Our Properties: Gamasutra GameCareerGuide IndieGames Indie Royale GDC IGF Game Developer Magazine GAO
My Message close
Contents
State Of The Point-and-Click Art
 
 
Printer-Friendly VersionPrinter-Friendly Version
 
Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
February 9, 2012
 
What Nintendo's 2011 sales mean for Wii U, third parties
 
DICE 2012: Culture, pride lead to success at Skyrim maker Bethesda [3]
 
DICE 2012: Is the publishing model broken? [14]
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
February 9, 2012
 
2K Marin
FX Artist - XCOM
 
Visual Concepts
Software Engineer, VC China (Shanghai)
 
Visual Concepts
Senior Producer, VC China (Shanghai)
 
2K Marin
Senior Rendering Programmer
 
2K Marin
Level Designer
 
Visceral Games Redwood Shores
Sr. Gameplay Engineer-Visceral Games
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
February 9, 2012
 
arrow Postmortem: CyberConnect 2's Solatorobo: Red the Hunter
 
arrow Jerked Around by the Magic Circle - Clearing the Air Ten Years Later [32]
 
arrow Building the World of Reckoning [4]
 
arrow SPONSORED FEATURE: TwitchTV - How to Build Community Around Your Game in 2012 [13]
 
arrow Happy Action, Happy Developer: Tim Schafer on Reimagining Double Fine [9]
 
arrow Building an iOS Hit: Phase 1 [11]
 
arrow Postmortem: Appy Entertainment's SpellCraft School of Magic [5]
 
arrow Talking Copycats with Zynga's Design Chief [82]
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
February 9, 2012
 
The Devil Is in the Details of Action RPGs - Part One: The Logistics of Loot [2]
 
Xbox LIVE Indie Games at it Again
 
Merging Waterfall and SCRUM [3]
 
Business Post Mortem: Wolf Toss: Pre-launch Planning & Blended CAC
 
Minmaxing - Is turn-based fun anymore? [53]
spacer
About
spacer Editor-In-Chief/News Director:
Kris Graft
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Senior Contributing Editor:
Brandon Sheffield
News Editors:
Frank Cifaldi, Tom Curtis, Mike Rose, Eric Caoili, Kris Graft
Editors-At-Large:
Leigh Alexander, Chris Morris
Advertising:
Jennifer Sulik
Recruitment:
Gina Gross
 
Feature Submissions
 
Comment Guidelines
Sponsor
Features
  State Of The Point-and-Click Art
by Andrew Goulding [Game Design]
9 comments Share on Twitter Share on Facebook RSS
 
 
July 7, 2010 Article Start Page 1 of 4 Next
 

[The adventure genre has some life in it yet, and here experienced contemporary developer Andrew Goulding turns his experiences on PlayFirst's Avenue Flo and Emerald City Confidential, as well as his own Jolly Rover, into salient design rules.]

A Brief History: The Past

The '80s saw the emergence of the text adventure. Increasing computer power allowed this to evolve into the graphical adventure. Further advances in technology saw mainstream use of the mouse, replacing the text parser with a cursor, evolving this into what we now know as the point-and-click adventure.


The golden years

The early '90s saw a rise in the popularity of the point-and-click adventure, the heavy hitters being Sierra and LucasArts. LucasArts' adventures, first arriving later into the game than Sierra's, did away with the text parser from the start and began their life with the verb interface.

They also summarized the standard text commands, and more importantly, focused more on characters and story. Further evolution was made to reduce the interaction into its base components: look at, talk to, interact with, and walk to.

The early '90s was a golden era of point-and-click adventure, most fondly remembered by today's fans, but by the mid '90s the genre was waning.

Maybe it was the emergence and dominance of the first person shooter, maybe the growth of multiplayer games, maybe the obligatory need to go 3D, maybe the home console; whatever it was, by the late '90s many were calling the point-and-click adventure a dead genre.

