Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
October 22, 2014
arrowPress Releases
October 22, 2014
PR Newswire
View All

If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:

Can Zero Point Make The  Minecraft  Of Shooters?
Can Zero Point Make The Minecraft Of Shooters? Exclusive
December 23, 2011 | By Christian Nutt

December 23, 2011 | By Christian Nutt
More: Console/PC, Indie, Exclusive, Production, Business/Marketing

In 2008, Kim Haar Jorgensen had scored greenlight meetings with Microsoft and 2K Games, among other publishers. But the financial crisis took the bottom out of the market, and he couldn't get his title -- Interstellar Marines -- signed.

At the time, he'd assembled a team of 20 -- small by triple-A standards -- and created a demo in Unreal Engine.

He burned through his initial investment, but he learned a valuable lesson: "no publisher's going to pick up a small indie studio with a hugely expensive idea."

Now, he's got a core team of four in a small office in Copenhagen, and he's switched development to Unity. So, too, have his plans changed. On Christmas, Zero Point Software will release the first version of Deadlock, its first multiplayer offering, to a closed slice of its community. This will be the team's third release, following Bullseye and Running Man, two earlier prototypes.

"The first release is going to be for our closed community that we have, and we're going to commit, through using Scrum, on releasing more content on a bi-weekly basis -- kind of like Minecraft was doing when they started out," says Jorgensen.

The promise is this: "In two weeks it's going to be better, and in four weeks it's going to be even better." The team will set up a thread on the forum for each sprint -- and "let them see our next sprint commitments... we might even have votes."

Up till now, he says, "it's been about us talking about the things we're doing, and not allowing people to see or play it -- and that's just changing from Christmas forward, and there's going to be progress on a regular basis."

In fact, the company has a dedicated fan base already assembled at, its community website -- which is even somewhat gamified, as users can buy badges that show up on their profile for $6.25.

The real core of their plans, however, is "a small prologue story is going to be developed with the community, iteratively," says Jorgensen.

"Play the game, comment on it, have fun, and see it constantly evolve. That's the main experience we want people to have," says Anders Antoft, lead artist and programmer.

"We had this idea if we just showed our work and let people preorder it ahead of time that might be a revenue generator for us," he says.

Jorgensen had big dreams, you see, and he didn't want to let go of them. When he was telling Gamasutra about the story of the game -- which involves the best of the best of Earth's elite soldiers being recruited for a special forces unit to be sent into space -- it's clear that his triple-A ambitions don't end with polished gameplay. 

"For us, arrogantly speaking, it is our Star Wars. It is the game we believe could become a really successful high quality franchise. The war we're fighting is, is it possible to do that starting small, or do you need to have $25 million dollars?"

"In science fiction, you look out the eyes of the character and you are the marine. It's not something we take lightly," he says.

Even though the game is being distributed online, he has no illusions of the bar that he has to reach: "the kind of crowd we're catering to is triple-A shooters, and they're used to playing polished, triple-A experiences like Battlefield and Call of Duty."

He's banking, instead, that people are getting bored of the "copy-paste" of mainstream games.

Working with the community, however, will present its own challenges for a team with a very distinct vision (and plans for not one, not two, but three triple-A quality co-op campaigns in the long run.)

"The big challenge for us as we see is that we know exactly what type of game we want. Obviously having people commenting and giving feedback allows us to take the best feedback, if it's in tune with what we want," says Jorgensen.

"The core of our game is the cooperative experience," he says. "The challenge for us is to hold back and focus on what's best for the community that's playing, as well as -- for us -- we have a hidden agenda in the background."

Right now, Zero Point is selling lifetime subscriptions to the game for $48.75, which will include all updates and all three planned single player installments. There are cheaper options, too.

"We can try and sell the larger picture as well, hopefully more and more people will be interested, but it is an uphill climb," says Jorgensen.

