My Message close
GAME JOBS
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
May 18, 2013
 
All You Need is Love [1]
 
Students: Tips for Learning Game Development Over the Summer
 
All Your Nintendo Let's Plays Are Belong To Nintendo? [76]
 
Even Further Down the Curation Rabbithole [11]
 
Systems of Control in F2P [23]
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
May 18, 2013
 
Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC
Sr. Network Systems Engineer
 
Amazon Game Studios
Sr. Game Designer
 
Amazon Game Studios
Quality Assurance Manager
 
Treyarch / Activision
Technical Animator
 
Amazon Game Studios
Game Development Engineer
 
Amazon Game Studios
Game Graphics Engineer
spacer
Latest Press Releases
spacer View All     RSS spacer
 
May 18, 2013
 
Zeeek and The Secret of
Space Octopuses heading
to...
 
Battle bad 'bots in Bad
Bots, available now on...
 
Temple Run 2 Adds New
Terrain and Obstacles
in...
 
Little Amazon runs
through Android
 
Command Ops gets a
Massive Update!
spacer
About
spacer Editor-In-Chief:
Kris Graft
Blog Director:
Christian Nutt
Senior Contributing Editor:
Brandon Sheffield
News Editors:
Mike Rose, Kris Ligman
Editors-At-Large:
Leigh Alexander, Chris Morris
Advertising:
Jennifer Sulik
Recruitment:
Gina Gross
Education:
Gillian Crowley
 
Contact Gamasutra
 
Report a Problem
 
Submit News
 
Comment Guidelines
Sponsor

 
Soderlund details EA's innovation labs
Soderlund details EA's innovation labs Exclusive
 

June 18, 2012   |   By Staff

Comments 1 comments

More: Console/PC, Production, Exclusive





In a new Gamaustra feature interview, the boss of EA's Core Games label shares how it manages staff churn and promotes new ways of thinking by using staff on small projects.

"I think it actually started at DICE with Battlefield 1943, and if you remember that it was a small XBLA game," says Patrick Soderlund. He took over the reins of EA's Games label -- which covers core PC and and console product -- from Frank Gibeau.

A team at DICE was allowed to experiment with a smaller title between projects, and since then, the company at large has adopted a policy of putting developers onto smaller, more experimental projects.

"The idea of it is test things, and either continue or kill them early. Most of the ideas will be probably not the right ones. But then one out of 10 or 15 ideas will be the right one -- that's something that we're going to say, 'We like that. Continue, and now we're going to start funding it,'" says Soderlund.

"We've been doing it now in a kind of controlled form for a little over a year, in our label. And we started small in one team, and then we tested it and we saw some good results.

"A lot of the things that you see today in our products come from these ideas, and it doesn't necessarily need to be a new product. It can be, 'Okay, here's a better way of making animations', or, 'Here's a way of making cooler destruction in something.'"

It came to life as "a way for us to control ups and downs in our production cycles," says Soderlund. Staff would "basically get transferred onto another game team and not be effective," he says, but at some point, management decided to tell some DICE developers "Okay, do whatever you want. We'll put you in this pot, do whatever you want."

"I think it's important that we enable our people to innovate and to be able to come up with new, cool ideas, because frankly, that's what our audience wants," says Soderlund.

The full feature, which further details how Soderlund hopes to solve the challenges the mega-publisher faces in its core games business as the market shifts, is live now on Gamasutra.

 
 
Top Stories

image
The laws behind Nintendo's Let's Play crackdown
image
New layoffs reach Trion
image
How developers mess up immersion (you might be doing it wrong)
image
Steam Trading Cards: The next-gen of achievements?


   
 
Comments

Joe McGinn
profile image
I've seen this in action and in generates small pockets of creativity, but it strikes me as the wrong approach. It seems like a bandaid approach: "How we do take a small percentage of people out of these massive non-creative environments we've made, so that at least some of them can be creative some of the time?"

Seems like what they really need to solve is why these large teams making games are unable to be creative.


none
 
Comment:
 




 
UBM Tech