The resistance movement

But it was never dead to some people; there was still a diehard fan base, dedicated to keeping the genre alive, refusing to believe the genre they loved so much was dead. This fan base was considered too niche for mainstream developers to focus their attention on.

So what was the relatively small group of fans of this fading genre to do? The answer of course was to start making their own games. The growth of this can be directly attributed to adventure game creation engines like Chris Jones' Adventure Game Studio.

This tool helped spawn the careers of several noted adventure game developers, such as Dave Gilbert and Yahtzee Croshaw. But these games, while giving fans exactly what they wanted, and possessing compelling stories, characters and puzzles, followed the same conventions as their predecessors -- doing little to evolve the mechanics of the genre to open it to new players, as was happening other genres during this time.

The rise of digital distribution

Meanwhile, a new type of game was being coined: the casual game. This arguably started with someone realizing millions of people were playing Minesweeper, Solitaire and other card games on their PCs. These were simple, accessible games, with small time commitments, big rewards, and small budgets, reaching a wide audience digitally, and the best part is that they were making money!

With the growth of these casual games, distributed digitally, there was a new accepted method of reaching customers. And there was also a new way small developers could make small games and make a profit.

Indie adventures... earning money!?

The rise of digital distribution suited developers of point-and-click adventures to a tee. Games developed in Adventure Game Studio were being sold for a small profit.

Then Telltale Games appeared on the scene, not only successfully implementing the idea of episodic content, but breathing life into the old classics, such as Sam & Max, that defined the genre back in the golden years. Finally, the niche adventure game audience was being fed again. But were the new games hitting the mark?

Lack of evolution

One problem with adventure games having lain dormant for so long is that they didn't have a chance to evolve with the rest of gaming's foundational genres. In some respects, adventure games have been stuck in the '90s, and the recent resurgence has picked up right where things left off.

The need for evolution

What we are seeing now is successful adventure game developers going through a period of rapid evolution as they come to terms with an audience with a very different set of circumstances -- an audience with limited time and spoiled for choice.

No longer are people going to wander around for four hours until they happen to use one particular item on another, or find that 2 by 5-pixel area. Even hardcore fans begrudge this kind of treatment as they turn to Mass Effect 2, Halo, or Grand Theft Auto for a more user-friendly experience.

The casual point-and-click adventure?

When I began development of my game, Jolly Rover, I had just come from two tours of duty working as a contract programmer on two adventure games being published by casual game developer PlayFirst. The first game was Emerald City Confidential, working for Dave Gilbert, the second was Avenue Flo, working directly for PlayFirst. Emerald City Confidential's design was approached from the traditional adventure game side, while Avenue Flo's design was approached from the traditional casual game side.

 
Article Start Page 1 of 4 Next
 
Comments

jaime kuroiwa
profile image
It's a little disturbing that "casual gamers" need so much prodding to keep them interested in adventure gaming. A severe limitation of dialogue? Object hunts? Hand-holding hint systems?

*spoken in old man voice*
In my days, we had to trudge through screen-filling text, two-frame animations, and automated hints...from a TELEPHONE!

*back to normal voice*
While I can understand that this is way to get casuals into adventure gaming, it's certainly not what would bring me -- a "traditional" -- back to the genre. For me, it was always about the story. If the plot was interesting enough, whatever format the designer chose to tell the story (PnC, SCUMM, FMV, etc.), I'd take a shot at it. I'd play anything if it piqued my curiosity. That being said, all of these "casual" mechanics seem to take away a lot of the mystery that would prompt me to continue playing.

I mean, if I knew exactly where to go and what to do, then where's the adventure?

Ken Kinnison
profile image
Broken sword had a fairly recent (first xbox) game... I still think they're viable games as long as SOME consideration of drudgery is made and the realisation that you aren't going to compete on a sales level with halo or CoD.
Not every game should have to to be successful either. Frankly we need more of these games on the consoles- I'm pretty open minded, and I like me some shooters, but that seems to be ALL there is lately.