He's not quite sure what the future could bring, but he does see big possibilities. "It all depends on the type of support that we can get. The things that Notch is doing with Minecraft -- it could have been World of Warcraft. He could have poured all of his money into that."

Still, the team has no plans to grow large, says Antoft.

"It's a huge leap to take that right now, to pay $39 for something that's so immature and in development, but it's going to be so attractive if it goes the way we planned... When they're finished it's a good deal, right now it's a leap of faith," says Jorgensen.

Still, says Antoft, hardcore Interstellar Marines fans are convinced. "Right now, we have people saying, 'I need more value, and I'll pay for more.'" 

"This is the first time that we feel that this is going to be doable. Without having us talking to a lot of investors and gathering a lot of money, we can sort of build it up."

Related Jobs

Nexon America, Inc.
Nexon America, Inc. — El Segundo, California, United States

Localization Coordinator
Petroglyph Games
Petroglyph Games — Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

DeNA Studios Canada
DeNA Studios Canada — Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Analytical Game Designer
Xsolla — Sherman Oaks, California, United States

Senior Business Development Manager


Jacob Crane
profile image
Keep it up guys! It can be a hard climb, but I think what you have done so far has been fantastic.

Kale Menges
profile image
Agreed. You guys have accomplished a lot. Interstellar Marines has great design and fantastic production values. Keep on keeping on.

Matthew Downey
profile image
Awww, I wanted to make the Minecraft of shooters.

Pseudo-sarcasm aside, IM definitely has good graphics and even better sound, but they also need to polish their gameplay if multiplayer is their number one goal. I personally think the next shooter to minimize camping behavior will attract a massive crowd. My guess based on footage and demos is that I could camp in IM, which does not make the gameplay fundamentally different from every "realistic" shooter on the market. I say this because I would think the elite interstellar marines should be fearless instead of cowering in the shadows. All my opinion of course.

I do give them kudos for working with Unity3d, because then fans can easily participate in making mods of the game (easy coding and level design).

Sorry for the skepticism and good luck.

shayne oneill
profile image
Personally I'd scale that price back a little bit. Part of what minecrafts success work is that at $10 it represented fundamentally fantastic value for the amount of gameplay one could get out of it. People have been playing that game non-stop for a good year now, and its very hard to argue (although some still whinge) that the $10 wasnt money well spent.

If it was $40, I think notch would not have had a fraction of the playerbase he does, and sober questions ought be asked about whether the players will feel theres as much gameplay content available.

However I'm not much of a shooter type, so I'm the wrong person to take counsel from regarding this demographic. The high quality art assetts certainly will help sell the game!

R Hawley
profile image
Just what IS the Minecraft of shooters? The two are ying and yang. However we've been through all the above and more, two years of development, people wanting to throw money at us and still can't get funding to finish. PayBeta is the way forward, the upside is you get to keep all the marbles on completion.

And if you don't like the beta? Well it's your fault for trying it too soon right?

Ameet Virdee
profile image
with digital distribution these days, if you don't like the finished game, you still don't get your money back anyway.

Yama Habib
profile image
$48.75? That's an awfully specific (and high) price for a game that's basically still in Alpha. Unless of course you're aiming for the final product to be subscription based or sell for $100 or so, in which case you've got some large hurdles ahead.

I *do* appreciate someone taking the wheel behind breaking the tradition of having large gaming companies copy-pasting first person shooters to make boatloads of money. I also rather like the idea of a shooter that evolves over time, rather than having incremental "sequels" every year that sell for $70 a pop and hardly change anything. If only the all of those "Madden"-esque titles could take a page out of that book.

We'll see where this goes from here. If it ends up being a subscription based game, I'm probably not going to play it ever, since I'm staunchly against paying monthly fees for videogames. If not, then $48.75 is too steep for right now. If they lower the alpha cost by at least half or so, I'll jump on board.

Hilario Martins
profile image
The $48.75 gives you access to the planed three games of the series so imo is very good value.