Tiger Style outlines how iOS price drops affect overall sales data
[In this article originally published on Tiger Style's official website, studio co-founder and indie developer Dave Kalina offers some insight on how iOS prices affect overall sales trends.
Along the way, he presents data outlining how his games have sold in the period before and after their recent price drop.
We recently shared
our lifetime sales numbers.
The same day, we dropped price on all of our products.
Our strategy was to try and create news and attention by coordinating several newsworthy events simultaneously. Our Waking Mars
update had new jetpacks to collect and play with, and enhanced support for the iPad Retina Display.
We issued a press release and personally reached out to a number of folks in the press, asking for coverage. We wrote blog posts to attract attention to our games.
We dropped the price of the soundtrack on Bandcamp. We dropped the price of both Spider
SKUs for the first time in a long time. And we dropped the price of Waking Mars
from 4.99 to 2.99 for the first time ever.
It’s been two weeks, so how’d we do?
WAKING MARS SALE ($4.99 -> $2.99)
Here are the 15 days before the sale:
We earned $12,946 in revenue during that period. There was a blip in the data on 4/24-25 where we spiked upwards -- we believe this was due to a piece on a Yahoo! Games blog called “Plugged In” that featured us
nicely (484 comments on that piece indicate to me that people are reading this blog!). Normally single press events don’t seem to make a tangible difference, but some of the bigger ones do. Even accounting for that spike, we were earning approximately $863 a day for the last 15 days at $4.99.
Here are the 15 days post-sale:
We earned $25,733 on sale, selling an additional 12,622 copies. That’s nearly double what we were earning over the previous 15 day window, but the trends are indicating a bottoming out. You can see that we had one amazing day at $6,201 earned, and then yesterday, we earned about 1/10 of that ($647). That’s a bit better than the two Mondays pre-sale ($564 and $497) but we’re approaching a state of being revenue neutral, so we’re going to end the sale tonight.
You can see this trend on the charts as well. We got as high as the number 18 iPad game, hung out at a nice chart position all week (thanks in large part to another Apple feature) … and then the rank started collapsing, and hasn’t bottomed out quite yet.
Interestingly the iPhone charts show a much gentler bump and then a flatter curve. We didn’t have a banner in the iPhone store, so that’s probably part of it, but I think our game is just not perceived as being “for” the iPhone. Potential consumers see our product and can probably pretty easily imagine playing it on a 3.5 inch screen, and they (correctly) perceive that it’s “for” the iPad. (Of course, it plays great in both places and you should still buy it! My point is more that I think consumers are looking for something a bit more approachable on the iPhone, in most cases)
SPIDER SALE ($2.99 -> $0.99)
As for Spider
… we only put it on sale for a week, and the results were not amazing. The HD version -- which received a retina update -- did pull in approximately an extra $900. For a game that has been earning $30-40 a day, this is certainly welcome, but after the first 3 days, sales numbers were very close to where they started.
The iPhone version fared even worse, actually earning less
money at $0.99 the weekend following the sale versus the weekends before and after the sale period. We still probably came out ahead $300-400 dollars from the initial spike in attention, but it actually seems to be the case that we are better off at $2.99 for now.
All things considered, this effort was successful -- we reached a significant number of new users, (hopefully) increased the perceived value of the product, and pocketed a nice chunk of extra revenue. Long term, it’s harder to predict how much these efforts help. I used to fear that sales would serve to cannibalize your potential user base -- how many of the people who just bought Waking Mars
at $2.99 would have eventually
bought it at $4.99? It’s impossible to know. iOS has definitely taught people that, if they wait just a little bit, practically everything goes on sale.
This is one reason we’re more willing to play with our pricing this time around (Spider
did not go on sale for over a year after its release). The market expects it, and there are gamers who may love our stuff who, for whatever reason, won’t buy it at $4.99. We’re reaching new players every day, and hopefully we’ll have plenty more reasons to make news in the coming year and keep the product on people’s minds. Staying relevant over a long period of time is, in my opinion, one of the core tricks to success on iOS.