|
Video game sound can often be
perceived as a car-crash of sound effects, wall to wall music, and out of
context or hard-to-understand dialogue. However, there are some well
established artistic techniques within similar media, such as TV and Film
sound, that can help allow for moments of relative calm which serve to
intensify moments of subsequent chaos, without needing to turn everything up to
11 all the time.
This feature examines common examples of dynamics from horror
cinema and how those rules can be adapted to game design and game audio in any
genre through graphic visualisation and planning techniques.
Putting
the 'Design' back into Sound Design
'Design' is one of the most
important areas of sound design, in that the sound designer needs to sit down,
over the course of many planning meetings, with game designers and plot out and
map the intended experience from start to finish.
This is done via each and
every mission and cinematic and decide where the game needs to deliver the
biggest impact, both from a macro-cosmic level for the entire game, and
potentially a microcosmic level for each mission stage. This is, in effect,
designing the dynamic range of the game experience and mapping where audio will
follow that curve or any areas where audio needs to play against that curve.
Audio clearly needs to be involved in this planning process as music, sound and
dialogue are some of the more potent tools for delivering subtlety and
intensity in a game. This process is one of the many aspects of sound design
that doesn't involve sitting in a studio designing sound effects and tuning
game audio, it is potentially the most important to the integrity of the whole
soundtrack, as it will dictate where music, fx and dialogue all need to work
together with the game flow.
Structure
and Dynamic Range
A
wide dynamic range is often talked about in audio terms as very desirable,
meaning amount of difference between the quietest and the loudest sounds.
Something with no dynamic range cannot be experienced for very long before the
viewer, or listener, becomes fatigued and reaches for the off-switch.
A game
without a range of varied game-play moments and experiences for the player will
more often than not result in a game soundtrack that has little or no dynamic
range. Batman: Arkham Asylum and Dead Space are wonderful examples of games
that have been carefully designed to have specific moments of calm, moments of
silence, a mixture of stealth and combat as well as moments of intense action
and resulting high volume sound, music and dialogue.
These games are wonderful
examples of structured experience, and dynamics in both game-play and audio
grow from structure and from the ability to control the intensity of the moment prior to an intense moment.
Dynamics
Mapping
The dynamics of any game-play
narrative can be easily plotted on a linear graph that only needs vague
intensity measurements or gestures (fig 1). Each game-play element, mission or
level can be plotted showing how the intended narrative intensity of that
mission or event should feel over time. A curve can be applied to the map the
intensity of each mission, each level and eventually the game structure as a
whole.
Once a 'game intensity' curve has been drawn out, the separate audio
elements, music, sound effects and dialogue can either play with the game intensity curve or play against it. This map can even be used to
set up expectations in the matching of audio action to game-play action, and
then break those rules as the narrative progresses to provide even further
excitement and immersion in game-play.
|
I've been lucky enough to get in early on projects to plan out the 'dynamics' of games before they're made. However, the problem with games is the iterative and evolving nature of development. Unlike film, we usually don't have a cast-iron script from beginning of development to end, so trying to plan early and then adapt emotional dynamics can backfire, as you end up trying to distort your original plan into what the project has become. Flexibility is the key, along with the ability to step away and see the new form of the project with fresh eyes. Sticking too closely to your original ideas can end up with a confused and ineffectual message.
A far more suitable approach to game audio design planning is less about overall mapping, based on amount of combat/level content/etc but instead on focused significance. Picking elements which are less likely to change because the game design relies on them. The dynamics of these are more reliable and can therefore be utilized effectively with less fear of the plan going out the window. These elements can be subtly incorporated throughout the whole game, connecting the dots and creating an underlying audio narrative that can be as subtle or in-your-face as you like.
I'm going off on a total tangent though because 'planning' the audio design wasn't really the focus of this article, but it's the next logical step after mapping out an existing project for problems... so I thought I'd throw in my 2 cents :)
Glad you wrote the article. There is FAR too much focus on the technical aspect of game audio and not nearly enough of the 'design' aspect. The sooner we concentrate more on WHAT we're doing rather than HOW we're doing the better :D
R