*old man voice*
When I was your age, we might be stuck for 2 weeks on ONE PUZZLE! AND WE LIKED IT!

Ken Kinnison
profile image
A design suggestion- you might add an asterisk to the color coding- some people have color blindness or high contrast visual issues, adding a symbol is a quick fix for removing the frustration.

Andrew Goulding
profile image
That asterisk idea is great! I'm definitly going to add that if I get a chance to make another game.

While I have included the option of all these casual mechanics in the game, they're not in your face. If you don't want any hints, you can tell the parrot to shut up and he won't bug you ever again. If you don't want item highlighting, don't touch the space bar. If you don't want to collect any of the crackers, pieces of eight or pirate flags, you don't have to! But the text highlighting is still there, as well as a current quest at the top to keep you on track, I believe these are not giving too much away and only serve to keep you from wasting time, so you can get on with enjoying the story.

Sharon Hoosein
profile image
So this is probably a slight tangent, but as someone who is mostly a casual gamer, I have to say there's nothing wrong with lots of dialogue and an intricate plot. But the main appeal of casual games is that it's a way to have a fun engaging experience without the massive time commitment it takes for a more "hardcore" game. A lot of hardcore games are littered with missions and subplots that aren't really necessary for the core narrative experience. So while the story in casual games doesn't have to be shallow or overly simple, it does have to be efficient.
In fact, I'd actually like to see more casual games that rely more on meaningful choices/trade offs instead of excessive amounts of virtual bonus items for replay-ability.

The thing about dialogue is that the player has to wait for the "Press ENTER to continue" prompt, which gets tedious for lengthy conversations. However if the player were allowed to interact with the environment while the text lingered/changed on screen, this would be less of an issue.

Jolly Rover does seem like a fun game and this article is definitely an interesting read. Thanks for posting.

marty howe
profile image
Andrew, are people buying this? Are you able to indicate sales figures to date?

Andrew Goulding
profile image
Hi Marty, yes, people are indeed buying this. It was number 1 in Steam's Casual and Indie game sections for a time. Reached the top 10 in the Adventure section as well.

That's not to say I'm retiring on an island in the caribbean just yet, or even that I'm in a position to begin another development. As for sales figures... I may do a post mortem on my experience with Jolly Rover in a year or so, but right now I'm not releasing anything.

Dan Felder
profile image
Casual gamers don't want to be led along the game, they want to experience and explore as well - but always in ways that further their progression through the overall game and in ways that are frequent and engaging. Leading players through the game is one way to make sure they're never getting stuck... But why don't we like getting stuck? Because it's frustrating. Adventure games are about discovery and we want to be able to make constant discoveries. Just as a car with a bad steering mechanism is frustrating to drive, so is an adventure game that has long stretches where the world doesn't interact with the player's actions equally maddening. A good adventure title is one that just WORKS, and flows, like the smoothest of engines and steering. Casual gamers just don't have the obsessive dedication that "hardcore" gamers do, much like the hardcore apple users will wait in line for six hours for the new iPhone. Does waiting in line for six hours add to the experience of the iphone itself? A twisted sense of accomplishment perhaps, buy most people couldn't care less.

Think of adventure games in this context. Some just want to play so bad that they'll overlook almost any difficulty.

Jalane Farrington
profile image
Love this article, nicely organize! Can't say much right now, I'm not even through... lol.


none
 
Comment:
 




UBM Techweb
Game Network
Game Developers Conference | GDC Europe | GDC Online | GDC China | Gamasutra | Game Developer Magazine | Game Advertising Online
Game Career Guide | Independent Games Festival | Indie Royale | IndieGames

Other UBM TechWeb Networks
Business Technology | Business Technology Events | Telecommunications & Communications Providers

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Contact Us | Copyright © UBM TechWeb, All Rights Reserved.