with extraordinary growth.

In another couple of months, we can return to this measure of the retail industry's health and see whether it has slowed its descent or begun to rise again.

(It's worth mentioning that there's significant and likely increasing digital-only revenue, including online game subscriptions and microtransactions, not encapsulated in NPD's monthly reports. This continues to be difficult and treacherous to estimate.)
 
Article Start Previous Page 2 of 5 Next
 
Comments

Kouga Saejima
profile image
[Sony's John Koller, director of hardware marketing, told Ben Kuchera of Ars Technica that they have “changed the model from a margin perspective from the 3000”, suggesting that retailers were possibly getting a bigger cut of the $250 retail price. However, we spoke with Mr. Pachter of Wedbush Morgan in email and he does not believe that “the higher pricing has anything to do with adding extra margin for retailers.”]

Koller said they changed the model from a margin perspective yet you still believe Pachter (who only "believes"!) more? I don't get it.

Ted Brown
profile image
Average Sale Price of around $40 seems right [page 4]. Anything higher, and I balk at buying the game unless it's a certified smash hit guaranteed to provide 20 to 30 hours of entertainment. I hope higher-ups start to remember their micro-economics, and reduce price to drive more sales...

Alex Chiang
profile image
@Ted I agree that the price point seems high, especially when you look at titles like the new Indiana Jones game or Velvet Assassin, but Triple-A titles with a proven track record would still go for 60, so you're essentially saying that the industry should adopt price tiering. I don't know if that'd be the best way out of this whole mess, as it seems like it'd just hurt developers trying to introduce new IP's. Who would "judge" which tier a game went into? Murky situation :s


none
 
Comment:
 


Submit Comment