Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
October 23, 2014
arrowPress Releases
October 23, 2014
PR Newswire
View All

If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:

Warren Spector's lessons learned from  Epic Mickey
Warren Spector's lessons learned from Epic Mickey Exclusive
July 11, 2012 | By Chris Morris

July 11, 2012 | By Chris Morris
More: Console/PC, Design, Business/Marketing, Exclusive

Warren Spector has never been afraid to polarize gamers. He is, in many ways, the epitome of the "go big or go home" style of game making and he'll be the first to tell you that he'd rather fail in spectacular fashion than do something that bores him.

But there has never been a split like Epic Mickey. It was a game that was beloved by some and ripped to shreds by others. It was the best selling single-platform game in Disney's history -- but critics thumped Disney for leaving money on the table, citing the game's decision to release exclusively on the Nintendo Wii and its post-Thanksgiving release date.

Now Spector and his team at Disney-owned Junction point are hoping to silence those critics with Epic Mickey 2: The Power of Two.

The new features, by now, are fairly well known: Co-op play with Oswald the Lucky Rabbit and Mickey; the decision to go multiplatform; a pre-Black Friday release date. (And, while it hasn't been announced, Disney sources hint a Wii U version of the game is likely.)

The in-game camera, which was the biggest source of criticism, is being fixed, says Spector. And, rather than all characters being mute, Disney has enlisted all of its character voice actors to participate in this project, and hired renowned voice actor Frank Welker to give Oswald a voice for the first time.

Perhaps most critically, some of Spector's signature design styles, which made him one of the game industry's most respected developers, are finally finding their way into the game.

Key among those is the ability to solve puzzles in more than one way. Spector is a champion of letting the player decide how to progress through the game. Games like Deus Ex and System Shock gave players the opportunity to be a gun-blazing action star or a more stealthy protagonist. The original Epic Mickey really didn't offer that.

"Once you're through with the intro level, you can get through the entire game without using paint or thinner," says Spector of the game's central game mechanic, which has players painting to create, or using paint thinner to destroy.

Spector acknowledges the original game wasn't perfect, but says he's actually quite proud of the final product, which incorporated long-forgotten Disney characters and sketches. And while core gamers might prefer his work on edgier fare, he says the response to the first title far surpassed anything he has previously done.

"I got more emails saying 'your game changed my life' than anything I've ever worked on," he says. "The emotional level was so much greater than Deus Ex or System Shock. I'm so proud that we touched people the way Disney touched me years ago. I know that 30 years from now, people will look back and say 'That's what inspired me' or 'That's when I became a Disney fan.'"

The original Epic Mickey split critics, with some lauding praise on it, while others panned it harshly. Those diametrically-opposed views gave the game a fairly low Metacritic score of 73 -- the lowest Spector has ever received.

"The reality is I've made a lot of games," he says. "And if you pay attention to Metacritic, the 'worst' game I ever worked on was 82 -- and that, I thought, was low. [Epic Mickey] was in the 70s and that got to me. ... I learned to take reviews and ratings with a little more of a grain of salt," he says. "I'm a little proud of making a game that polarized people."

While he's not making any apologies for the original game, Spector does acknowledge things could have been done better. He attributes that to the learning curve that comes with starting a new franchise -- and says those hurdles are behind him and the teams working on the game.

"With the first game, we built a team, a studio, a world, a code base, created characters and figured out how to work with Disney," he says. "If we can do it wrong, we did that.
The fact that we made a game that touched people that way, with all of those obstacles is amazing to me. ... Now, we know who Mickey is. We know who Oswald is. We knew we wanted to do co-op multiplayer. And I know what the next [game] is -- if we get to do it."

Related Jobs

Nexon America, Inc.
Nexon America, Inc. — El Segundo, California, United States

Localization Coordinator
Petroglyph Games
Petroglyph Games — Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

DeNA Studios Canada
DeNA Studios Canada — Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Analytical Game Designer
Xsolla — Sherman Oaks, California, United States

Senior Business Development Manager


TC Weidner
profile image
I love games that ooze artistic style and design.

Eric Geer
profile image
Anthony--how bad was it? I have been eyeing it. Is it worth playing or just wait till the next round?

Eric Geer
profile image

Vin St John
profile image
I found that this game was fun, but very similar to a lot of 3D mascot platformers that have gone a bit out of style recently. So, it ended up feeling a bit dated, and the element of choice was too light to change that.

The camera didn't bother me at all, but again - this may be because I've always enjoyed these 3D platformer games, and many of them have the same problems.

The use of the Disney IP was sort of uneven. On one hand, you had some awesome and original meta-stuff like MickeyJunk Mountain, a dump of oversized forgotten Mickey memorabilia, which felt really dark and creepy juxtaposed against the Disney backdrop. And then you had many levels that felt like the Kingdom Hearts B-sides - some characters were from classic black&white Disney cartoons, but a handful of more well-known franchises like Peter Pan and Tron are referenced, and it set the false expectation that the game was going to turn into a tour of Disney franchises a la Kingdom Hearts. I think that fans who really looked forward to either of these themes - either the dark, zombie-pocalypse version of Disneyland hinted at in the early-release concept art; or the Disney mash-up adventure - got a little bit of what they were looking for, but ended up disappointed.

Hopefully the next game is only an improvement!

Ian Uniacke
profile image
I thought Epic Mickey was heaps fun. It was really fun to paint something then destroy it and repaint it. Also the combat was interesting and it was cool converting bad guys to your team and then watch them beat up the other bad guys.

Chris Melby
profile image
I was excited about this game big time. I bought it day one, brought it home, put it on my shelf. TOOOOOO many games. :)

I finally got around to it and played for about an hour or two a while back, but was in the middle of another game I had been playing, so I still haven't finished it.

I'm OK with the camera controls, they didn't bother me, but maybe because they felt like a throwback to older games. I've dealt with far worse, but on the same platform as Mario Galaxy, how could they have not compared the two?

On the flip side, my friend played, finished, and loved this game. I'm sure that once I put the time into it, I'll also be in the same boat; being a fan of Disney like so many.

And that comment about System Shock and the "gun-blazing action star" threw me for a loop, because I played the game on the hardest option(3) for combat, puzzle, mission, and cyber. Maybe because I didn't play it on easy is why I can't imagine this scenario at all. The game was so balanced, that there was very little ammo to spare... :S

Joe McGinn
profile image
Loved the original art/style and ideas, if not the execution. Question going multi-platform on the sequel, that seems like a mistake.

Raymond Grier
profile image
@ Jeferson I think De Blob 2's biggest problem was marketing. I loved the first game but didn't know they were working on a sequel until after it was released.
If your company doesn't market something don't expect it to sell.