Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
The Road to Diablo III
arrowPress Releases
August 20, 2014
PR Newswire
View All





If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:


 
The Road to Diablo III

September 18, 2009 Article Start Page 1 of 3 Next
 

When StarCraft II is released, it will have been over a decade since a game bearing its brand hit retail shelves, and if Diablo III doesn't ship in 2010 -- which is likely -- it will share that distinction.

Developer Blizzard Entertainment is known for its relentlessly iterative process, which is what leads to the infamous "when it's done" release mentality, and Diablo III is no exception. Thought to have gone through several complete reboots since the closure of original series developer Blizzard North in 2005, the game has already seen significantly redesigned elements since its formal unveiling last June.

To get a sense of how that design process works -- and when the team knows it's actually done -- Gamasutra sat down with two Diablo development leads: lead technical artist Julian Love, a Blizzard North veteran, and lead content designer Kevin Martens, who spent nearly a decade at BioWare before coming to Blizzard.

The pair discussed Blizzard design and art philosophy, the evolution of the Blizzard North style, the action RPG genre, and Blizzard's flat development structure.

Diablo III was announced last year; it's been playable twice at Blizzcon now. Mike Morhaime suggested it probably won't be out until 2011. Does it feel like the development time has been extended to a surprising degree? Do you ever think, "Oh God, this really will be a while longer now?"

Kevin Martens: Here's the secret to Blizzard games, and this is a secret that won't help any of our competitors: endless iteration. We'll take something, we'll put it in the game. Maybe we'll like it when we put it in, maybe we won't. We'll leave it in there for a while, we'll let it percolate. We'll play it and play it and play it, and then we'll come back. We might throw it all out, or we'll throw half of that out and redo it.

It can be a long time, but it is fun to work on as well. That's the thing that keeps you going. Multiplayer always works, and the builds are always playable. We've played them constantly, and it's fun. You actually look forward to the weekly play session even though the game is still in progress. That's what keeps us going, and that's also why it takes so long. We'll do it over and over again until it's just right.

With Diablo, and StarCraft moreso, it will have been a decade since there's been a game in the series out. Blizzard North as an entity no longer exists. How do you determine what needs to be retained from something a decade old, and what needs to be modernized?

Julian Love: Well, as an ex-Blizzard North employee, I never got the sense that we were a standalone entity. We were always in contact with Blizzard South folks. They were always coming up. I think I saw it as we were one big company.

That said, [as far as] the real question in terms of how much we're going to take forward, we want to bring back all of the stuff that was great, that was fun. We certainly want to tap into what was great in the first two games and make sure all of that stuff is coming back, and pile in all the cool stuff we can to bring it over the top and make it the definitive version of the series.

On the topic of Blizzard North and Blizzard Entertainment though, I do feel there was a difference in style between the Blizzard North and South games. The Diablo titles had a more baroque, intricate look, more tilework and stonework "along the grid." Diablo III is more of a blend of that style with the current Blizzard South style. How long did it take you to settle on the look for Diablo III?

Julian Love: Well, it took a while for us to settle on the actual style, but I don't think it was due any kind of difference between Blizzard North and Blizzard South philosophy. It had more to do with the fact that we were moving the game from a two-dimensional technology platform to a three-dimensional technology platform.

Issues like lighting and separation between the characters and the backgrounds are handled in entirely different ways -- ironing out how to get what we felt was a Diablo vibe while still managing to get the characters to pop.

Looking at D2, for instance, those characters are super bright, super colorful. They pop out of the backgrounds. So, we had to try to bring that forward, but at the same time we don't want to just rest on that art style and do the exact same game.

We want to elevate that. We've got to look at the other games that Blizzard does, learn from the things that they've done that make those games better, and really progress. I think what you're seeing in the art style is our idea of the actual progression of the Diablo universe.


Article Start Page 1 of 3 Next

Related Jobs

Nordeus
Nordeus — Belgrade, Serbia
[08.20.14]

Senior Game Designer
CCP
CCP — Newcastle, England, United Kingdom
[08.20.14]

Senior VFX artist
ZeniMax Online Studios
ZeniMax Online Studios — Austin, Texas, United States
[08.20.14]

Business Intelligence Analyst
InnoGames GmbH
InnoGames GmbH — Hamburg, Germany
[08.20.14]

Software Developer Analytics / Big Data (m/f)






Comments


Seth Burnette
profile image
A cynical part of me thinks that this is masturbatory game development that Blizzard is getting away with simply because they have the money to throw at it. When at the end of the process you just have a polished 3D version of Diablo 2, you have to wonder if it comes down to tweaks for tweaks sake.



On the other hand, I will likely love this game and truly appreciate all that polish when it comes out.

Ted Brown
profile image
I wonder what Blizzard would produce if only given 9 months of real dev time, as opposed to 9 years.

Wolf Wozniak
profile image
Still not as dark as the first game.



Not buying.

Andre Gagne
profile image
Speaking of this genre, Has anyone taken a look at the Sacred series? It seems to have slipped under the limelight.

Enrique Dryere
profile image
Sounds to me like Blizzard is just trying to get the same level of polish in the class mechanics and balance as you'd expect from an MMORPG that's been out for a couple of years, which is smart because although D3 is not an outright MMO, it will certainly have to compete against them.

Prakash Angappan
profile image
Nice article, thanks to Chris Remo

Fernando D'Andrea
profile image
People talk about the D3 art direction as being dark was the only interesting thing in the previous installments.

Joshua Sterns
profile image
@ Wolf.....If you lower the display brightness and contrast you will get dark.



I don't understand why people ride the hate train. The game isn't out, and has years to go. All of the environments have not been denoted, and besides the pictures above look fantastic. I've never understood the hatred for popular games. Halo sucks because it's Halo. Diablo sucks cause it's Diablo. etc. etc. etc. In reality these games sell millions and define genres.



Luckily Blizzard doesn't really need to care about the haters. They have Bucket of Money aka WoW, and millions of fans who appreciate their high quality work.

Roger Miller
profile image
I have to agree with Joshua. I can understand people have a bond with the previous Diablo games, as do I. But Diablo II was not all dark from from a visual point. If you Google for images, most of the outdoors scenes are bright. The desert we anything but visually dark. It was the created atmosphere that made it sinister and dark and that was achieved through art, sound, game play and story. I really urge people to hold back on the flaming until its actually released. You might be right but I feel like we owe the creators of the previous two games (which we are passionate about) a chance. They seem to be committed to get it right.

Ruthaniel van-den-Naar
profile image
@Joshua: Blizzard si McDonald of game industry, they realy could do lots of thing better, but realy dont must, because money. WoW, Starcraft, Diablo must be for everyone and this is the problem, realy good craft, but nothing revolution - machine on money.

I my vision of industry, such big developers as Blizz must invest money to experimental projects or industry will be only standing on place without progress - Two branches - mainstream Diablo, Starcraft, WoW and experimental, is needed. For hardcore gamers is next same Diablo as 2 relatively boring, first Diablo was also small revolution.


none
 
Comment: