Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
October 24, 2014
arrowPress Releases
October 24, 2014
PR Newswire
View All

If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:

How  QWOP 's creator griefs players with a unicorn
How QWOP's creator griefs players with a unicorn Exclusive
August 3, 2012 | By Mike Rose

August 3, 2012 | By Mike Rose
More: Console/PC, Indie, Design, Exclusive

It's always obvious when Bennett Foddy has released a new game. Twitter is suddenly filled with devs, gamers and journalists pasting the appropriate link, then it all goes quiet for a few minutes. Finally, messages of frustration and profanity come in thick and fast, as players feed on Foddy's purposeful trolling.

Foddy has discussed the act of griefing players as a game mechanic numerous times before, and it's an angle that appears to work rather well, as shown by the huge popularity of QWOP and GIRP.

At first, his new game CLOP appears to be more of the same, and especially in line with QWOP. Players guide a clumsy unicorn from right to left, on a quest to reach a fair maiden -- however, an utterly hopeless control scheme that involves moving each separate leg with H, J, K and L makes this far more difficult than it sounds.

Those who have played QWOP before will no doubt find the opening moments of CLOP to be rather simple in comparison. The unicorn doesn't really topple so easily, and any combination of key presses appears to do the job, forcing the mythical creature forward.

This, however, is all part of the plan, as CLOP explores yet another method of griefing its players -- through lulling them into a false sense of security.

The game may start off easy enough, but just wait until you hit the incline that follows the flat land, and the obstacles that are laid out after that. What appears to be one of Foddy's least challenging games slowly but surely shows itself to be just as evil.

"It's much easier to custom-design a difficulty ramp when the difficulty comes in the form of an actual ramp," laughs Foddy.

He continues, "I guess it doesn't make sense for a horse to fall over from standing, like QWOP does, but I also don't want to start the player on a steep hill, before they've even tried the controls. Once you get a bit better at it, you can go really fast and clear the flat section in about five seconds, so I think that saves it from being too repetitive."

As it turns out, though, CLOP isn't just proving a challenge for players. Development of the title was also rather tricky for Foddy, as he found it difficult to get the movement mechanics to work well with the concept.

"I was trying to do it the 'right way,' like robotics researchers or Pixar animators would, and it wasn't working," he notes.

"But I had a bit of a breakthrough back at GDC, when I showed it to [SpyParty developer] Chris Hecker who is like the world expert in limb-physics animation. And what he said was 'why would you want to do it the right way?'

"It was basically the opposite of his famous 'please finish your game' rant, but it was totally the right advice," adds Foddy.

Related Jobs

Bohemia Interactive Simulations
Bohemia Interactive Simulations — Prague, Czech Republic

Game Designer
Next Games
Next Games — Helsinki, Finland

Senior Level Designer
Magic Leap, Inc.
Magic Leap, Inc. — Wellington, New Zealand

Level Designer
DeNA Studios Canada
DeNA Studios Canada — Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Analytical Game Designer


Chris Hecker
profile image
If I may correct Bennett's gross misrepresentation of my--frankly--excellent advice, what he was doing with CLOP early on was the equivalent of what every newb game programmer does with their fetishism of terrain LOD systems, or trying to make sure their object system have just the exactly right amount of layering, or ratholing on rigid body dynamics (*cough* this one was my specific newb folly *cough*). In his case, not only was it a rathole and waste of time like these other examples, but it would have made the game worse along the aesthetic axis he likes to explore! Well, "worse" is a little ambiguous when it comes to Bennett's games, so let's say it would have made the game less suitable for hosting on 'Finishing your game' is not about doing things "right" for any mathematical definition of right, it's about doing things right for your specific game design. Bennett clearly finished CLOP, and it's terribly awesome, or awesomely terrible, or something. It's clearly a great Bennett Foddy game, and that's what matters.

tony oakden
profile image
OK you got my attention WTF is "ratholing on rigid body dynamics"? The only seemingly relevant definition I can find in google relates to the blending of materials: "* Rat holing - this occurs when mass flow is not occurring from the discharge area of the blender (hopper). A vertical column of material exits the area above the valve - causing the segregation of the blended powders. Powder near the vessel walls travels slower than material in the center, which can lead to de-blending of the material. "

All the other definitions I found relate to online poker, which where interesting but probably irrelevant :)

Olivier Besson
profile image
it seems that the game totally misses the huge potential of french and belgian audience because this is obviously not designed for AZERTY keyboard.

Jonathan Ghazarian
profile image
Unless he changed it since you posted, the keys should work just as well between qwerty and azerty. Now, as for dvorak users, they're completely screwed.

Pieterjan Spoelders
profile image
I got from the article that he intended to provide such a clunky control scheme to grieve players intentionally. And like Jonathan above me said, it's the same for both qwerty and azerty. :)